Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Bareback Sex

last reply
41 replies
4.4k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
I'm curious... how can one advertise for a bareback gangbang and then stipulate that the people attending should be 'clean'?
Is that not a contradiction in terms? dunno

Especially when their profile says they are looking for 'safe' fun rolleyes
maybe their idea of safe is not being caught by their mrs :giggle:
Personally I have mixed feelings on this about a site promoting "bareback" encounters. Where I see this site being a negative is, at least from my perspective irresponsbile sites like this tend to be the precusor to regulation regarding content. By this statement I mean, as more people become aware that such sites exist it will cause upset within the general public and once the general public gets upset it beomces the "flavour of the month" for the news media. Once the news media gets a hold of a story like this then you get politicians throwing out their opinions in order to get the public supporting them. After you get all of this then regulations start coming regarding content.
With that said, I do feel what a couple decides to do when together with other like minded adults, as long it is legal, it is nobody's business except their own. From a personal perspective we would not go bareback unless we knew that person quite well and trusted them. Even then our most likely choice would be to use a condom for everyone's safety.
Quote by Ian

It all boils down to personal choice, but I do think a way of identifying people who go bareback would be an excellent move for the site.

I would also add my weight behind this suggestion. But then others would say that married / single labels should be enforced, or what about the bisexual members who keep becoming straight when it suits them. How many people have I thought 'hubba hubba' only to find out they are 2000 years old....
Trying to label members is an impossible task, so maybe it's just down to using the notes system on people's profiles if you catch something about them that you dislike?
Sorry Ian, didnt explain that one very well. I didnt mean the site label the people, I was meaning that you had the option to put on your profile that you are looking for safe sex, bareback or either (something like a tick box system) and then the option to be able to search for people who had ticked your preference. I know that some people will tick the wrong box and it cannot be guaranteed but it at least gives members the option to show what their preference are.
As for only having safe sex, personally I think the only safe sex is the kind which happens in your head and involves no physical contact with anyone else. We all know there are risks involved in having sex with another person but hopefully, alot of people try to manage these risks and take precautions to reduce them, and if that means using condoms, or trying to identify people who do not use them, then so be it. I would never cross the road without looking both ways, same as I would never have casual sex without a condom.
what i also find a bit odd is a very 'british' attitude has settled in. that is 'making do' with condoms. now bareback is best right? so why are people content in making do when with a little effort they could all get a checkup and go about having the real thing with their new buddies? or is that too much like doing the right thing to do something right?
what seems to be wrong is the continuance of a culture of suspicion and risk. that its your decision to take that risk amongst a society of dodgy characters. is this the best way to enjoy your time?
the idea of a mutual checkup removes the risk, suspicion and worry. much better state of mind in which to enjoy sex?
Quote by duncanlondon
the idea of a mutual checkup removes the risk, suspicion and worry. much better state of mind in which to enjoy sex?

Which is fine if you have a regular sex partner but not if you are having sex with more than one person (or they are having sex with other people). We do have a regular play mate who we have been meeting very regularly for the last three years and all three of us do have regular check ups at our local clinc (and have decided that next time we will all try and make an appointment and go together and make a day of it :twisted:
However, a lot of swingers, including ourselves, may want more than one partner so the checkups are only valid if we never have sex with anyone else out of the 'three-some' situation.
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple

the idea of a mutual checkup removes the risk, suspicion and worry. much better state of mind in which to enjoy sex?

Which is fine if you have a regular sex partner but not if you are having sex with more than one person (or they are having sex with other people). We do have a regular play mate who we have been meeting very regularly for the last three years and all three of us do have regular check ups at our local clinc (and have decided that next time we will all try and make an appointment and go together and make a day of it :twisted:
However, a lot of swingers, including ourselves, may want more than one partner so the checkups are only valid if we never have sex with anyone else out of the 'three-some' situation.
Could people really be trusted?
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
However, a lot of swingers, including ourselves, may want more than one partner

:rascal:
Sorry redface
As you were folks....
well clearly for the high capacity performer such an arrangement is going to be more of a hindrance than an inconvenience. but it could be useful for those who are operating at a more leisurely pace and the end result is bareback all round for those involved. which i would prefer..
I may be the only one that feels it is men that make the most fuss over wanting to feel skin-on-skin. Speaking personally, I prefer a man to wear a condom. It feels the same inside me (maybe I'm a little insensitive I don't know), and makes less mess so the fun can continue over and over again (where can I find a multiple repeater hmmm?). I have to say I can't see the appeal of sloppy seconds, thirds and more, but each to their own........