Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

commercial events - should sh charge for advertising them?

last reply
94 replies
5.0k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Now that sh seem to be condoning commercial events i.e. socials held in houses where the hosts charge entry and make a profit, should there be a separate chargeable forum section to post these in. That way sh can profit from it too and drop the prices for membership?
A small fee of perhaps £20 per add... seems reasonable seeing as though if they charge £15 per single guy and £10 per couple £5 for single women, with 8 guys and 5 couples 3 women turning up thats £185 profit... and that means the £20 fee for the add would be a little over 10% of thier profit!
I think its all about people having enough information in order to make a choice, if there's an event you like the look of, the location is good and the date fits then we believe that its better to have it on the site than not.
Highlighting the point that its commercial or not 'non profit' as many of the events are here, allows people to better understand the organisers motives and to decide if its good value for money.
One day I'd like to see a section for more commercial events, for now we will review them on a case by case basis and if we believe that its actually detrimental to the site may revert back to the way it was. On the other hand if its positive then more reason to expand the idea.
Quote by st3v3
I think its all about people having enough information in order to make a choice, if there's an event you like the look of, the location is good and the date fits then we believe that its better to have it on the site than not.
Highlighting the point that its commercial or not 'non profit' as many of the events are here, allows people to better understand the organisers motives and to decide if its good value for money.
One day I'd like to see a section for more commercial events, for now we will review them on a case by case basis and if we believe that its actually detrimental to the site may revert back to the way it was. On the other hand if its positive then more reason to expand the idea.

If someone is happy to pay £15-20 to go to someones house thats their decision, its not something we'd do. If we were going to have a party at ours we'd invite people and say, bring your own drinks, and if you have a special dietry requirment bring a bit of food, we'd put on our own nibbles lol. Thats why the thread is about charging for the adds, if they are making a profit from it then why shouldnt the site, that way you can reduce the membership costs which will hopefully bring in more members...
I like the thinking but I don't think the numbers would stack up to make any real difference, one of the reasons that we don't charge for club listings.
Most likely it would result in less ads and less choice, but who knows until we try.
Quote by st3v3
I like the thinking but I don't think the numbers would stack up to make any real difference, one of the reasons that we don't charge for club listings.
Most likely it would result in less ads and less choice, but who knows until we try.

I'm surprised St3v3 that there is no charge for club listings, surely that's advertising revenue that's being lost.
A club gets to advertise for free on a site that many members have to pay for and those same members have to pay a not inconsiderable price to attend their advertised events?
Win / win for clubs for sure bearing in mind the membership numbers at SH and possible audience for adverts.
Just an observation, not a criticism.
I didnt think you were allowed to list something that you were going to make money out of.
I'm in the process of trying to organise a munch and the guidlines state that you should only charge enough to cover costs as you are not allowed to make money out of it.
Did I read this wrong?
Quote by Funlovers2009
I didnt think you were allowed to list something that you were going to make money out of.
I'm in the process of trying to organise a munch and the guidlines state that you should only charge enough to cover costs as you are not allowed to make money out of it.
Did I read this wrong?

nope
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/assets/Munch_and_Social_Guidelines.pdf
i read it the same way... but think that if it is to be allowed we should all benefit from lower membership if profit making social adds are charged for...
A munch is non profit.
Quote by st3v3
A munch is non profit.

dont want to be funny steve but it says quite clearly in the rules socials are non profit...
Not for profit?? Yes those are the guidelines, and its been common practice for some people to run social events on a regular basis and make huge profits from them.
Example: We went to a social once, and there was a £5 door charge per person, the nibbles advertised were a bowl of crisps on a few of the tables, it was in a pub that didnt charge for the room hire as they made money over the bar from the 120 or so people that were there. The DJ was an SH member, not entirely sure if he got paid or not.
Now I am no mathmatician, but the figures speak for themselves. The organising member must have made at least £500 clear. These socials were held on a very regular basis.
When I made moves to run a social event, with food (proper food) at a ticket price of £9 per head, with all profit over the costs of the room hire and food going to a children's registered charity I was told it wasnt allowed.
Hmmmmmmm make me think. Better to let SH members benefit than a few disadvantaged kids.
I think to charge people you are inviting into your home is a bit much myself, and as was previously stated, if you are going to a house party, take your own drinks, and food if you have special requirements, then there is no additional cost to the hosts. After all isnt this a social thing, not a business opportunity.
Clubs do make money from the social events SH members organise, and thats their business to do that. Surely members arrange the socials to have a good night out with some of their SH friends. I think it will make life rather complicated if we have to pay for ads for a social event and I think you will find there will be fewer events because of it. Or 'underground' socials will prevail as a result.
Quote by two-4-more
dont want to be funny steve but it says quite clearly in the rules socials are non profit...

Correct, we have bent the rules and as I said earlier we will see how it goes and review on a case by case basis before making any changes to the rules.
Quote by st3v3

dont want to be funny steve but it says quite clearly in the rules socials are non profit...

Correct, we have bent the rules and as I said earlier we will see how it goes and review on a case by case basis before making any changes to the rules.
appologies st3v3... i miss read the post you were replying to i thought she said social... my bad
Quote by goldsmith
Not for profit?? Yes those are the guidelines, and its been common practice for some people to run social events on a regular basis and make huge profits from them.
Example: We went to a social once, and there was a £5 door charge per person, the nibbles advertised were a bowl of crisps on a few of the tables, it was in a pub that didnt charge for the room hire as they made money over the bar from the 120 or so people that were there. The DJ was an SH member, not entirely sure if he got paid or not.
Now I am no mathmatician, but the figures speak for themselves. The organising member must have made at least £500 clear. These socials were held on a very regular basis.
When I made moves to run a social event, with food (proper food) at a ticket price of £9 per head, with all profit over the costs of the room hire and food going to a children's registered charity I was told it wasnt allowed.
Hmmmmmmm make me think. Better to let SH members benefit than a few disadvantaged kids.
I think to charge people you are inviting into your home is a bit much myself, and as was previously stated, if you are going to a house party, take your own drinks, and food if you have special requirements, then there is no additional cost to the hosts. After all isnt this a social thing, not a business opportunity.
Clubs do make money from the social events SH members organise, and thats their business to do that. Surely members arrange the socials to have a good night out with some of their SH friends. I think it will make life rather complicated if we have to pay for ads for a social event and I think you will find there will be fewer events because of it. Or 'underground' socials will prevail as a result.

Maybe sh should charge the clubs to advertise their special events etc boost the clubs attendence by hitting their target market, while helping to cover the cost of the site?
Quote by the_Laird
I'm surprised St3v3 that there is no charge for club listings, surely that's advertising revenue that's being lost.
A club gets to advertise for free on a site that many members have to pay for and those same members have to pay a not inconsiderable price to attend their advertised events?
Win / win for clubs for sure bearing in mind the membership numbers at SH and possible audience for adverts.
Just an observation, not a criticism.

But the good thing about free club listings are the reviews, which I'm sure, first time clubbers/curious people, rely heavily upon.
If clubs had to pay to be on the listing, then they'll start demanding that bad reviews are removed, due to the fact they're paying for the privilage (sp?) of being slagged off.
By the same token, would a private party, that's doing it for revenue, be up for honest reviews. How would they take the bad ones, would they demand the bad reviews be taken down, or would they take it on board and work with what's been said.
Personally, I think that there are too many private parties that are free, to warrant anyone paying £££'s to attend - unless they're only charging the poor buggers the single males???
I don't know, I just got back from the pub, and far too chuffed I done this with no typos!!!!!
And I do know that I love the Laird, and whatever he says is very right!! passionkiss
Even tho I disagreed???????? :confused: Did I just disagree, or did I just agree with Lairdy in a roundabout way but with loads more words......... can't remember what the bluddy ell he said now, was ages ago, been concentrating on typing this lot right to remember anything!!!
kiss
Myself I'd rather see more options listed, be it clubs or socials rather than put charges in as it gives the members here more options on things to do, I'm sure that some clubs do very well out of the relationship but if we were to charge I'm also sure that half of them wouldn't pay anyway which ends up in less choice.
and from another thread that I'd have to say that if I had to limit dinner to 4 Missy would be on my list :angel: I couldn't post in that thread as I wouldn't be able to limit it to 4 blink
As I said Gorgeous, just an observation, not a criticism.
I agree that the reviews are exceptionally important and should be independent. I was referring to advertising of events by Clubs for members to attend on payment.
I wouldn't go to a private party where the organiser was attempting to make profit. That's not a private party in my eyes, it's a commercial venture and if I'm going to pay for a venue to swing in I'd rather hire an executive penthouse somewhere and know who was coming....wanna cum?
xx
ps. The Gorgeous was in reference to Missy St3v3....just in case wink
Quote by Missy
I'm surprised St3v3 that there is no charge for club listings, surely that's advertising revenue that's being lost.
A club gets to advertise for free on a site that many members have to pay for and those same members have to pay a not inconsiderable price to attend their advertised events?
Win / win for clubs for sure bearing in mind the membership numbers at SH and possible audience for adverts.
Just an observation, not a criticism.

But the good thing about free club listings are the reviews, which I'm sure, first time clubbers/curious people, rely heavily upon.
If clubs had to pay to be on the listing, then they'll start demanding that bad reviews are removed, due to the fact they're paying for the privilage (sp?) of being slagged off.
By the same token, would a private party, that's doing it for revenue, be up for honest reviews. How would they take the bad ones, would they demand the bad reviews be taken down, or would they take it on board and work with what's been said.
Personally, I think that there are too many private parties that are free, to warrant anyone paying £££'s to attend - unless they're only charging the poor buggers the single males???
I don't know, I just got back from the pub, and far too chuffed I done this with no typos!!!!!
And I do know that I love the Laird, and whatever he says is very right!! passionkiss
Even tho I disagreed???????? :confused: Did I just disagree, or did I just agree with Lairdy in a roundabout way but with loads more words......... can't remember what the bluddy ell he said now, was ages ago, been concentrating on typing this lot right to remember anything!!!
kiss
I hold regular "Shed Doo's" at my very small house and I am always out of pocket cos I supply all the food and loads of loo paper wink
I do it because I like the people that I call my friends ,to have somewhere safe to have a good time and that's basically it.
We used to have regular socials in Scotland and sometimes they were good value for money but very often it was just a way for the organisers to make a quick buck.
I did, what I believe everyone should do and that is, vote with their feet, if they feel that the organisers are in it for the money then DO NOT GO.. simples. lol
Quote by woohoo
I hold regular "Shed Doo's" at my very small house and I am always out of pocket cos I supply all the food and loads of loo paper wink
I do it because I like the people that I call my friends ,to have somewhere safe to have a good time and that's basically it.
We used to have regular socials in Scotland and sometimes they were good value for money but very often it was just a way for the organisers to make a quick buck.
I did, what I believe everyone should do and that is, vote with their feet, if they feel that the organisers are in it for the money then DO NOT GO.. simples. lol

Damn right! :thumbup:
Personally I don't think charging should be allowed OK its going to go on off site but on site - nope! Condones pay for sex and in the end the most ripped off? Single guys again.
At the end of the day, people vote with their feet regarding charges.
Commercial events will give people more choice.
I don't have a problem with commercial events. Im not too bothered about SH raising money buy advertising or choosing not too. It all adds to choice and choice is good. I would like the rules about this onsite and the nature of events to be very clear though.
Quote by Ben_welshminx
I don't have a problem with commercial events.

I dont either but....
I do have a problem when it is a social event which is meant to be non profit making and is a regular occurrence...
Aye Steve but as long as I know I can make a choice.
I don't mind people making money on an event but more than a few pounds to cover costs, I won't be going.
I also wonder if you are paying for a commercial event, if that means the place has health and safety guidelines and insurance in case anything went wrong dunno
My biggest hope is that allowed commercial events will not reduce the free/cheap socials and munches that we have now confused
Fair points well made Dawnie.
As SH is a commercial enterprise I cannot see any problem with them making money through advertising....whatever that may be.
I also cannot understand why people are having a moan because someone who has organised a munch or social wants to make a few bob.
I know people who have organised such events and it is not a five minute job, to try and make it successful.
Even if people did charge it is only a minimal ammount in the wider scheme of things.
Making a few bob is the name of the game and IF people do not want to pay, then the choice is not to go.....simples.
Quote by kentswingers777
As SH is a commercial enterprise I cannot see any problem with them making money through advertising....whatever that may be.
I also cannot understand why people are having a moan because someone who has organised a munch or social wants to make a few bob.
I know people who have organised such events and it is not a five minute job, to try and make it successful.
Even if people did charge it is only a minimal ammount in the wider scheme of things.
Making a few bob is the name of the game and IF people do not want to pay, then the choice is not to go.....simples.

what do you class a "minimal ammount" a couple of quid each, a fiver... or £20 per single guy... there is making a few quid, and there is making a few hundred...
the socials we have been to charge per person and have buffets with sandwiches, crisps, quiches, pizza's, samosa's etc so you can see where the money goes, and more then likely a charge for the venue.
To have a commercial event at a house, with no food etc advertised and i imagine (although it does not state it) a brink your own drink policy) takes the mick a little. there are no costs... just straight out profit. These are the sort events that definately should be charged for advertising - and are the sort of events that it is very unlikely that you will see us at lol
Quote by two-4-more
As SH is a commercial enterprise I cannot see any problem with them making money through advertising....whatever that may be.
I also cannot understand why people are having a moan because someone who has organised a munch or social wants to make a few bob.
I know people who have organised such events and it is not a five minute job, to try and make it successful.
Even if people did charge it is only a minimal ammount in the wider scheme of things.
Making a few bob is the name of the game and IF people do not want to pay, then the choice is not to go.....simples.

what do you class a "minimal ammount" a couple of quid each, a fiver... or £20 per single guy... there is making a few quid, and there is making a few hundred...
the socials we have been to charge per person and have buffets with sandwiches, crisps, quiches, pizza's, samosa's etc so you can see where the money goes, and more then likely a charge for the venue.
To have a commercial event at a house, with no food etc advertised and i imagine (although it does not state it) a brink your own drink policy) takes the mick a little. there are no costs... just straight out profit. These are the sort events that definately should be charged for advertising - and are the sort of events that it is very unlikely that you will see us at lol
But the choice is still yours to make as to whether you go or not surely?
I would say a charge of between £ up to £ 10 would be reasonable. IF somebody was doing it from their own home, then whatever they deem to be a reasonable figure. I would not want to let my house like that.
As a friend of mine says on many occasions...." choices " and that to me is exactly what everyone has.
People have no problem paying to go to a club?
We used to go to Skinnys and they charged £ 40 per couple and you could not bring your own drinks, and the drinks were pub prices. We went on many occasions and it was OUR choice to pay or not to go.
We thought whilst quite expensive, they are giving up their home for others to have sexual fun. Now you cannot do that in most places so...you pays your money and takes your chances.
If anyone as I have said already thinks they are taking the piss, then don't go. You can keep ya pennies in ya pocket instead.
Quote by kentswingers777
But the choice is still yours to make as to whether you go or not surely?
I would say a charge of between £ up to £ 10 would be reasonable. IF somebody was doing it from their own home, then whatever they deem to be a reasonable figure. I would not want to let my house like that.
As a friend of mine says on many occasions...." choices " and that to me is exactly what everyone has.
People have no problem paying to go to a club?
We used to go to Skinnys and they charged £ 40 per couple and you could not bring your own drinks, and the drinks were pub prices. We went on many occasions and it was OUR choice to pay or not to go.
We thought whilst quite expensive, they are giving up their home for others to have sexual fun. Now you cannot do that in most places so...you pays your money and takes your chances.
If anyone as I have said already thinks they are taking the piss, then don't go. You can keep ya pennies in ya pocket instead.

yes, its peoples choice if they go, and yes its the hosts coice to "let" their house...
but that is not the point... the point being made is should sh charge them to advertise if they are making obvious profit.
It was said earlier in the thread that most people would say a social party at a house with no charge is a party, a party at a house that chages is not a "party" its a comercial (profit making) event and so should be placed in a different section to lets meet up where socials/munches/personal meets are put... maybe in the club meets or maybe a completely new section.
Just a thought...
Clubs are clubs and are built for that specific purpose, but a house is a home unless you choose to run a business from it, i guess that if they are running profit making parties that would class as a business and therefore they may perhaps need public liability insurence and a health and safty certificate of some sort.
Should sh check this out to ensure its members safety... is there any possibilty that if something went wrong that sh could be held responsible for allowing it to be advertised?
SH in my opinion cannot and would not be held responsible IF anything went wrong.
SH are entitled like anyone else is, to make money anyway they deem fit too.
I think SH should allow members to advertise, and for that privilege they should charge them, if that is what they intend to do.
I believe that with a membership the size SH has, the members would be only too happy to pay.
I still cannot see why you are so annoyed about this though. If you feel they are making too much money from any party or social that a member arranges, then once again you have the choice not to go.
Skinnys on an average weekend in my estimation made over £2500, and they held a party every week.
Even though the costs were high there were still plenty of people willing to pay, and I believe that the munches and socials advertised on here, would do the same.