Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

are promiscious people attractive?

last reply
98 replies
4.6k views
0 watchers
0 likes
No.
People who give the impression that they are selective make you feel much more special if they 'select' you. Who wants to be just another anyone?
Rethinking that, I should have said that it depends more on their attitude. Being promiscuous isn't in itself offputting, its the idea that someone will shag anyone and you'll do too.
Quote by Kaznkev
not the moment to mention my nickname then :giggle:
<<<<<<<<<<<<goes to find a thread looking for people who just like fucking,
ohh Lost ,how you doing ? :twisted:

<<<<<< is intrigued about Kaz's nickname!!
I like fucking ..... lots and lots of fucking!! :twisted:
I like fucking with lots of different people so I guess I am promiscuous. But, I wont just shag anyone.
A couple of the guys at the dogging venue we got to told us one night that we had a reputation for being too fussy. I think we over-worked their 2 brain cells when we thanked them for the compliment.
It's not so much the numbers of partners that turns us off someone, more the ones who will fuck anyone and everyone.
Quote by brucie
its just if im in a club and a girl is getting fucked by what i call the bottom dwellers then she may look like j-lo but im still not attracted.

What qualifies you to give someone the tag of 'bottom dweller'? Do you judge them on looks or their attitude?
J-Lo, who is fucking the bottom dweller may know him and think he is a great guy. Peoples taste vary, that doesn't make her a slapper!
Quote by Funlovers2009
its just if im in a club and a girl is getting fucked by what i call the bottom dwellers then she may look like j-lo but im still not attracted.[/quote
What qualifies you to give someone the tag of 'bottom dweller'? Do you judge them on looks or their attitude?
J-Lo, who is fucking the bottom dweller may know him and think he is a great guy. Peoples taste vary, that doesn't make her a slapper!

Oh, political correctness at SH? or was the thread meaning people who have a fettish for bottoms wink
Plim
Quote by Jewlnmart
It's not so much the numbers of partners that turns us off someone, more the ones who will fuck anyone and everyone.

Yes I agree. I have a friend who is really quite attractive but he as a reputation that he would shag a raggy salmon tin. Now no doubt he is good at his art but its nice to feel that the person I might fuck is at least attracted to me and is not just after somewhere to warm his cock for a while.
And the 'form a queue' image Brucie mentions is definitely not appealing either.
I tended to find that the truly promiscuous are sometimes missing something up top. the expression 'screwy' has a double meaning and very suited to the predicament.
I only have sex with my partner, we might have queues to watch but thats as far as it goes for us.
Some men like a "dirty woman" for want of a better phrase
Far more attractive than those who seem to think that their own choices are the only valid ones and that it is perfectly acceptable to judge and publicly condemn those who make different choices.
Im certainly not judging or condeming anyone elses choices. I dont have a problem with anyone elses promiscuity. Far from it. All Im trying to say is that for me personally i dont want to be 'any hole's a goal' for someone. I like to think that that someone actually wants to play with me.
Quote by Ben_welshminx
Far more attractive than those who seem to think that their own choices are the only valid ones and that it is perfectly acceptable to judge and publicly condemn those who make different choices.

Spot on fella.....
And I dont think Ben was referring to you Vampy :-)
No I agree Steve.
I`m not sure what the point of the thread is?
Asking about promiscuity on a swingers site where people enjoy gangbangs and mutiple play, and why the hell not if that is why you are here.
I think most people off this site choose who they will play with, isn`t that the point of profiles, pics, chat etc, even in clubs people have the choice who to engage with, even tho we dont swap we still like to socialise and meet people for certain types of fun.
I don`t think its right that you are always so derogatory about others and what others choose to do.
My opinion and I`m sticking to it.
Everyone on here who is active is promiscuous, unless of course you dont have casual sex and just date fellow swingers, although curiuos to know how being promiscuous means you cannot have standards or cannot say no?
Quote by Ben_welshminx
Far more attractive than those who seem to think that their own choices are the only valid ones and that it is perfectly acceptable to judge and publicly condemn those who make different choices.

Well said that man!! :thumbup: Kind of what I meant only better put!! wink
Quote by mrs-bmw
I`m not sure what the point of the thread is?
Asking about promiscuity on a swingers site where people enjoy gangbangs and mutiple play, and why the hell not if that is why you are here.
I think most people off this site choose who they will play with, isn`t that the point of profiles, pics, chat etc, even in clubs people have the choice who to engage with, even tho we dont swap we still like to socialise and meet people for certain types of fun.
I don`t think its right that you are always so derogatory about others and what others choose to do.
My opinion and I`m sticking to it.

A Swinging Site.........Oh dear, I thought I'd joined a Singing Site !!!
Echoes
Quote by Echoes7
I`m not sure what the point of the thread is?
Asking about promiscuity on a swingers site where people enjoy gangbangs and mutiple play, and why the hell not if that is why you are here.
I think most people off this site choose who they will play with, isn`t that the point of profiles, pics, chat etc, even in clubs people have the choice who to engage with, even tho we dont swap we still like to socialise and meet people for certain types of fun.
I don`t think its right that you are always so derogatory about others and what others choose to do.
My opinion and I`m sticking to it.

A Swinging Site.........Oh dear, I thought I'd joined a Singing Site !!!
Echoes
The choir is thata way>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :angel:
in order to allow people their human rights and given due consideration the debate has gone down the predictable benevolent route. But surely there is more to this?
adults who have a lot of partners are being promiscuous only as far as having a lot of sex. in the world of swinging that would hardly count as an issue. swingers know what the are doing, or at least they should do.
in the conventional world it is considered a 'problem'. being promiscuous is often used to describe irresponsibility with sex.
There are considerably fewer men who can simply wander about and find that they are allowed to have sex easily and without due responsibility with women. So with hetero sex the irresponsibly promiscuous are more often the females. With many instances of promiscuity happening at a vulnerable stage in their lives.
gay sex can allow for male promiscuity with considerable more ease. again its a phase they go through at some point if they so desire.
whilst the benevolent attitude is admirable, it conveniently overlooks the consideration of sexual health. with the irresponsible getting and spreading whatever is out there. added to this is the complication of damaging people's emotions.
Meeting responsible, sexually confident and capable players is fun and fulfilling. They are lovely and get respect.
The opposite is an unpredictable risk taker who can bring misery and illness. That isn't attractive.
Quote by duncanlondon
in order to allow people their human rights and given due consideration the debate has gone down the predictable benevolent route. But surely there is more to this?
adults who have a lot of partners are being promiscuous only as far as having a lot of sex. in the world of swinging that would hardly count as an issue. swingers know what the are doing, or at least they should do.
in the conventional world it is considered a 'problem'. being promiscuous is often used to describe irresponsibility with sex.
There are considerably fewer men who can simply wander about and find that they are allowed to have sex easily and without due responsibility with women. So with hetero sex the irresponsibly promiscuous are more often the females. With many instances of promiscuity happening at a vulnerable stage in their lives.
gay sex can allow for male promiscuity with considerable more ease. again its a phase they go through at some point if they so desire.
whilst the benevolent attitude is admirable, it conveniently overlooks the consideration of sexual health. with the irresponsible getting and spreading whatever is out there. added to this is the complication of damaging people's emotions.
Meeting responsible, sexually confident and capable players is fun and fulfilling. They are lovely and get respect.
The opposite is an unpredictable risk taker who can bring misery and illness. That isn't attractive.

I am, by some people's definition, promiscuous. I am less promiscuous now than when I was younger, when I was, to be honest, a total slut.
Am I attractive? Fuck knows.
However, I have self respect, and a clear understanding of why I do, what I do. That'll do for me, and other people seem to be at ease with that.
My mother, several tabloid newspaper editors, and probably some of the people in this thread, don't seem to get that the only over-riding principle is 'do no harm' (S&M doesn't count :-) ).
People who judge those they stigmatize as unduly promiscuous will probably do more harm, over time, than I will. No-one's ever hanged themselves for shagging me (though they may have had regrets in the morning) but prurient criticism in the press of 'promiscuous' behaviour has had precisely that effect on a friend of mine.
OK, high horse back in stable now.
Quote by awayman
[
Am I attractive? Fuck knows.
However, I have self respect, and a clear understanding of why I do, what I do. That'll do for me, and other people seem to be at ease with that.

Hell yes!!! kiss And that goes back to what i was saying about attitude. I was attracted to because of your attitude long before I saw what you look like.
And (not sure how to quote twice yet) Duncan made an excellent point about sexual health. Personally I always always always use a condom with any other partner than my own. Its an unnegotiable rule. But there are many for whom bareback with swinging parnters is perfectly acceptable. Thats up to them, it wont do for me.

I dunno, there are no pics on your profile!!! lol
Quote by vampanya
Im certainly not judging or condeming anyone elses choices. I dont have a problem with anyone elses promiscuity. Far from it. All Im trying to say is that for me personally i dont want to be 'any hole's a goal' for someone. I like to think that that someone actually wants to play with me.

we`re inclined to lean towards this as sometimes it seams like desperation having the morals of an ally cat is not attractive at all
there needs to be a little chasing. flirting. sexual tension
and we don`t jump into the sack with someone who we are just not attracted too for the hell of it
Promiscuity = desparation??? no, I dont think so. I think it might more accurate to say the ones who want to be promiscuos but perhaps arent who are far more desparate. The ones in chatroom who dont want to waste 10 minutes getting to know you if theres no chance of a shag the same day.
And as some have rightly pointed out this is hardly the place to call into question sexual morals! Each to their own.
I agree with the last statement 100% though.
Quote by Ben_welshminx
Far more attractive than those who seem to think that their own choices are the only valid ones and that it is perfectly acceptable to judge and publicly condemn those who make different choices.

What he said ^^^
Also you can't consider promiscuity as being an independent occupation. It flourishes with the assistance of other people. So people become promiscuous as their popularity and reputation grows.
And that is where someone who is a sexual 'success story' is loved and understood or becomes a monster whom people begin to despise.
So the rise of a promiscuous person is inevitably the result of a combined effort. How else can they get to that position?
So the attractiveness is there either by strength of personality or through reputation and word of mouth reporting.
So at what point does it turn sour? when human fraility shows through and people begin to disbelieve? poorly managed emotions? infections? demands for reward?
Sour grapes, the person scorned, self realisation, age etc. will bring the period of promiscuity to an end.
No I don't think they are and avoid them on here and elsewhere.
We tend to be a bit more fussy, maybe that is why meets are hard to find. dunno
Even though we swing...we have standards and rather high ones.
We would never " fuck " unless there was an attraction there to begin with. Whilst some may fuck anyone just to get a shag, that to me shows a bit of low self esteem. But I am not judging others sexual behaviour, we have our guidelines laid down, and we never break them....it has worked for us.
Swinging is of course about the sex but we would never swing with people we did not find attractive to start with....first impressions and all that.
Quote by brucie
Far more attractive than those who seem to think that their own choices are the only valid ones and that it is perfectly acceptable to judge and publicly condemn those who make different choices.

like so many said, beautifully put, but you are starting to sound like a scratched record with your 'extreme liberalism and unswerving acceptance'.
what are you doing if not judging and publicly condemning with your snidy comment?
He is giving an opinion without using insulting language like 'bottom dwellers'. Simples.
Quote by brucie

He is giving an opinion without using insulting language like 'bottom dwellers'. Simples.

and thus judging me by my use of "insulting" language.
dont forget that most 'chavs' wear that name as a badge of honour. so is it an insult? or just a statement?
also unc, dont be so naive, bens comment was no opinion, it was a badly disguised dig.
Incorrect. I was judging you by your use of insulting language, not being as 'excessively liberal' as Ben. And I'm not naive enough to believe the dig was disguised in the slightest.