Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Bareback ?

last reply
83 replies
8.0k views
2 watchers
0 likes
I think the problem lies in the fact that STIs are effectively invisible and take time to show, if they show at all. So if you have sex with someone it is almost impossible that you could tell if they already had one.
If you go bareback you risk picking up something they didn't know they had. Or passing on something you don't know you had.
I prefer sex without a condom - I think 99% of people do. But I'd rather lose 10% of the pleasure than 10 years of my life.
A lifestyle choice of bareback sex with people whose history you don't know (the definition of swinging) is a choice to catch something. Each encounter carries a risk, 10 encounters carry 10 times that risk. How many encounters does it take to pretty well guarantee you get something? I don't know but I bet many people on here have already had more than that number. Luckily most people (I believe) use condoms.
The only way any of us KNOW we are clear is if we haven't had sex since the last 2 STI tests 3 months apart. How many of us can say we are in that position?
we are great friends with a couple, we met at a swinging party and we have been top friends since.
we have got to a point, were we play bare back, with any others we all condom up.
The odd thing its more friendship now than sex so even though we see them most weekends we hardly have sex with them
I think it is terrifying that people play bareback but do see others point that it is a personnal choice. However i wonder how many of those on the moral high ground use condoms for oral sex? Although a smaller risk - std's can still be spread by oral for both males and females. I know i havent asked a male to wear a condom whilst doing that.
well im in agreement with everyone else who has answered this thread and said your are either a risk taker or fool for playing bareback..
if you play bareback you are not only playing with your own life ,you bare also playing with the life of the others you play with...
you can take the risk with your own life if you play bareback,but why take the risk with someone elses life...
so of you have no conscience go ahead and take the risk with your own life but not no one elses ......
We comment on this thread (for now) beyond saying,
I am sorry, but it is everyones responsibility to be safe, it takes two people to have sex, wether couples or whatever. We always use condoms and if someone doesn't want to, well they won't be having sex with them.
But it is just as much for them to insist upon them themselves.
We all our responsible for our own choices. Everyone knows the risks by now.
hi all just read all the posts and I would like to point out 2 things
1. I would much rather someone tell me that they are into bareback sex then I have a choice! and as for all these ppl who take the high ground have you ever had a condom split! I know I have!!!
2. HIV is NOT an STD it is a BLOOD virus it can be caught during sex if and only if there is BLOOD contact!
so how many of us are as parinoid about dressing cuts, handleing sharps,(knives,cracked cups ect)
HIV is a pussy virus! it takes 10 to 20 years to kill you! if you want to be scared start thinking about ebola!
Get some perspective and dont decry people who let you know how they play from the outset wink
over to you!!..... :!:
Ok so I don't get arsey about much and Will I really do believe in safe sex and the advocating of such. Which I do whenever the occasion arises that I have a chance too. What I do take a little exception to is that Aids is a 'pussy' virus. tell that to the 22.5 million infected in subsaharan Africa oh yes Ebola is nasty indeed the last outbreak killed 160 in Uganda. Compared to the 1.5 million infected with HIV.
Do you know no one or family who has been affected with this virus. Whatever or however you look upon it its a death sentance.
As for STD's read sexually transmitted - to me that means transmitted sexually and accordingly List of STD's
STDs are divided into several groups according to their pathogenic causes:
BACTERIAL:
# Chancroid (Haemophillius ducreyi); # Chlamydia infection (Chlamydia trachomatis); # Donovanosis (Granuloma inguinale or Calymmatobacterium granulomatis); # Gonorrhea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae); # Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) (Clamydia trachomatis serotypes L1, L2, L3) # Non gonococcal urethritis (NGU) (Ureaplasma urealyticum or Mycoplasma hominis); # Syphilis (Treponema pallidum); etc.
VIRAL:
# Cytomegalovirus; # Hepatitis B; # Herpes /HSV (Herpes simplex virus); # Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV/AIDS); # Human Papilloma Virus (HPV); # Molluscum (MC); # Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS); etc.
Sometimes I admit to being a little borderline loopy with my ideas. But i can't, I just cant see validity in arguing a case for bare backing.
As for choice Ok in a perfect world that seems to make sense but in the real one confused If a person cheats on the spouse and joins in the swinging (or non-swinging) world has knowledable unprotected intercourse and then goes home to their spouse who is ,and read, 'unknowing' and their is an infection tbh whether HIV or any of the other STD's then the 'unknowing' party is wholly an innocent victim.
As for knowing the risks....We still have a duty I feel not to become complacent and to inform and teach even if it is reiterating over and over again.
I hust hope you can see where i and others are coming from
Respect Willwill :thumbup:
Quote by Lost
If a person cheats on the spouse and joins in the swinging (or non-swinging) world has knowledable unprotected intercourse and then goes home to their spouse who is ,and read, 'unknowing' and their is an infection tbh whether HIV or any of the other STD's then the 'unknowing' party is wholly an innocent victim.

With you on that one Lost mad :x :x
I understand what you are saying and everyone is responible for their sexual helth!!
My point is that hiv/aids is NOT a STD as say clap or sif which aint nice either.
HIV/AIDS is a DEATH SENTENCE! and anyone wowho takes such a risk must do so with ALL the facts- and altho HIV can be spread by sex it is not a STD (a sexualy transmited desese)it is a heamatological retrovirus the std side of the virus is thru blood entering other bodily fluids!
this is a very real risk but no more than coming in contact with anyone elses blood!!
It is easy to call it an STD and say it is the fault of gays and other devients! by the way thats you and me!!!
as for it being incuable did you know that AZT is givin in the rest of the world to any health care worker who has a sharps injury, this is because AZT kills the virus in the first 3/5 days after infection in the same way as cymo works on canser, but in this country we only give it to health workers who come in contact with known HIV pos ppl!
As I sais if you are going to be parinoid do it accross the board!!!
and please dont join in the demonisation of a small minority as we are all open to being picked on too!
and if you are going to pontificate about a killer virus pick on the vector and ALL its methods of transmition not just 1! as this only plays into the hands of those who would tell us all not just how to live but how to think!!
my rant over I think we shud all play safe!!
however having said that I climb and free climb shude I be banned as I risk my life and those that would have to come out and pick up the pieces if I fall!!
to you again...... wink
please note my comments have nothing to do with lying cheating gits of any sex!they are scum and shud be treated as such
my beef is with HIV being labled as an STD and therefore a "sin" in the eyes of the god squad and their ....... you get the idea
I don't understand these people either, it is not something you should be playing with.
I wonder if they've spent the last 20 years unaware of this world
If people wish to go bareback and be confident they don't have a problem, then they should all visit the clinic at the same time and share results.
This might seem a clinical and far too practical thing to consider. But if its important, you should do it.
Or is that too difficult for some folks?
Oh bloody hell not ANOTHER bare back thread biggrin
How many of you people used condoms and dental dams for oral sex? genital warts, for exampl,e is passed thro oral sex and is one of the STDs that on the rise because people are that focused on safe full sex they seem to forget about oral, you either cover up fully in all aspects of sex or you stop preaching to other, other wise your just a hypocrite wink
I think being sexually active with a number of partners without taking precautions against disease or infestation is a pretty stupid thing to do.
I woudlnt do it but if people are aware of the risks and choose to behave in such a manner who am I to judge them for it.
I suppose I could bleat that such behaviour is "costing us the tax payer millions" but frankly thats a nonsense argument when you think about the amount of health care that has to be provided becuase people acceept the risks of:
motoring
drinking
eating
smoking
for example.
And I dont like posts that contain the "oh no not another thread about" comment. Imagine yourself in a pub and somebody starts a converstaion that youve had before. Do you
A Say oh Ive had this converstaion before do shut up.
B Say oh yes I was talkin to some friends about this recently and carry on to give your slightly more informed and considered opinion
C Wander off and find another converstaion taht interests you more.
Id suggest that A is downright rude and happens far too often on forums. B and C are perefectly acceptabel to me.
its not a case of being rude i put the smiley face on the end to try and keept it light hearted wink
But honestly how many times does this subject have to be covered? if you dont like bare back use condoms, if you do dont use them, what else is there to say?? what other people do is nothing to do with anyone else why does everyone feel they need to have a opinion on what others are doing?
Looks like we agree on the thread subject Naughty.
Apologies if I missed the emoticon and came over like a grumpy old sod.
I think the reason folk keep asking this particular question is cos if you are taking risks or thinking about taking them you feel a hell of a lot more comfortable doing it if you know lots of other people are taking those risks too.
Safe sex as a swinger isnt soemthing you can usually bring up at work or down the lcola pub or in many other social environments so these forums are a vital outlet for such discussions.
well I think it can be a good thing that threads are repeated as not everyone catches them, I dont search for threads and enjoy reading the new ones, if theres a new thread on and Ive seen another one like then I can choose not to read it,also I dont like reading threads that are pages long as there alot of post in the thread that arnt relevent (flirty posts) or hijacking ( which I have realisedis what im doing ) lol
I also think threads like this I understand can be anoying to some but if it gets people thinking about STD's then surley it can only be a good thing,that said I think most people have a choice and their own views on safe sex or protected sex and if thats what people choose to do then so be it,, who am I to judge
xxxx
Quote by naughtynymphos1
Oh bloody hell not ANOTHER bare back thread biggrin
How many of you people used condoms and dental dams for oral sex? genital warts, for exampl,e is passed thro oral sex and is one of the STDs that on the rise because people are that focused on safe full sex they seem to forget about oral, you either cover up fully in all aspects of sex or you stop preaching to other, other wise your just a hypocrite wink

Totally with you there naughtynymphos1. It's the lack of consistency that drives me mad.
The number of people that bang on about barebacking, then go and have unprotected oral sex?????? They french kiss and do all sorts of things that are equalling as "dangerous" but think nothing of it.
I know people are ultra concerned about AIDS but it is quite difficult to catch. Yes frequent exposure can increase the likelyhood, but it is also easy to avoid if people are sensible.
Furthermore if barebacking isn't your thing, then don't do it … simple! I don't agree with intravenous drug taking, but if someone else is doing it and offers it to me, I just say "no thanks". I'm an adult no one is forcing me.
Quote by bbw_lover
Oh bloody hell not ANOTHER bare back thread biggrin
How many of you people used condoms and dental dams for oral sex? genital warts, for exampl,e is passed thro oral sex and is one of the STDs that on the rise because people are that focused on safe full sex they seem to forget about oral, you either cover up fully in all aspects of sex or you stop preaching to other, other wise your just a hypocrite wink

Totally with you there naughtynymphos1. It's the lack of consistency that drives me mad.
The number of people that bang on about barebacking, then go and have unprotected oral sex?????? They french kiss and do all sorts of things that are equalling as "dangerous" but think nothing of it.
I know people are ultra concerned about AIDS but it is quite difficult to catch. Yes frequent exposure can increase the likelyhood, but it is also easy to avoid if people are sensible.
Furthermore if barebacking isn't your thing, then don't do it … simple! I don't agree with intravenous drug taking, but if someone else is doing it and offers it to me, I just say "no thanks". I'm an adult no one is forcing me.
I agree with both of you.
Few notes I'd like to add.. it's STD is fast becoming the 'old term' and is rarely used anymore, it's STI - Sexually Transmitted Infection, why? because Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphlis are all bacterial infections that are passed from one to another. The treatment is fast, a course of antibiotics which is why they aren't referred to as diseases anymore.
Chlamydia is still very high in the North. 1 in 10 have the infection without knowing it. You could have had the infection for over 10 years and not realised. Some people show no symptoms.
The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests). Other than that, get tested regularly.
And before I get hounded, I'm not being clever I'm studying this at the moment. :wink:
Quote by jaymar
Oh bloody hell not ANOTHER bare back thread biggrin
How many of you people used condoms and dental dams for oral sex? genital warts, for exampl,e is passed thro oral sex and is one of the STDs that on the rise because people are that focused on safe full sex they seem to forget about oral, you either cover up fully in all aspects of sex or you stop preaching to other, other wise your just a hypocrite wink

Totally with you there naughtynymphos1. It's the lack of consistency that drives me mad.
The number of people that bang on about barebacking, then go and have unprotected oral sex?????? They french kiss and do all sorts of things that are equalling as "dangerous" but think nothing of it.
I know people are ultra concerned about AIDS but it is quite difficult to catch. Yes frequent exposure can increase the likelyhood, but it is also easy to avoid if people are sensible.
Furthermore if barebacking isn't your thing, then don't do it … simple! I don't agree with intravenous drug taking, but if someone else is doing it and offers it to me, I just say "no thanks". I'm an adult no one is forcing me.
I agree with both of you.
Few notes I'd like to add.. it's STD is fast becoming the 'old term' and is rarely used anymore, it's STI - Sexually Transmitted Infection, why? because Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphlis are all bacterial infections that are passed from one to another. The treatment is fast, a course of antibiotics which is why they aren't referred to as diseases anymore.
Chlamydia is still very high in the North. 1 in 10 have the infection without knowing it. You could have had the infection for over 10 years and not realised. Some people show no symptoms.
The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests). Other than that, get tested regularly.
And before I get hounded, I'm not being clever I'm studying this at the moment. :wink:
with you there jay but as for dams i dont think they make a non latex verity so for me on that one i'm a bit stuck :cry:
Quote by Garfield1
with you there jay but as for dams i dont think they make a non latex verity so for me on that one i'm a bit stuck :cry:

Yes they do. I Googled 'non latex dental dams':
I once met non-latex-Verity, myself sporting something rather shiney and tight at the time, being very pro-latex.
strangely, we never got along
lp
Quote by LondonPlaything
I once met non-latex-Verity, myself sporting something rather shiney and tight at the time, being very pro-latex.
strangely, we never got along
lp

:giggle: :giggle: :giggle:
Quote by jaymar
The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests).

The only way to protect yourself 100% from STIs is to abstain from sexual activity entirely sad....even using condoms and dams still allow a certain amount of risk.
Quote by poshkate

The only way to 100% protect yourself is condoms and dams (as NN rightly suggests).

The only way to protect yourself 100% from STIs is to abstain from sexual activity entirely sad....even using condoms and dams still allow a certain amount of risk.
How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...
it can be those little scuttling blighters that surround the main arena... always on the sidelines... ready to nip....
lp
Quote by jaymar
How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...

Condoms can split, I guess dams can too. Genital warts can be passed by intimate contact with areas not covered by a condom. Obviously their use greatly reduces the risk but it doesn't remove it.
Rather like crossing the road, if you keep your eyes and ears open you are less likely to be run over than if you are wearing an ipod turned up high and a blindfold:-)
I've been to a club when one guy was told by a woman, "you have to have a condom if you want to shag me"
His reply was, "yes here it is, in my hand". He then started to "climb on". Luckily I told the woman that this guy's education level was soooo low he obviously thought that holding the condoom was sufficient protection during sex.
I've also seen several guys put on a condom, start having sex with a lady, then fumble around and remove the condom only to then carry on having sex.
:shock:
Ian
Quote by Unc

How petal? not being funny just curious that's all. They say condoms and dams are safe enough for HIV sufferers to use so I'm just wondering...

Condoms can split, I guess dams can too. Genital warts can be passed by intimate contact with areas not covered by a condom. Obviously their use greatly reduces the risk but it doesn't remove it.
Rather like crossing the road, if you keep your eyes and ears open you are less likely to be run over than if you are wearing an ipod turned up high and a blindfold:-)
Do a bit patchwork quilt affect on a few dams, that'll sort it wink
You can avoid all the mess by containing both participants and the custard inside a large moisture-proof bag. Said bags are available from builders merchants. I would recommend that both people leave their heads outside the bag to facilitate breathing: imagine the inquest...