Mr Licks queried how much risk a male is at from cunnilingus, and someone else mentioned that the risk of contracting HIV is "incredibly small" whilst doing so, 2 points I'd like to reply to.
The risk of contracting HIV (afaik) is small in all cases where direct blood contact with the virus does not occur it is far more likely that any of us will have a cut on the mouth (or on the fingers) than we will on our dick. Therefore it is actually more dangerous to have unprotected oral sex than vaginal sex. This is why anal sex & intravenous drug use are such high risk activities.
But my earlier post was more about the risk of cross-infection during group sex & how it is not mentioned in any forum for discussing safe sex. As swingers we are pretty much the last sexual lifestyle choice which is still very much in the closet and therefore our activities are not given ANY coverage in the discussions about sex & STD transmission.
Because of this we as a community assume that the standards which passs for safe sex are the same as they are in the mundane world outside our much more varied sex-lives. For most people being in bed with more than one partner is a fantasy so they don't have to worry about how many orifices they'll penetrate and therefore don't have to think about infecting one partner from another partner whilst potentially remaining safe oneself.
Of course, any viral or bacterial infection will be carried within the vaginal fluid of whichever partner you are inside. Take your fingers, tongue, dick or favourite dildo out of that partner and put it inside another one and you have transferred the infection. It doesn't matter if you're wearing a rubber or not or what the dildo's made of.
So I ask the question again; if we're not going to use things like gloves & dental dams or change them & our condoms between partners is there any real point in wearing them during a group sex situation with more than one female involved. (A gang-bang is, clearly different unless there will be bi-males involved, too)
Further to Judy's comments I did a google using "saliva and AIDS" as keywords. I came up with this link:
Sounds promising, though I've only had a quick glance and haven't checked out the sources
I'm on a research-roll now. Also found this useful website that has lots of info about oral sex and possible HIV transmission:
Again, no idea how credible the sources are.
Having been away for a while I've just logged on and am so happy to see that the tone of conversation seems to have finally dropped the anger that was flying around early in the topic. Judy's comments are very helpful and I'm pleased to hear what she said about saliva.(I do wish & respectfully request that she'd use a smaller point size to cut down the amount of page scrolling, though :small-print: )
Sad to see, though, that once more the entire conversation is about HIV ignoring the far more widespread infections out there and that no one has mentioned the group-sex dynamic I've asked about. Surely this is not an ostrich-effect on this subject? Or should I open a new thread about it? It seemed appropriate here...
I guess I'll add my two pennies worth.
As far a condoms go I prefer in any sexual encounter not to use them. I'm circumcised so perhaps a little less sensitive anyway and I end up going for hours (too long) before reaching utopia (believe it or not). . . . However I wouldn't risk not wearing one without my partner/potential partner having been screaned first . . . I've got gay friends who had met and introduced me to a friend of theirs that contracted HIV through sex. I just wouldn't chance it after chatting to him.
So secondly, as far as I can remember, HIV is a particulary fragile virus. It's denatured by slight changes in temperature and PH. Saliva of course is alkali, and therefore a hostile agent for that reason alone if not among others.
Lets pray none of the members of this site have to come to terms with the change in lifestyle contracting HIV would bring.
Peace.
x
I am very new to this swinging thing but I have to say that If you choose to wear a condom then not only are you respecting your own body but you are also showing a great respect for the person / Persons that you are with. I too have been curcumsised (bad spelling I know) but would not risk my own or any other persons life for the sake of a bit of rubber.
CONDOMS EVERY TIME
Definately every time, not only to protect your own health, but some people might have contracted something they don't know about and won't show itself for years.
Best go by the old adage of 'Better safe than sorry'. Besides, you can get extra large condoms if they're too small, smaller condoms if they're too big and any other sort under the sun.
. . . but lets face it lads . . . condoms are crap.
Roll on the cure for all things bad and the day I can squirt in/across whoever wants it!
:twisted:
having lost a friend to hiv its a subject I feel very deeply about. I think peeps having unprotected sex are fooling themselves into believing "it'll never to me" its real and its here you are only one sexual encounter away from it.
Just to point out, some people may be thinking that circumcision may be of some protection against HIV.
This isn't the case whatsoever. Circumcision offers no protection against HIV and your risking yourself and others if you think it does.
Pardon?????????????????????
I never leave home without condoms in my handbag!