Superinjunctions & the 'internet'

Quote by foxylady2209
Sadly, a lot of newspapers think that 'in the public interest' is the same as 'the public are interested in it'.

Quote by Too Hot
I reckon we should be supporting the right to take out injunctions - super - or regular. This is just about peoples right to privacy.
A large number of people on this site would be hugely embarrassed if they were outed as Swingers and those in "sensitive" professions like teaching could lose their jobs and face local humiliation.
We all have a right to privacy and one persons acceptable behaviour can just as easily be viewed as outrageously anti social by mainstream society and so very news worthy.
Be careful what we wish for. Ryan Giggs has done nothing more than many men (and women) have done outside a marriage and everyone who has done it knew that being outed would cause embarrassment and humiliation. All of us have a right to privacy, privacy is not the right of just the working class and if we demand to know who is shagging who in the celebrity world then the next person in the local newspaper might just be you because you have a hobby outside the mainstream. How would you feel when local chavs start spraying "pervert" on your house door because they are stupid and ignorant and get wound up by what local rags say about your "perverted hobby."

Quote by annejohn
I reckon we should be supporting the right to take out injunctions - super - or regular. This is just about peoples right to privacy.
A large number of people on this site would be hugely embarrassed if they were outed as Swingers and those in "sensitive" professions like teaching could lose their jobs and face local humiliation.
We all have a right to privacy and one persons acceptable behaviour can just as easily be viewed as outrageously anti social by mainstream society and so very news worthy.
Be careful what we wish for. Ryan Giggs has done nothing more than many men (and women) have done outside a marriage and everyone who has done it knew that being outed would cause embarrassment and humiliation. All of us have a right to privacy, privacy is not the right of just the working class and if we demand to know who is shagging who in the celebrity world then the next person in the local newspaper might just be you because you have a hobby outside the mainstream. How would you feel when local chavs start spraying "pervert" on your house door because they are stupid and ignorant and get wound up by what local rags say about your "perverted hobby."

Quote by Too Hot
I reckon we should be supporting the right to take out injunctions - super - or regular. This is just about peoples right to privacy.
A large number of people on this site would be hugely embarrassed if they were outed as Swingers and those in "sensitive" professions like teaching could lose their jobs and face local humiliation.
We all have a right to privacy and one persons acceptable behaviour can just as easily be viewed as outrageously anti social by mainstream society and so very news worthy.
Be careful what we wish for. Ryan Giggs has done nothing more than many men (and women) have done outside a marriage and everyone who has done it knew that being outed would cause embarrassment and humiliation. All of us have a right to privacy, privacy is not the right of just the working class and if we demand to know who is shagging who in the celebrity world then the next person in the local newspaper might just be you because you have a hobby outside the mainstream. How would you feel when local chavs start spraying "pervert" on your house door because they are stupid and ignorant and get wound up by what local rags say about your "perverted hobby."