Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Hands Off Our Land

last reply
41 replies
2.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Hands Off Our Land: 45 Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs tell David Cameron to rethink planning reforms
David Cameron has been told by his own MPs to put the countryside ahead of the need to stimulate the economy, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.


Let us hope he listens
i agree totally. we need the countryside but too many people trying to buy it for the wrong reasons. ok, foxes and all!
Hands Off Our Land: Frustrated Osborne vows to make building on countryside easier as cracks show in Government
George Osborne yesterday pledged to push through planning rules that will make it easier to build in the countryside, despite reassurances by ministerial colleagues that the reforms will not be a "developer's charter".

Unless of course you happen own a large estate in Dorset .... then of course you can build a large mock tudor monstrosity with impunity
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Unless of course you happen own a large estate in Dorset .... then of course you can build a large mock tudor monstrosity with impunity

Do you have a link to prove this claim? lol
i love my bit of the countryside, but why don't other people respect it. sick of people just thinking they can do what they want and we have to clean up after them. a little thought should be used, then i wouldn't mind anyone roaming around.

School playing fields will be given special protection against being sold off for housing developments, after ministers agreed to water down their controversial planning reforms.

A new city could be built in the Midlands alongside the controversial High Speed 2 rail line as part of a drive to tackle the country’s housing shortage.
The transport project’s chief engineer said up to 100,000 homes could be built on green belt land.
Quote by Bluefish2009
Unless of course you happen own a large estate in Dorset .... then of course you can build a large mock tudor monstrosity with impunity

Do you have a link to prove this claim? lol
Now you know I never provide links Blue
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Unless of course you happen own a large estate in Dorset .... then of course you can build a large mock tudor monstrosity with impunity

Do you have a link to prove this claim? lol
Now you know I never provide links Blue

let me guess before i even see the link.
yep just as i thought. very predictable. :sleeping:
as an after thought i see that mr scargill is being evicted from his 1.5 million pound flat that is courtesy of the now defunked NUM. just another look at these things. :bounce:
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Unless of course you happen own a large estate in Dorset .... then of course you can build a large mock tudor monstrosity with impunity

Do you have a link to prove this claim? lol
Now you know I never provide links Blue

Oh I see, a dig in the ribs for the Royals wink
Quote by Bluefish2009
Oh I see, a dig in the ribs for the Royals wink

i much prefer this house myself bluefish.

still there will always be some peeple who get a bit green around the gills when they see things like this. :doh:rotflmao
Quote by starlightcouple
Unless of course you happen own a large estate in Dorset .... then of course you can build a large mock tudor monstrosity with impunity

Do you have a link to prove this claim? lol
Now you know I never provide links Blue

let me guess before i even see the link.
yep just as i thought. very predictable. :sleeping:
Oh I very much doubt it
as an after thought i see that mr scargill is being evicted from his 1.5 million pound flat that is courtesy of the now defunked NUM. just another look at these things. :bounce:
A look at what things ?? nothing of any real relevance to this thread ...so just another pointless dig at king Arthur then ... well that's not in the least bit predictable is it
This land is your land................
Quote by Ben_Minx
This land is your land................

I believe that machine kills fascists
Quote by Ben_Minx
This land is your land................

Yes in deed, but will we not reach critical mass at some point, we can not keep building and destroying the future generations chances of seeing countryside... Can we?
Depends what "countryside" means.
Farms, factories, all the same to me tbh.
Quote by Ben_Minx
Depends what "countryside" means.
Farms, factories, all the same to me tbh.

I am stunned by this statement
So that is where we differ on a massive scale then, and helps explain many of your, to me seemingly, strange statements.
For me factory's, Farm land, and countryside differ massively. My hope would be for many generations to come to be able to enjoy time in the countryside. I would hate for them to have to plan a picnic in a farmyard or a factory :sad:
Hands Off Our Land: campaigners hail a 'good day for anyone who cares about the countryside'
Campaigners have welcomed the Government’s decision to water down planning reforms that threatened unrestrained building across swathes of the English countryside.
Groups including the National Trust and the Campaign to Protect Rural England expressed relief that ministers had listened to their concerns after months of argument.
like you blue iv`e walked many miles of farmland and countryside nothing more stunning than when its covered with snow
many brooks and streams that make nice little places for a secluded picnic on a summers day :rascal:
things like watching grayling and chub gracing the waters
i agree blue hand off our countryside and leave the high rise blocks for the ignorant that doesn't appreciate it and don't know how to use it wink
Quote by Lizaleanrob
like you blue iv`e walked many miles of farmland and countryside nothing more stunning than when its covered with snow
many brooks and streams that make nice little places for a secluded picnic on a summers day :rascal:
things like watching grayling and chub gracing the waters
i agree blue hand off our countryside and leave the high rise blocks for the ignorant that doesn't appreciate it and don't know how to use it wink

:thumbup:
I could not agree more Rob, The campian is after all, as it says, to save "our" country side... I looked at the word, "our" and presumed it meant everyone, after all it is ours, yours mine, and even Bens
I love the countryside with a passion and will support any campaign that helps protect it.
My point, and I apologise as I have made the point before, is that you dont define what you mean by countryside.
Quote by Ben_Minx
My point, and I apologise as I have made the point before, is that you dont define what you mean by countryside.

You will find plenty of information in the links as to what the campaign stands for.
Thankfully they have made some great steps forward
Much info can be found here
Quite. The definition of countryside is as woolly as ever. Nimbys masquerading as environmentalists I reckon.
Hands off whose land ? are the government planning to input compulsory purchase orders to build whatever it is they plan to build ? they do this a lot in the towns and cities so I just wondered if this is what this thread is about, or are they just planning to relax planning laws and utilise the land owned by ALL the taxpayers of the UK to make more room for our expanding population.
Has anyone living in the Countryside ever objected to the masses of building, compulsory purchase orders, land fill or anything else that happens in our urban areas, why if we need the land for other purposes should we not be allowed to use it, is there a law that says it is only for those in that area to dictate what is done with it, don't get me wrong I love the countryside and would love to keep it as it is, but needs as must and I am a realist, if we need it then we need it just as things are used in urban areas. Lately there are a few threads about those living in sparcely populated areas, well those living in urban areas have problems too, take fuel, it may cost more in rural areas but when it's in the tank you get to use it moving around not use it like urbanites do stuck in traffic jams for hours on end, slow crawling to and from work everyday, changing gear and stopping n starting every few minutes making consumption higher for like for like distance journeys. We have health hazards in pollution and germ transference abounding.
People in the countryside have the option to move to the urban areas, people in urban areas do not have the option to move to the countryside unless there are new planning laws as are being implemented now. Food for thought perhaps
Quote by MidsCouple24
Hands off whose land ? are the government planning to input compulsory purchase orders to build whatever it is they plan to build ? they do this a lot in the towns and cities so I just wondered if this is what this thread is about, or are they just planning to relax planning laws and utilise the land owned by ALL the taxpayers of the UK to make more room for our expanding population.
Has anyone living in the Countryside ever objected to the masses of building, compulsory purchase orders, land fill or anything else that happens in our urban areas, why if we need the land for other purposes should we not be allowed to use it, is there a law that says it is only for those in that area to dictate what is done with it, don't get me wrong I love the countryside and would love to keep it as it is, but needs as must and I am a realist, if we need it then we need it just as things are used in urban areas. Lately there are a few threads about those living in sparcely populated areas, well those living in urban areas have problems too, take fuel, it may cost more in rural areas but when it's in the tank you get to use it moving around not use it like urbanites do stuck in traffic jams for hours on end, slow crawling to and from work everyday, changing gear and stopping n starting every few minutes making consumption higher for like for like distance journeys. We have health hazards in pollution and germ transference abounding.
People in the countryside have the option to move to the urban areas, people in urban areas do not have the option to move to the countryside unless there are new planning laws as are being implemented now. Food for thought perhaps

Build away then until your heart is content, short sighted in my view though.
The population can not continue to expand for ever. I was born in the countryside but sadly unable to afford to live there now, had to move to a more urban area, but I would still not support short sighted planning laws just to get a house in the countryside
Quote by Ben_Minx
Quite. The definition of countryside is as woolly as ever. Nimbys masquerading as environmentalists I reckon.

Of coarse that is your view, however, I think you are incorrect. I think it sensible to try to protect the countryside, or green belt land, if that helps you Ben. That is my view, clearly the opposite to yours.
Yeah like I said NIMBYs.
Quote by Ben_Minx
Yeah like I said NIMBYs.

Like I said, I feel you are wrong, For instance, it is not my back yard is it, I already live in a town dunno
Quote by Bluefish2009
Yeah like I said NIMBYs.

Like I said, I feel you are wrong, For instance, it is not my back yard is it, I already live in a town dunno
once a townie always a townie blue aye wink
rotflmao:rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao:
Quote by Bluefish2009
Yeah like I said NIMBYs.

Like I said, I feel you are wrong, For instance, it is not my back yard is it, I already live in a town dunno
I thought green belts usually surrounded towns.