Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

condom wake up call!

last reply
112 replies
8.0k views
1 watcher
0 likes
so here's some more thoughts that are currently on my mind, shooting from the hip again so happy to listen to alternate ones...
mr x takes no precautions, he's riddled with all manner of disease but isn't aware of it, he plays with mrs y, she was of course clean as a whistle till then! no precautions again.. we as a community say we shouldn't judge its up to them
the mind set says for these this is ok. mrs y plays with mrs b who takes care that when she plays she always uses condoms for penetration... so no worries here for her then! I play with mrs b knowing that's how she plays and feel comfortable with how she plays shes Been honest with me and I accept this, we are indulging in low risk some say oral without protection, but hasn't that risk gone through the roof due to mrx and mr y playing in a manner we say we 'should nt 'critiscise, I've simplified this of course for the sake of the thread however that's where my thinking has got to right now... I'm not one for judging anyone but wholesale acceptability of unsafe sex basEd on its their choice and it won't effect me simply can't be right or can it, lets say I was lucky, the infection mrs b has didn't pass to me due to the low risk element of our encounter.... this time..... one other thing, I had it said to me last night ...but we get tested regularly as if that will make a difference to my safety, being tested protects others not the tested! we are currently not playing as a result of these thoughts. possibly down to the 'its ok let them get on
with unsafe sex' community attitude. over zealous at the moment maybe but its bugging me so we switch to red light till we are settle
on our planbof attack.
note this is not condemnation from me because I'm really undecided about this I hope you guys can argue me wrong.
Thanks stagy,
testing is good, but unless we inform all we have played with since the last negative test then we are shutting the stable door after the whole heard has bolted. Even then all the partners most warn all their partners, embarrassing!
Travis
Quote by wild rose and the stag
one other thing, I had it said to me last night ...but we get tested regularly as if that will make a difference to my safety, being tested protects others not the tested! we are currently not playing as a result of these thoughts. possibly down to the 'its ok let them get on
with unsafe sex' community attitude.

Being tested does just mean that you're clearing yourself, yes. The only way to keep yourself clear is to not play at all, or play more safely if you do play.
I really don't think the whole community has the 'let them get on with unsafe sex' attitude though.
Quote by wild rose and the stag
mr x
no precautions, riddled with disease
plays with
mrs y
no precautions
plays with
mrs b
always uses condoms for penetration
I play with mrs b
indulging in some say oral without protection
...but hasn't that risk gone through the roof due to mr x and mrs y?

No. Mrs Y is obviously at significantly increased risk due to her actions, but the risk by the time it gets to you is minimal surely. Do I have the pleasure of addressing Mr Stag or Ms Rose?
The San Fransisco City Clinic ( risk chart suggests that the only thing you can pick up from oral sex on a woman is Herpes, and that this is a rare transmission; and the only thing you can give to someone by doing cunnilingus on them is also Herpes. Herpes is obviously not fun, but I think I'm right in thinking that condoms don't really necessarily protect you from it anyway so given that it's the only thing that could have passed from Mrs Y to Mrs B, your risk level hasn't changed.
If I'm addressing Mr Stag and he's receiving a blowjob from Mrs B, that's again pretty safe for you. Slightly less so for her, but if you don't come in her mouth it's really pretty safe ("extremely low risk" of HIV transmission, for example Again Herpes and genital warts are the main risk.
If you rimmed her you are at slightly more risk, so best not lick anyone's butthole unless you really know where they've been.
We would much prefer to only play with people we trusted; having thought about this a bit we really would prefer to have a closed group of friends that we played with, as this is probably the best way to have group sex with minimal risk.
What other people do is their own affair, I mean it really is none of our business; but we wouldn't feel happy playing with people who do things we don't trust, and we certainly don't approve.
Oh... to go back to what someone said before about people taking it as an insult if you want to use a condom with them - well, fuck them (or rather, don't), if they're not mature enough to let everybody make decisions they feel comfortable with.
WRATS, I do understand where you are coming from with the example you have given, and yes there are major health risks involved with swinging/playing or whatever you want to call it.
But where do we stop? Safe(r) Sex is something that the majority of us agree is essential, there are different views over oral sex, but what about kissing and the risks involved in that?


"Deep kissing carries the same risks as light kissing, plus the exchange of fluids (the aforementioned spit-swapping) increases those risks. It also allows for other sexually transmitted diseases to pass, such as Herpes Simplex Virus-2, Hepatitis B and Syphilis. The trick to dramatically lowering your risks is to really know your partner well, to know their sexual history, and to know their current health status (the couple who gets tested together doesn't get a disease together.... something like that). "
i agree with the fact that other peoples actions do have an impact on us.i would never condem someone for their choices, but it certainly would impact on our choices regarding them.
the way we look at it, our safety is more important that the risk of offending someone.
to be honest its really rare we play, prob 2 or 3 times a year, but then it only takes once to catch someting doesnt it.
we use condoms for sex with other people, not for oral. so i guess there is a risk there. like other people have said, we have weighed up the risks and whilst its not ideal, thats as far as we are willing to take it.
i would not knowingly engage in unprotected oral sex with someone who i knew took more risks than me ( ie sex without condoms) but thats the problem isnt it, the majority of people dont give you their sex cv when you play. and even those who honestly say they dont do bearback, if they have had unprotected oral with someone else who does... its like a domino effect.
it is worrying.
we tend to be tested quite regularly and have been ok up untill now.
fronm the other side of the coin though....
ages ago ( a year or more) we were at a party hosted by a member of this site.
we were upstairs in the playroom with another couple from this site and had engaged in some softswing fun and were then having sex with out own partners.
now me and him dont use condoms between ourselves and so as we had only had sex with each other, and the other couple had only had sex with each other, no condoms were used.
a female half of a couple who may or may not still be members of this site ( i cant be arsed to check) came in the room and commented that we were all disgusting as she had not seen one condom in use during our session!
firstly we put her straight regarding who was with who etc and when she carried on i think i told her in no uncertain terms where she could go.
my question is, does anyone think THAT type of behaviour is acceptable?
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
"Deep kissing carries the same risks as light kissing, plus the exchange of fluids (the aforementioned spit-swapping) increases those risks. It also allows for other sexually transmitted diseases to pass, such as Herpes Simplex Virus-2, Hepatitis B and Syphilis. "

Bugger. We need to find a convent or an abbey, quickly. sad
Quote by Freckledbird
I really don't think the whole community has the 'let them get on with unsafe sex' attitude though.

Hmm. It's a difficult one this though. I mean, I do feel that it's a very individual thing and that sexual behaviour is an area where people don't have the right to judge each other; I don't approve of people playing Russian Roulette in such a flagrant way, and I don't like the fact that hmm, yes actually in contradiction to what I said above, It does increase my level of risk.
However I (we) do feel that we're basically responsible for our own protection here, and that we should be as careful when we're sleeping with people we *think* we trust as we would be with total total strangers. If we assume that anyone we're with potentially has something, then whether or not someone somewhere down the chain has used protection doesn't alter the way you should conduct things - just assume that they didn't use it.
After all - we assumed that we would always use condoms, and then the first time we were with someone we didn't, and the second time the condom broke as he was putting it on.
Hmm so yeah the only way to be totally safe would be to not do it. Life is all about finding the level of risk you are prepared to take for the rewards you want to get, and I suppose it's important for everyone to think about this balance.
I don't really think anyone has the right to judge someone else for taking risks that only affect them. The grey area is when the risk affects other people too - but the person in the room criticising WBB et al for not using condoms had no right I feel.
so... in a nutshell going back to my scenario and taking me out of the equation and replacing mrs b with 'your' wife or anyone elses in particular the practice of mr x and mrs y now adds a whole new dimension to the risk factor... and our safety is based purely on the honesty of the folk we play with and there unknown sexual practices that afternoon , week, month or year etc.. yet we still say its non of our business how they play? and when you next witness this behaviour you turn away and just make a note not to play with them yourselves, forgive the controvercial thoughts but I've taken this too far and to honestly to hold back my ideas now... yes this has been an exercise to get you thinking and yes I've rolled my thoughts along with the responses we have given, I come to the conclusion that I wholeheartedly condemn irresponsible sexual activities openly on here, its not just their choice as it potentially flucks up everyone elses lives as well. if unprotected penatrative sex is the big danger!
staggy
xx
Having sex with any people outside of a monogamous relationship, where both have clear test results, is a risk to your health.
1 To lower the risk you use a condom for penetrative sex.
2 To lower it further you use a condom or dam for oral sex.
3 To lower it further you use a condom on any toys.
4 To lower it further you do not kiss the other people.
5 To lower it further you do not kiss or lick any other part of the other people.
6 To lower it further you use surgical gloves to touch other people.
7 To lower it further you don't swing.
Between 1-7 and depending on what you expect the others to do or not do is your risk factor. That is your acceptance of that risk. For those that do 1-6 any other type of play is irresponsible, those that do 1 only believe those that do none of them irresponsible.
So where is the line drawn to make a person or couple not irresponsible. That is down to the individuals who will be playing. It is their life. They know the risks that are acceptable to them. It shouldn't be down to others to condemn them.
Individuals can only look after themselves not others.
As for tests.......I have been told by many people "we have had tests and we are clear"......but never once have they shown me the test results. People fib, tell porkies or damn well lie........whatever way you look at it, it is down to your own evaluation of the risk to you that will govern the way you want or not want to play.
For penetrative sex to be seen as the "bigger" problem or more risky is starting to sound like Tony Blairs speach before going to war. HIV can be contracted by a variety of sources, some more risky than others, but the risk will be irrelevant if you were the person who contracted it by a lower risk activity. So to condemn only those that did not use condoms for penetrative sex is proverbial person throwing stones in a greenhouse.
The only way to be safe is to have sex with your own partner and give up swinging. If people carry on swinging......then as adults they accept a risk, at whatever level they wish. But if it goes tits up for them then they only have themselves to blame, not others.
Dave_Notts
But surely the greatest risk would be, as i am led to believe not using condoms for penetrative sex. Ok well if that takes out the major factor at least there lies a conscience. My care is not for the 'knowing' swinger but for the unknowing loved one/partner/family that may have to live with the ]consequences of a piece of blatent stupidity. It's not 'upto' them is it!
F*ck me. the crap about its an individuals choice just so pisses me off its like wanting to be everybodies friend. Bollox to that.
Oh and if it was possible to enforce protected intercourse (i know cloud cuckoo land) between people other than your spouse etc then if i was the government i wouldn't hold back
.

Make wearing a condom like breathing - dont think about it just have to do it.
Quote by Lost
But surely the greatest risk would be, as i am led to believe not using condoms for penetrative sex. Ok well if that takes out the major factor at least there lies a conscience. My care is not for the 'knowing' swinger but for the unknowing loved one/partner/family that may have to live with the ]consequences of a piece of blatent stupidity. It's not 'upto' them is it!
F*ck me. the crap about its an individuals choice just so pisses me off its like wanting to be everybodies friend. Bollox to that.
Oh and if it was possible to enforce protected intercourse (i know cloud cuckoo land) between people other than your spouse etc then if i was the government i wouldn't hold back
.

Make wearing a condom like breathing - dont think about it just have to do it.

The greatest risk is by having sex outside of a monogomous relationship, if they are both clear in the first place. So people should give up swinging or having affairs, that is when the problem comes in.
When people say that they only have sex with a condom and only have sex with people who have condoms so we are safe, are living in cloud cuckoo-land. Before they play and after they play you do not know what the other people are doing. It is a strange thing in this world but people lie.......no, they really do.
So if you only partake in a lower risk activity and contract HIV or any other affliction, e.g. oral when one has mouth ulcers, without using a condom then you are not irresponsible or is it ok because you wore it for the higher risk penetrative sex?
Quite simple to me. People will do it no matter what others opinions are, and you have no way of knowing. Your choice is for your own health. You decide what level of risk you are willing to take.
If I was an outsider who was looking in at this debate I would think "F*ck me, the crap about its about condoms just so pisses me off its like wanting to be everybodies friend. Bollox to that, its about having sex with other people not being your partner"
Dave_Notts
so drink driving is ok too? at the end of the day the drivers put themselves at the highest risk, its just one of many ways you can be killed on the road side, to avoid them completely stay away from them,
thankfully over the last few years people have started to take their heads out the sand and have recoognised it is a major risk that needs removing from society, people have started to pour scorn on drunks who drive, it makes a difference to attitudes and the likelyhood of offending, an acceptance of drink driving is like giving a green light to the weak willed thus endangering those that walk the streets with a clear conscience, this is just analogy of social acceptance, people get dragged in to bad behaviour if their peers allow them to, I can see unprotected
penatrative sex is one of many ways that's unsafe but it would seem on here from what I've read it is the major problem, so like drink driving as opposed to driving while a little tired should we just turn a blind eye as it is juat another 'risk', I think we may beg to differ but this is what I call swinging political correctness s p c and to me it takes the you shall not judge too far.
staggy
xx
Quote by wild rose and the stag
I think we may beg to differ but this is what I call swinging political correctness s p c and to me it takes the you shall not judge too far.

:laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove:
This I find extremely funny. This, in my mind, is where the "blame everyone else and not yourself" society has come from. When somebody disagrees with someone then accuse them of political correctness or even SPC.
People can only look after themselves, as they do not know what anybody else is doing.
If you place your arm in a tank with a shark and it bites it off.......who is to blame? The shark or you?
Dave_Notts
Quote by Lost
But surely the greatest risk would be, as i am led to believe not using condoms for penetrative sex. Ok well if that takes out the major factor at least there lies a conscience. My care is not for the 'knowing' swinger but for the unknowing loved one/partner/family that may have to live with the ]consequences of a piece of blatent stupidity. It's not 'upto' them is it!
F*ck me. the crap about its an individuals choice just so pisses me off its like wanting to be everybodies friend. Bollox to that.
Oh and if it was possible to enforce protected intercourse (i know cloud cuckoo land) between people other than your spouse etc then if i was the government i wouldn't hold back
.

Make wearing a condom like breathing - dont think about it just have to do it.

Not in no way saying that condoms shouldn't be worn
But if you was going to enforce protected intercourse if you was government then maybe you should ban some other things also like traffic..
taken from here

The number of deaths each year has hovered around 500 since 1998. ( HIV and AIDS deaths)
taken from here

3,201 deaths in 2005 ( traffic deaths, thats over 6 times greater than people passing away with aids )
Then there is lots of other items that people can die from that DO involve the possibility of harming others.
when you get in your car you are playing with fire, all it takes is for you to get a blow out and you could hit someone on the path.. maybe a child so do you ban cars because of that, would you give YOUR car up just incase?
lots of every day things we do are high risk, as most people say, its the individual's choice.
what you believe in is fine, we all have our limitations, if someone don't practice your level of safety then cool, don't play with them but trying to force your views.. is the wrong way to go about it.
Tony wink
Quote by flower411
I think we may beg to differ but this is what I call swinging political correctness s p c and to me it takes the you shall not judge too far.

:laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove:
This I find extremely funny. This, in my mind, is where the "blame everyone else and not yourself" society has come from. When somebody disagrees with someone then accuse them of political correctness or even SPC.
People can only look after themselves, as they do not know what anybody else is doing.
If you place your arm in a tank with a shark and it bites it off.......who is to blame? The shark or you?
Dave_Notts
Neither !! lol
It`s the person that didn`t put the lid on the shark tank and didn`t put up a sign saying :
"Do not feed your arms to the shark"
:lol: :lol:
:laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove:
Git!!!!
That was a coffee meets screen moment
Dave_Notts
Quote by Lost
F*ck me. the crap about its an individuals choice just so pisses me off its like wanting to be everybodies friend. Bollox to that.

But it is still their choice. Nobody can make anyone play with anyone else, can they? If people choose to have unprotected sex, then they must realise that they may ultimately have to face any consequences.
It's nothing like wanting to be everyone's friend.
Quote by Shaz_n_Tony
...
taken from here

The number of deaths each year has hovered around 500 since 1998. ( HIV and AIDS deaths)
taken from here

3,201 deaths in 2005 ( traffic deaths, that's over 6 times greater than people passing away with aids )
...Tony wink
OK say each AIDS suffer lives 20 years in an infected state. That's 20*500=10000 people out there at anyone time, not a big chance to meet them is it? but do you want to take that chance.
Then again say there are about 30million drivers killing 3,000+ people a year. Where is the greater risk? Yet we put crush zones in cars, air bags and traffic lights on the road. Is a condom so much to ask?
Quote by
...
taken from here

The number of deaths each year has hovered around 500 since 1998. ( HIV and AIDS deaths)
taken from here

3,201 deaths in 2005 ( traffic deaths, that's over 6 times greater than people passing away with aids )
...Tony wink

OK say each AIDS suffer lives 20 years in an infected state. That's 20*500=10000 people out there at anyone time, not a big chance to meet them is it? but do you want to take that chance.
Then again say there are about 30million drivers killing 3,000+ people a year. Where is the greater risk? Yet we put crush zones in cars, air bags and traffic lights on the road. Is a condom so much to ask?
hmmmmm
There is a lot more drivers about than Aids sufferers = more traffic accidents, no matter how you look at it, there is still 6 to 1 traffic deaths to each aids death.
oh and casualties was approximately 271,000
lol 30 million drivers.. is a risk, but its one we all take, nobody starts pointing the finger saying you should stop, its our own choice.
And no, i am not saying i would take the risk, i am only stating that if wearing comdoms was made compulsory because of the risks then other things should be looked at also.
And its not fair to try and force something on someone when you are probably doing something every day that has a higher risk to them around you.. like driving!
Tony :wink:
you can never force the hand, it just wont work, so the making it compulsory argument doesnt stand up, i dont think it was ever intended that way anyhow, a passing comment to show the strength of feeling, lets not get side tracked by it..
you can however encourage safe play, like someone said on another thread just recently quoting someone or other from history but flucked if i can remember, is all it takes is just a few good men to do nothing!
expression of opinion in this community will influence others contrary to what some may think, it does all the time, if the opinion is subdued because we dont want to rub folk up the wrong way then condom anarchy takes place with those that choose that kind of play, it will and does have a knock on effect for all of us, to argue you dont have to play is complete rubbish, i know we dont and you dont etc, but we dont have to do anything do we, the things we choose to do to make our lives as enjoyable or interesting as we can and to openly encourage safe sex and limiting the risk as low as is feesable to carry on partaking in such activities surely should be encouraged, its not about blameing everyone except myself your self etc its about safety within this community, is this not a community, arent their unwritten rules of beahaviour, i think this site alone has plenty you shall not do this you shall not do that, all manner of breaches of the AUP that can get you removed from here for the safety of others, and the ability to carry on swinging in a safe enviroment, yet still we have this SPC of turning a blind eye to what has been sugested as the most serious form of unsafe play...i wont put some little lol characters here as i fail to see the funny side at all in the consequences.
right now im off for a weekend of splashing about in a kayak on Bala, i will be wearing my pfd, and i will be sober as i drive there.. EVEN THOUGH ITS sort of JUST MY RISk, ill consider my passengers and the rescue services that may have to risk their lives to save mine. See a connection anyone.
Enjoy the debate there will never be an answer to this i knew that at the start but it may just encourage some to at least think twice before they fuck themselves to an early grave.
Quote by Shaz_n_Tony
...
taken from here

The number of deaths each year has hovered around 500 since 1998. ( HIV and AIDS deaths)
taken from here

3,201 deaths in 2005 ( traffic deaths, that's over 6 times greater than people passing away with aids )
...Tony wink

OK say each AIDS suffer lives 20 years in an infected state. That's 20*500=10000 people out there at anyone time, not a big chance to meet them is it? but do you want to take that chance.
Then again say there are about 30million drivers killing 3,000+ people a year. Where is the greater risk? Yet we put crush zones in cars, air bags and traffic lights on the road. Is a condom so much to ask?
hmmmmm
There is a lot more drivers about than Aids sufferers = more traffic accidents, no matter how you look at it, there is still 6 to 1 traffic deaths to each aids death.
oh and casualties was approximately 271,000
lol 30 million drivers.. is a risk, but its one we all take, nobody starts pointing the finger saying you should stop, its our own choice.
And no, i am not saying i would take the risk, i am only stating that if wearing comdoms was made compulsory because of the risks then other things should be looked at also.
And its not fair to try and force something on someone when you are probably doing something every day that has a higher risk to them around you.. like driving!
Tony :wink: That's a point, we control our own risks if we can. When someone imposes a risk on others, a risk like driving; then society should control the risk.
Quote by wild rose and the stag
i think this site alone has plenty you shall not do this you shall not do that, all manner of breaches of the AUP that can get you removed from here for the safety of others, and the ability to carry on swinging in a safe enviroment, yet still we have this SPC of turning a blind eye to what has been sugested as the most serious form of unsafe play...i wont put some little lol characters here as i fail to see the funny side at all in the consequences.

So what do you suggest should happen then? The site tell everyone they have to play more safely or be banned? Ban those who refuse to play safely, in the name of safety of other members? There's not really a lot that can be done is there?
People are aware (probably more aware when threads such as this arise) of the risks - it's still down to personal choice, how they play. If you know someone doesn't play as safely as you would like, you avoid them - it's that simple. If enough people shun them, they'll get the message and either play more safely or they'll have to stop.
Quote by
That's a point, we control our own risks if we can. When someone imposes a risk on others, a risk like driving; then society should control the risk.

Now your getting my drift, people won't ever be forced to wear condoms any more than drivers will be forced to drive at 5mph, so why pick on one "risk" when you might be doing something worst yourself!
Evaluate what risks your prepared to take and stay away from them that don't fit your bill, simple really.
Tony wink
And for the record, we believe in condoms for swinging and have never "not" used them apart from with each other.
Quote by Freckledbird

i think this site alone has plenty you shall not do this you shall not do that, all manner of breaches of the AUP that can get you removed from here for the safety of others, and the ability to carry on swinging in a safe enviroment, yet still we have this SPC of turning a blind eye to what has been sugested as the most serious form of unsafe play...i wont put some little lol characters here as i fail to see the funny side at all in the consequences.

So what do you suggest should happen then? The site tell everyone they have to play more safely or be banned? Ban those who refuse to play safely, in the name of safety of other members? There's not really a lot that can be done is there?
People are aware (probably more aware when threads such as this arise) of the risks - it's still down to personal choice, how they play. If you know someone doesn't play as safely as you would like, you avoid them - it's that simple. If enough people shun them, they'll get the message and either play more safely or they'll have to stop.
not suggesting anything more than we cut the "its none of our business" remarks down a tadge..i made those references to highlight the difference we make between the various crimes commited here and the action that was taken, never at any point was i trying to make site policy, theres a difference between asking people to reconsider their feelings towards unsafe players and perhaps instead of just shrugging their shoulders and saying cest la vie making a bit more of, albeit a passive one, stand.
i really am done with this now, cars packed and i only came back to edit the above post, got my pda's mixed up with my pfd's
have fun love to al of you biug thanks to dave for being the fella on my other shoulder and stopping getting carried away and suggesting a public flogging
adiose amigos
staggy
xx
Quote by wild rose and the stag
right now im off for a weekend of splashing about in a kayak on Bala, i will be wearing my pfd, and i will be sober as i drive there.. EVEN THOUGH ITS sort of JUST MY RISk, ill consider my passengers and the rescue services that may have to risk their lives to save mine. See a connection anyone.

Ohhhh I love quizzes.
Is the connection that the firemen use condoms for protection when fighting fires lol
Enjoy the kayaking and get back safe. Top tip.......fish have gills, you don't........bail out if when looking around you see no sky but the bottom of a river biggrin
Dave_Notts
see i have been enjoying seeing the different views here.
i think it boils down to people may not have an obligation to protect themselves and so possibly others, but they probably have a responsibilty to do so.
however, i feel this is a log way from my experience where someone made an assumption, did not know the situation and then had to cheek to insult me/us and our behaviour.
ie suggest we were playing with others unprotected when it was actually only our own partners we were having sex with.
i just feel thats the other side of the "ots our buisness what others do" thing.
personally i wouldnt knowingly play with someone i considered a risk, and i guess appart from using condowms when we play, and hoping that others are as concientious - that all we can do barring not playing at all.
Quote by Freckledbird

i think this site alone has plenty you shall not do this you shall not do that, all manner of breaches of the AUP that can get you removed from here for the safety of others, and the ability to carry on swinging in a safe enviroment, yet still we have this SPC of turning a blind eye to what has been sugested as the most serious form of unsafe play...i wont put some little lol characters here as i fail to see the funny side at all in the consequences.

So what do you suggest should happen then? The site tell everyone they have to play more safely or be banned? Ban those who refuse to play safely, in the name of safety of other members? There's not really a lot that can be done is there?
People are aware (probably more aware when threads such as this arise) of the risks - it's still down to personal choice, how they play. If you know someone doesn't play as safely as you would like, you avoid them - it's that simple. If enough people shun them, they'll get the message and either play more safely or they'll have to stop.
if you even tried to do that all you would get is a situation where more people say they play safe when they don't
Quote by naughtynymphos1

So what do you suggest should happen then? The site tell everyone they have to play more safely or be banned? Ban those who refuse to play safely, in the name of safety of other members?

if you even tried to do that all you would get is a situation where more people say they play safe when they don't
Exactly - I wasn't suggesting that it should happen, by the way!
Quote by Dave__Notts
Having sex with any people outside of a monogamous relationship, where both have clear test results, is a risk to your health.
1 To lower the risk you use a condom for penetrative sex.
2 To lower it further you use a condom or dam for oral sex.
3 To lower it further you use a condom on any toys.
4 To lower it further you do not kiss the other people.
5 To lower it further you do not kiss or lick any other part of the other people.
6 To lower it further you use surgical gloves to touch other people.
7 To lower it further you don't swing.
Between 1-7 and depending on what you expect the others to do or not do is your risk factor. That is your acceptance of that risk. For those that do 1-6 any other type of play is irresponsible, those that do 1 only believe those that do none of them irresponsible.
So where is the line drawn to make a person or couple not irresponsible. That is down to the individuals who will be playing. It is their life. They know the risks that are acceptable to them. It shouldn't be down to others to condemn them.
Individuals can only look after themselves not others.
As for tests.......I have been told by many people "we have had tests and we are clear"......but never once have they shown me the test results. People fib, tell porkies or damn well lie........whatever way you look at it, it is down to your own evaluation of the risk to you that will govern the way you want or not want to play.
For penetrative sex to be seen as the "bigger" problem or more risky is starting to sound like Tony Blairs speach before going to war. HIV can be contracted by a variety of sources, some more risky than others, but the risk will be irrelevant if you were the person who contracted it by a lower risk activity. So to condemn only those that did not use condoms for penetrative sex is proverbial person throwing stones in a greenhouse.
The only way to be safe is to have sex with your own partner and give up swinging. If people carry on swinging......then as adults they accept a risk, at whatever level they wish. But if it goes tits up for them then they only have themselves to blame, not others.
Dave_Notts

Agreed worship
Anyone who does any of the activities from 1 to 6 are taking risks, obviously 1 is the highest risk, but if you take any of them its very hypocritical to judge anyone who takes a slightly higher risk than yourself. All the hypocrites should therefore fit into category number 7.
I don’t condone unprotected sex, but I do condone hypocrites, in an ideal world everyone would use condoms and if they did then this discussion would probably be about dental dams or something else.
But please bear in mind that having unprotected sex doesn’t guarantee an STD or HIV it only increases the risk, The same increased risk as having multiple partners yet some think its ok to judge because they lower the risk themselves.
My advice is look after yourself and let others do likewise, I for one like to see safe sex promoted, but judging people on risk factor isn’t safe sex is it? And neither is Swinging if we’re all honest. Try telling people who have contracted HIV or STDs whilst using condoms, ie through oral, condoms bursting etc or outwith any sexual contact that if they used a condom they would be ok. The only safe sex is no sex?
Its like saying I only smoke 5 cigarettes a day but he/she smokes 20, I was only doing 37 in a 30 zone but he/she was doing 43. Yes it’s a risk and people in all walks of life take these risks every day, like someone pointed out you are more likely to die in a traffic related accident if you drive than you have of contacting HIV through unprotected sex, now weigh the risk factor up, would you rather die instant in a car accident or live for 20 years having HIV? I know what I’d choose. Stick with your own risk factor but while doing so don’t judge others because lowering the risk doesn’t make you any better, but taking no risks does.
Dont forget, there is a link for sexual health on the above left hand corner..... smile