Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
medway_garage
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Male, 40
0 miles · London

Forum

Quote by gulsonroad30664
the payouts will contain gagging clauses to protect the real criminals.

And here comes the problem with all this, It's kind of like a 'legal no mans land',no guilt or innocence has been proven either way, no torture has been proven.........but the fact that the government has spent several £million of tax payers money speaks volumes !
Take a look at this documentary;

I agree with Dave Notts,I am very uneasy that the UK has been using torture,even If the government are laughably trying to deny It ! This would be alot more paletable If there was a courtcase,don't forget some of these people are British citizens,they are just as entitled to a fair trial as you or I,not this Kafkaesque ,If in the future we face an enemy that is also willing to break the geneva convention,do we really have the moral high ground anymore, I don't think so !
Quote by GnV
They should fund it from TB's and GB's pension.

I'm in complete agreement on that one, shame It won't happen ! Although this case is supposedly now settled, the inference is that we've tortured these detainees and this opens the door to more settlements as mentioned in the Guardian article, not good !
What do you make of this ? ;

Just a week or two back there was a press conference by the head of MI5, denying any involvement of the security services in torture allegations, so why wasn't this case allowed to go to court ? A multi million pound cave in,even the true figure is secret although it's apparently less than £30 million !!!!!!! Of TAX PAYERS MONEY WTF !!!!
Quote by essex34m

Also the TV news found information from websites and social networking sites, talking about anarchists infiltrating the protest,posted weeks beforehand,why couldn't the Police find the same information,or weren't they looking ?

If the media found this information beforehand, then surely they should have divulged this to the authorities? If the media found this afterwards, then there is a chance that the police had the same leads to go on that the media did, and I'm guessing the investigations have not been made public, so therefore is not something I can comment on with any great knowledge.
No the media looked for the information afterwards,but the Police should also have been aware of this,via the Police inteligence units who moniter extremist websites etc ?
Were the Police trying to make a political point about the cuts they face ? If this had been muslim extremists would they have let them march passed Tory H.Q unchallenged ? I doubt It !
So Facebook should now be considered an extremist website???
The Government has succeeded in planting paranoia and suspicion in your mind.
lol very good, no I was refering to the anarchist ones, but then again......!
Quote by essex34m

Also the TV news found information from websites and social networking sites, talking about anarchists infiltrating the protest,posted weeks beforehand,why couldn't the Police find the same information,or weren't they looking ?

If the media found this information beforehand, then surely they should have divulged this to the authorities? If the media found this afterwards, then there is a chance that the police had the same leads to go on that the media did, and I'm guessing the investigations have not been made public, so therefore is not something I can comment on with any great knowledge.
No the media looked for the information afterwards,but the Police should also have been aware of this,via the Police inteligence units who moniter extremist websites etc ?
Were the Police trying to make a political point about the cuts they face ? If this had been muslim extremists would they have let them march passed Tory H.Q unchallenged ? I doubt It !
Posted this on another thread but It's more relevent on this one;
Going back to the discussion on the Police force and the fire extinguisher incident at the student protest,I agree the student was a idiot for doing that,however,I do seem to recall Police officers actually causing the death of a civilian at the G20 protest in London, didn't the Police get let off ?

But of course it's not the first time a civilian has been killed by British Police,there has been many over the years,maybe the most contentious being the Stockwell shooting of Brazilian student Jean Charles de Menezes,who was shot 7 times in the head of the Police force at the time,Ian Blair, gave a VERY misleading press conference to the media,full of lies and half fact a lot of people still think the version they read in the media was the truth,there was no effort from the Police to correct any of this .

CCTV footage


I wouldn't be surprised if the reason for the low Police numbers around Millbank, was deliberate, maybe a protest of sorts over the upcoming cuts in the Police force.
Also the TV news found information from websites and social networking sites, talking about anarchists infiltrating the protest,posted weeks beforehand,why couldn't the Police find the same information,or weren't they looking ?
Quote by Geordiecpl2001
To jump back to topic, I saw the program and my thoughts are;
If Richard Branson was doing a program about our dept and how we got into it and how to get out of it, I'd take lots of notice as he is a successful businessman. But for a film-maker / economist to spout off.................I'll have an extra-large potion of salt with that please !!
John

Here's an alternate view you might share John, some good points in there,the film maker does seem to have a bit of a history of distortion;

Going back to the discussion on the Police force and the fire extinguisher incident at the student protest,I agree the student was a idiot for doing that,however,I do seem to recall Police officers actually causing the death of a civillian at the G20 protest in London, didn't the Police get let off ?

But of course it's not the first time a civilian has been killed by British Police,there has been many over the years,maybe the most contentious being the Stockwell shooting of Brazilian student Jean Charles de Menezes,who was shot 7 times in the head of the Police force at the time,Ian Blair, gave a VERY misleading press conference to the media,full of lies and half fact a lot of people still think the version they read in the media was the truth,there was no effort from the Police to correct any of this .

CCTV footage

I wouldn't be surprised if the reason for the low Police numbers around Millbank, was deliberate, maybe a protest of sorts over the upcoming cuts in the Police force.
Also the TV news found information from websites and social networking sites, talking about anarchists infiltrating the protest,posted weeks beforehand,why couldn't the Police find the same information,or weren't they looking ?
Quote by GnV
I'm a bit disadvantaged on commenting but I can only think that the reference to cutting taxes refers to direct tax. Indirect tax such as VAT is more acceptable if there is such a thing because it directly relates to choice perhaps?

It was direct tax,Hong Kong does not have VAT as far as I know,I've got a friend who lives there so I could Kong being the model example used in the program.
Quote by swcpl2005
The £50 note throwing away every second was an interesting analogy to try and put an understandable dimension on the size of the debt Brown has saddled the UK with.

I got the distinct impression It wasn't only Brown's fault,the private sector cuts and desimation of British industry for example, very much fell under Thatcher's time in office,importing items on the cheap such as coal and machine parts instead of making them Labour do have a lot of blame for pointless bureaucracy,quango's and waste,I'm certainly not arguing with that the ConDEM want to make cuts they should start with the pen pushers in the public sector and leave front line services alone,but I have a feeling they won't.
Yes the piles of £50 notes was pretty shocking,no cuts the conDEM's make will solve this,anyone care to comment on the solution outlined in the program,seems odd that cutting taxes would help,but then I'm not an economist I have no idea !
Quote by GnV
Sadly medway, I can't view it as my IP address is outside the UK but whether left or right, I totally agree that there is one almighty debt crisis to address which can only begin to be handled once the deficit has been dealt with. This seems to be the point that most people just can't get their heads round.
I believe the ConDem Alliance have taken the right initial steps to protect and even reduce the rates at which interest is currently being paid. Whether it works in the long term is yet to be proven but I certainly hope that it will. Although Eire is currently saying they don't need foreign assistance in handling their financial crisis, it was interesting to note this week that their star rating has been downgraded and like Greece and Portugal, are going to find life increasingly more difficult should they need to turn to the financial markets for help.
As for Kaz's stance on Friedman not holding water, I can only assume she also subscribes to the theory that "property is theft" as much as she does that students have the right to terrorise innocent people going about their everyday working lives to which she alluded in the Student Protest thread. Milton Friedman has consistently shown himself to be an acknowledged authority on these matters and he should not be discounted so easily by those with scant experience in international monetary affairs.

It will be interesting to hear differing opinions of this documentary,yes It was polemic for sure, but there's things within it to give people of all political pursuations pause for thought.
On one hand Labour was blamed for It's spending,pointless bloated jobs in the public sector,quango's on the other hand It was mentioned we don't have enough jobs in the private sector,
I'm afraid if this documentary is to be believed,the government cuts will make NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL ! The analogy used was if you imagine a bath three quaters full,with the tap running as Britain's debt,the govenment cuts would represent an egg cup bailing out the water !
At the end of the documentary,Hong Kong was used as a model,notably what was implimented by Adam Smith, No Tax for poorer people 20% for the rich.
Interesting documentary for sure,shame you can't view it GnV,a tad worrying that none of the politicians asked , knew the figure of how much the UK was in debt !
I urge those of you interested in this topic to watch this documentary before commenting,not easy viewing for those on the left or the right......but with an interesting solution to Britain's debt towards the end of the documentary;
QUOTE;Film maker Martin Durkin explains the full extent of the financial mess we are in: an estimated £4.8 of national debt and counting. It's so big that even if every home in the UK was sold it wouldn't raise enough cash to pay it off.
Durkin argues that to put Britain back on track we need to radically rethink the role of the state, stop politicians spending money in our name and introduce, among other measures, flat taxes to make Britain's economy boom again.
This polemical film presented by Martin Durkin, brings economic theory to life and makes it hit home. It includes interviews with academics, economic experts, entrepreneurs, no less than four ex-Chancellors of the Exchequer and the biggest stack of £50 notes you'll never OF QUOTE
Quote by Bluefish2009
It is what some may call a conspiracy theory, However I feel its good to have an open mind on such things. I try not to dismiss any one thoughts, however extreme they may first seam. We do know as fact that people are more than capable of planning the most terrible of things given the chance.
If the right people had been in the right place, or should I say the wrong people, the below could well have happened!


I can think of one such plan that did happen within Europe no less ! Operation Gladio

Here's links to the BBC's Three part Timewatch documentary on the subject,description by the original YouTube uploader;
Gladio by Allan Francovich
BBC Timewatch (1992)
Episode 1 - The Ring Masters
Episode 2 - The Puppeteers
Episode 3 - The Foot Soldiers
BBC series about a far-right secret army, operated by the CIA and MI6 through NATO, which killed hundreds of innocent Europeans and attempted to blame the deaths on Baader Meinhof, Red Brigades and other left wing groups. Known as 'stay-behinds' these armies were given access to military equipment which was supposed to be used for sabotage after a Soviet invasion. Instead it was used to in massacres across mainland Europe as part of a CIA Strategy of Tension. Gladio killing sprees in Belgium and Italy were carried out for the purpose of frightening the national political classes into adopting U.S. policies. Director Allan Frankovich
Episode 1 - The Ring Masters





Episode 2 - The Puppeteers





Episode 3 - The Foot Soldiers




Quote by flower411
When the bin men stop collecting and the baker stops baking we would know about it within days ..... when the architect stops or the solicitor gives up it might take years before society actually noticed !!
Let`s pay for important stuff ! :thumbup:

Well,you may well get your wish soon when the cuts are made, certainly with the binmen will be interesting to see what happens on future protests over cuts, remember the Poll Tax riot, I can see the same level of anger out there at the moment!
I am however amazed that the students are so shocked, LibDem politicians caught lying jeez,what a surprise ! Although the NUS are promising some interesting direct action on that 's in seats won through student votes should be very wary !
Quote by Bluefish2009
I think he is saying that is possibly the motivation for why we intervened

Bang on the money
Sorry Dave, it would be pointless for me to enter into imaginary 'country A or B' senarios, it makes no sense, as we know from reality there are many other factors to take into account, I won't give you another history lesson there's plenty of links for you to look at if you should so choose.
So getting back to Iraq Iraq was actually invaded because of WMD's,,there was no pursuit of a second resolution at the U.N, there was an obvious rush to engage in the war, so make of that what you will !
My personal view is that there were several reasons for the invasion, unfinished business from Bush ,arms contracts, the oil supply in the region and of course implimenting a different puppet dictator, one that will do Washington's bidding without question !
Dave I'll be happy to debate with you more if you like, but I'm off to London, staying at a friends house, so I'm not snubbing you, I'll be back next a good weekend all !
Quote by Bluefish2009
My only thought here is that the blame for those deaths were laid firmly at the feet of a dictator, now they are placed firmly at our/alies feet.
I really dislike, well I am unsure about the idea of intervention, who is the big judge to say we are better? Do we have a world law?
Add to that several generations growing up being taught to hate the west, all we are do is storing up trouble for the future

I agree with you 100% ,some very good points ! Intervention should always be the last option on the table, better to use sanctions and political fact that the US and UK didn't even wait for the second U.N resolution is Saddam was using chemical weapons , the US were also happy to sell him weapons as long as he used them against Iran,Saddam was also torturing his own people during this period , yet 'The West' choose to ignore It,so what gives us the right to take the moral ground all of a sudden.
If we can pick and choose in which countries to intervene, does that also give us the right to choose which countries have nuclear weapons ?
"Don't reply to medway_garage posts in a manner other than supporting his views least you be branded a troll"
You really are funny, amazing how you keep turning that one around, I have no problem with people disagreeing with me, but when certain individuals engage in troll like behavour, i.e GnV and Max777 because I don't agree with their right wing agenda, well I'll leave it at that, go back over the threads and make up your own mind !
What is Al-Qaida?
Is it a worldwide group of international terrorists like we are let to believe, or
as the late Robin Cook wrote, a 'computer file' of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA.
Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden's organisation would turn its attention to the west.

Do Al-Qaida as an organised worldwide terrorist group even exist ? Or are there 'many' separate groups with a similar Bin-Laden orchestrate Sept 11th or not, let's have a look at the FBI's webpage;

QUOTE;Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the OF QUOTE
Who can spot the missing event ? So is there any proof of Bin-Laden's involvment or have they not updated their webpage since 2001 ? Seeing as this has now been ingrained into popular culture I would like to see some evidence of his involvement.I do agree that Bin-Laden is a terrorist, that's not in doubt, just the proof of his involvement in 9/11. It would appear that the FBI do not consider the 'fat' Bin-Laden tape, to be proof, as 9/11 is still not listed.
Now let's look at MI6's involvement in the plot to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi, a plot that involved the funding of 'an islamic group' by MI6, a story that got David Shayler arrested for breaking the official secrets act !
"We need a statement from the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary clarifying the facts of this matter. In particular, we need to know how around £100,000 of taxpayers' money was used to fund the sort of Islamic Extremists who have connections to Osama Bin Laden's Al Qaeda network. Did ministers give MI6 permission for this? By the time MI6 paid the group in late 1995 or early 1996, US investigators had already established that Bin Laden was implicated in the 1993 attack on the World Trade Centre. Given the timing and the close connections between Libyan and Egyptian Islamic Extremists, it may even have been used to fund the murder of British citizens in Luxor, Egypt in 1996.
Including some very interesting documents.

Panorama


Now let's look at the history of this mystery group Al-Qaida;
Adam Curtis-The Power Of Nightmares

The most telling and up to date, being the third part, where the issue of Al-Qaida as an 'organised worldwide terrorist group' is questioned !
Quote by Dave__Notts
Whatever the figure, it is still horrendous. Yet, there was death in that country numbering thousands each year when it was _Notts

When it was stable ? Firstly,I would like to know when you thought the country was stable,under Saddam I presume ? Presumably this would be when they were kiling thousands each year ? So why the need for US and UK intervention if it was 'stable',I'm a little confused by your statement given the question you asked me earler.
During the Reagan years the US covertly supplied Iraq with weapons to fight against Iran, the US were also aware of the use of chemical weapons against Iran, have a look at the following link and the declassified documents;

Going back to the current conflict, here's some very interesting reading, again with plenty of declassified documents;
THE IRAQ WAR -- PART I: The U.S. Prepares for Conflict, 2001
U.S. Sets "Decapitation of Government" As Early Goal of Combat
Talking Points for Rumsfeld-Franks Meeting in November 2001 Outline Policy Makers’ Aims for the Conflict and Postwar Rule of Iraq

THE IRAQ WAR -- PART II: Was There Even a Decision?
U.S. and British Documents Give No Indication Alternatives Were Seriously Considered

THE IRAQ WAR -- PART III: Shaping the Debate
U.S. and British Documents Show Transatlantic Propaganda Cooperation
Joint Drafting & Editing of White Papers “Fixed the Facts”
Quote by Dave__Notts
So you are saying that Country B should not intervene if it has already intervened in other countries. Looking at the example I was giving. You would now prefer the death of an extra 750,000 people. Is that correct? How do you justify the action of appeasement?
Dave_Notts

Well i was being a little arch,but we know America's record on this one, one rule for them, but an entirely different rule for say.......Venezula .
The UK were quite happy to appease Indonesia,they had no intention of getting involved in the genocide that was being carried out against East Timor,which may of course be something to do the arms they were selling to the dictaror Surhato.
Let's have a look at some examples from history and the present,China,Nanking Massacre invasion by the Japanese, did the UK or the US come to their aid when they were invaded,no ! the invasion of China happened even before WW2 began,so why no intervention ? Now let's look at China today

Possibly the worst human rights record in the world,so I ask you,why haven't we intervened in China, or North Korea for that matter ? Weak countries we can easily destroy with 'Shock and Awe' and large troop and North Korea however would probably desimate the US forces,a more equal fight.........no wonder the US doesn't want to take them on.
Quote by GnV
:laughabove:
You make wild unsubstantiated statements, are asked to explain what you mean by them, you duck the issue and then when challenged accuse the responder of being a troll!
Please don't flatter yourself. I'm sure you'll get the hang of this place sooner or later. wink

Oh dear the cracks are beginning to show in the LibDem's, keep it up !

I see so your not a troll, well If anyone has the time, feel free to go back over the threads and you will see a pattern develop lol bye troll !
Right back to the tax avoidance/evasion issue if you don't mind, a very interesting podcast interview with John Christensen from the tax justice network ,who previously worked within the banking system and also as economic advisor to the government of Jersey.

Fourth show - 2nd February 2009 (Part 1) - Interview with John Christensen
Quote by GnV
So then, no change there from the Brown years at Number 10? Is that what you are saying?
In this case, there was an election; an alliance of properly elected MP's was formed. The last Government resigned (eventually) and Her Majesty acted on the advice of the outgoing PM to invite DC to form a Government.
Where is the fault in that? Is it unconstitutional and is DC a squatter in Downing Street?
Please explain your viewpoint because I'm struggling to understand what you are implying.

Yeah 'squatter in Downing Street' sounds about right, thanks for that one good quote !
I'm not sure I want to play your game any more.
Max has it right...

Well takes one to know one, that's for sure. why can't you just agree to disagree ? Instead you throw your toys out of your pram, never mind wink
Quote by GnV
at the risk of repeating myself...

Mmmmmm shall I hold the mirror up now ! Who keeps following and posting on my threads and the definition of a troll is...........wait for it.........
QUOTE:In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional OF QUOTE
Now go back and look at your posts on my threads wink
Quote by GnV
So then, no change there from the Brown years at Number 10? Is that what you are saying?
In this case, there was an election; an alliance of properly elected MP's was formed. The last Government resigned (eventually) and Her Majesty acted on the advice of the outgoing PM to invite DC to form a Government.
Where is the fault in that? Is it unconstitutional and is DC a squatter in Downing Street?
Please explain your viewpoint because I'm struggling to understand what you are implying.

Yeah 'squatter in Downing Street' sounds about right, thanks for that one good quote !
I think left leaning Liberal Democrat voters might take issue with your comment,LibDem's should enjoy their 15 mins of fame, don't think their voters are too impressed,certainly down this neck of the woods anyway wink
You keep referring to the "Tories" but the Government of Britain, if you hadn't noticed, is an alliance.
Yes, you're right the Tories didn't win did they ! So illegitimate government is perhaps a better term !
Quote by GnV
How can anyone take this joke of an Opposition seriously?

And who can take the CONdem government seriously, neither of them was even elected properly lol
Quote by GnV
How far are you prepared to go to suggest the length of Dr Cable's tongue?

Now that is funny lol
Quote by Bluefish2009
There is, as far as I am aware, no law against Tax avoidance. The listed company's are large company's employing thousands and contributing a massive amount to the economy.
I don't believe this government any different to any previous government on this score dunno

I think you are right about the last bit, damn sure there are quite a few Labour tax avoiders as well. I say close these loopholes FOR ALL, If the poor have to pay dearly with welfare cuts,housing,jobs etc, why shouldn't the rich pay their fair share as well !