Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Bareback ?

last reply
83 replies
8.0k views
2 watchers
0 likes
Quote by Unc

How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...

Condoms can split, I guess dams can too. Genital warts can be passed by intimate contact with areas not covered by a condom. Obviously their use greatly reduces the risk but it doesn't remove it.
Rather like crossing the road, if you keep your eyes and ears open you are less likely to be run over than if you are wearing an ipod turned up high and a blindfold:-)
This is partly true, and I agree with the final statement.
However the HIV virus, which is the one that most people seem worried about, is blood born, so condoms and dental dams only offer partial protection.
For instance if you'd received a facial and you had some minor cuts on your face, there would be a significantly higher chance of contracting the disease than unprotected vaginal sex. The virus is very fragile and so needs specific and sustained conditions for successful transmission.
There are far more dangerous viruses already out there that don't get this kind of media coverage, unfortunately they are more common in so-called third world countries. The only reason HIV has risen to the top of the list, despite ravaging third world communities for decades and to a lesser extent to gays as well, is that White American Males became infected.
Biased? The data permits such an interpretation.
It's fair to say that it is down to individual choice as to whether or not someone does bareback, hopefully the majority of folks on here would state clearly, even at a meet, what their stance on it was and feel confident enough to stick to that.
Going back to a point made earlier in the thread and coming from the gay community I find the concept of "bug chasing" alarming Although it is prevalent in only in gay men at the moment, there's nothing to say that others wouldn't make the same choices at some point on the future so deliberate infections might not be as far fetched as they seem.
Personally we as a cpl only go barebake with eachother, when we do play we always protect ourselves! its both the pratical reasons and also personal ones too.. we decided this right from the start and if the guys are decent they respect your wishes and have no problem in wearing protection! wink
Quote by Plimboy
I can remember when custard power used to come in assorted packs of six flavours from "Brown and Poulsons" - I liked the strawberry as a boy - happy days biggrin
Plim rolleyes

Oh dear - how did this answer end up here - has the posting system failed again.
Plim :cry:
Quote by jaymar

The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests).

The only way to protect yourself 100% from STIs is to abstain from sexual activity entirely sad....even using condoms and dams still allow a certain amount of risk.
How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...
Something that was told to us when we was updating our training in sexual health was that you can catch STi's in the mouth.....like gonneria (I think that was one of theones she mentioned). You get a really bad sore throat and probably wouldnt realise what it is. Then you can pass it on via kissing...
I cant remember al the details now or ask as Ive left my proffession. Anyone confirm it? Or know anything? I know we were a little taken aback when we were first told it...
Quote by anais

The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests).

The only way to protect yourself 100% from STIs is to abstain from sexual activity entirely sad....even using condoms and dams still allow a certain amount of risk.
How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...
Something that was told to us when we was updating our training in sexual health was that you can catch STi's in the mouth.....like gonneria (I think that was one of theones she mentioned). You get a really bad sore throat and probably wouldnt realise what it is. Then you can pass it on via kissing...
I cant remember al the details now or ask as Ive left my proffession. Anyone confirm it? Or know anything? I know we were a little taken aback when we were first told it...
You're right Anais. This is because soreness or inflammation of any kind tends to thin the area affected which makes it easier for the virus to get through.
It's interesting how cavalier we are about all the other STDs when HIV is one of the least infectious.
:shock: :shock: :shock:
I'm pleasantly surprised about the opinion on this thread. We've always practiced safe sex, and insisted on condoms, but when we've been to swinging clubs, it never ceases to amaze me how many people are more then happy to get involved in group sex without wearing condoms.
I do hate the damn things, but in my opinion they are a necessary evil. That's not to say I criticise others who don't use them, because as other posters have said, we all have the right to exercise our own free will.
Jane xx
Back in the 1960s when I started, there wasn't the same level of risk that there is today.
Plim :violin: :violin: :violin:
Quote by Plimboy
Back in the 1960s when I started, there wasn't the same level of risk that there is today.
Plim :violin: :violin: :violin:

Sorry Plim, I have to disagree, there's always been the same level of risk, but back then it was ignorance that prevented you from knowing about it.
Syphillis has been around for centuries to name but a few.
i and all the friends that i know must have had charmed lives as a beer drinking non drug taking bloke i have never had nor known of any disease that myself or close friends have had(before the smart ones ask some of us have actually had sex more than once! and not with each other!!)from a personal point of view i have never asked a new girlfriend to take a test nor have i ever been asked to take one!
personally i hate condoms but can see why people insist on them in a swinging environment however if you meet a new partner when and how do you approach the subject of tests etc ????
Quote by jaymar

The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests).

The only way to protect yourself 100% from STIs is to abstain from sexual activity entirely sad....even using condoms and dams still allow a certain amount of risk.
How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...
Well I'm not an expert but there are sexual diseases that can be transferred by skin to skin contact not just passing of fluids, my knowledge of it is that HIV can be passed by bodily fluids therefore condoms will safeguard again it unless they split. Other STI's can be passed by other means and condoms do not protect against them.
Though obviously any infections are nasty and to be avoided preferably. Though in the end HIV (when we're talking sex typey sort of nasties) is not curable at present, but a lot of the others are. I'll happily stand to be corrected though, as i really don't know enough.
And as to the bit about ...White American males ...... yeah totally agree. Though the flip side of that, perversly, is that the drugs to combat HIV may well become available faster and eventually someway down the line hundreds of millions of people might benefit. Not quite the way it should be admitted. Quite wrong really confused
Quote by jaymar
Back in the 1960s when I started, there wasn't the same level of risk that there is today.
Plim :violin: :violin: :violin:

Sorry Plim, I have to disagree, there's always been the same level of risk, but back then it was ignorance that prevented you from knowing about it.
Syphillis has been around for centuries to name but a few.
Agreed - didn't Henry the eighth die of gonorrhoea?
there is no other reason than our personal protection to use condoms. anyone who doesn't want to can sod off!

A very sound view. That is our view as well.
Quote by Freckledbird
Back in the 1960s when I started, there wasn't the same level of risk that there is today.
Plim :violin: :violin: :violin:

Sorry Plim, I have to disagree, there's always been the same level of risk, but back then it was ignorance that prevented you from knowing about it.
Syphillis has been around for centuries to name but a few.
Agreed - didn't Henry the eighth die of gonorrhoea?
lol don't think so, gout and over eating apparently, but he did have syphillis
Quote by jaymar

The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests).

The only way to protect yourself 100% from STIs is to abstain from sexual activity entirely sad....even using condoms and dams still allow a certain amount of risk.
How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...
even so they are still only 99.9?? % safe and that is going on them being put on correctly used with oral anal etc however small it is still a risk
I have to say that this is one of the least judgemental & open-minded versions of this debate that I've ever seen! Congratulations all. Maybe the poing I always want to make in them will actually get discussed this time...
It seems to me that the swinging environment is actually one in which the use of effective barrier protection becomes almost impossible. As previously mentioned almost no-one uses dental dams and the use of gloves hasn't even come up (unless I missed it somewhere). In any situation, especialy where there is more than one woman involved it is extremely unlikely that truly safe sex will be the result. For example, take the case of an MMFF scenario:
If both women are Bi they are likely to finger each other and probably themselves creating a transmission vector and both guys will add finger-bound vectors, too. If F1 fists F2 then give her own fella a hand-job she creates another. Add toys (how many use condoms on those?)and there's yet another vector, especially if they're used anally; they could be in four people and up to 10 orifices! M1 has intercourse with his own partner and then, being responsible, wears a condom to penetrate F2. He could easily have vaginal fluids on his balls and rub those into F2 even wearing a condom. During the evening M1 gives F2 a facial creating possible transmission vectors through any small cuts she may have or in the eyes if his cum gets in them. M2 pulls out of F1, takes off his condom to cum on her ass. It's likely to trickle into her ass (I've often seen it rubbed into it at this point) or pussy -yet another vector. What if, say, F2 is a squirter and squirts over F1? It's more than likely that F1 will be shaved and could have nicks from shaving - another vector.
How are these preventable? Only by wearing condoms, using dams & wearing surgical gloves and changing them every time partners are changed, washing toys, applying the same rules or not sharing them.
Now be honest. How many of you could even consider being that thorough? If you did could you actually follow it through?
Am I saying we shoudn't bother? No. Just that there are a lot more risks than most folk consider and HIV is, as has been mentioned, probably the least likely of our worries as far as STIs are concerned.
Quote by targaid
I have to say that this is one of the least judgemental & open-minded versions of this debate that I've ever seen! Congratulations all. Maybe the poing I always want to make in them will actually get discussed this time...
It seems to me that the swinging environment is actually one in which the use of effective barrier protection becomes almost impossible. As previously mentioned almost no-one uses dental dams and the use of gloves hasn't even come up (unless I missed it somewhere). In any situation, especialy where there is more than one woman involved it is extremely unlikely that truly safe sex will be the result. For example, take the case of an MMFF scenario:
If both women are Bi they are likely to finger each other and probably themselves creating a transmission vector and both guys will add finger-bound vectors, too. If F1 fists F2 then give her own fella a hand-job she creates another. Add toys (how many use condoms on those?)and there's yet another vector, especially if they're used anally; they could be in four people and up to 10 orifices! M1 has intercourse with his own partner and then, being responsible, wears a condom to penetrate F2. He could easily have vaginal fluids on his balls and rub those into F2 even wearing a condom. During the evening M1 gives F2 a facial creating possible transmission vectors through any small cuts she may have or in the eyes if his cum gets in them. M2 pulls out of F1, takes off his condom to cum on her ass. It's likely to trickle into her ass (I've often seen it rubbed into it at this point) or pussy -yet another vector. What if, say, F2 is a squirter and squirts over F1? It's more than likely that F1 will be shaved and could have nicks from shaving - another vector.
How are these preventable? Only by wearing condoms, using dams & wearing surgical gloves and changing them every time partners are changed, washing toys, applying the same rules or not sharing them.
Now be honest. How many of you could even consider being that thorough? If you did could you actually follow it through?
Am I saying we shoudn't bother? No. Just that there are a lot more risks than most folk consider and HIV is, as has been mentioned, probably the least likely of our worries as far as STIs are concerned.

I think this is an excellant, well thought out post. I'm sure I'll not be alone.
Quote by jaymar
I think this is an excellant, well thought out post. I'm sure I'll not be alone.

I agree and it does introduce a lot of variables that probably many would experience during the course of their swinging activities...
I'm not sure how many would go to the lengths required to totally eliminate and possibility of contamination though dunno
I think perhaps to reduce the feeling of sterility in many situations a lot of the measures mentioned would be forgone :dunno:
Quote by Steve

I think this is an excellant, well thought out post. I'm sure I'll not be alone.

I agree and it does introduce a lot of variables that probably many would experience during the course of their swinging activities...
I'm not sure how many would go to the lengths required to totally eliminate and possibility of contamination though dunno
I think perhaps to reduce the feeling of sterility in many situations a lot of the measures mentioned would be forgone :dunno:
You're quite right, if we followed 100% to rule the whole scene would end up being 'clinical'. I think the enjoyment would disappear, sadly.
Quote by targaid
I have to say that this is one of the least judgemental & open-minded versions of this debate that I've ever seen! Congratulations all. Maybe the poing I always want to make in them will actually get discussed this time...
It seems to me that the swinging environment is actually one in which the use of effective barrier protection becomes almost impossible. As previously mentioned almost no-one uses dental dams and the use of gloves hasn't even come up (unless I missed it somewhere). In any situation, especialy where there is more than one woman involved it is extremely unlikely that truly safe sex will be the result. For example, take the case of an MMFF scenario:
If both women are Bi they are likely to finger each other and probably themselves creating a transmission vector and both guys will add finger-bound vectors, too. If F1 fists F2 then give her own fella a hand-job she creates another. Add toys (how many use condoms on those?)and there's yet another vector, especially if they're used anally; they could be in four people and up to 10 orifices! M1 has intercourse with his own partner and then, being responsible, wears a condom to penetrate F2. He could easily have vaginal fluids on his balls and rub those into F2 even wearing a condom. During the evening M1 gives F2 a facial creating possible transmission vectors through any small cuts she may have or in the eyes if his cum gets in them. M2 pulls out of F1, takes off his condom to cum on her ass. It's likely to trickle into her ass (I've often seen it rubbed into it at this point) or pussy -yet another vector. What if, say, F2 is a squirter and squirts over F1? It's more than likely that F1 will be shaved and could have nicks from shaving - another vector.
How are these preventable? Only by wearing condoms, using dams & wearing surgical gloves and changing them every time partners are changed, washing toys, applying the same rules or not sharing them.
Now be honest. How many of you could even consider being that thorough? If you did could you actually follow it through?
Am I saying we shoudn't bother? No. Just that there are a lot more risks than most folk consider and HIV is, as has been mentioned, probably the least likely of our worries as far as STIs are concerned.

I am going to say yes you are right, but I will still be using a condom. Gloves, there is a place in the US, which encourages the use of gloves, and somehow that snap of latex on the wrist...
However I do take the point.