Northwestcouple
Either of them, to be honest.
Apologies to all if this seems pedantic, but it seems to me that, if you have something that you think is worthwhile posting, why not go to the trouble of at least trying to get some of it to make sense by punctuation or correct spelling. I've said before, we all make mistakes and yes, there are some people on the site who are dyslexic. However, the way that some people just don't try, makes their posts open to misinterpretation and very difficult to read.
Bev
xx
KitKat rote –
The gist of this seems to be that to be a ‘full swinger’ is a soft and general term used by many people to indicate 2 couples who meet to swap for penetrative sex between male and female
Define ‘soft swinging’
What ever anyone thinks of the above terminology's, we should all be free to express our views, and our own indivual idear's of swinging, with out any one taking offence to it
James that's exactly the point, we should be able to do that. It's just that someswingers are saying that some other swingers aren't proper swingers because they don't swap for penetrative sex.
Bev
Thought I'd better post my thoughts on this. With Punctuation.
Having only made my first post two days ago I was starting to find this thread rather troubling. My god! We haven't even been to a party/munch(I know what these are now) yet but We have made a concious decision to explore our sexuality. What does this make us, apprentice swingers, junior swingers, trainee swingers, office swinging gimps. I think what I have seen over the past few months (and the couple of days since I registered) is that the majority people on this site are respectfull, genuine, and sincerely caring. The reason this thread has grown so quickly is because, again, the majority of contributers have jumped in to defend what they believe in. I use the word 'majority' because, as with all walks of life you get people who are nasty, uncaring, cruel, selfish, violent etc,etc, and I suggest to you all that there is this element in all walks of life, from builders to lawyers, bin men to doctors, teachers to nurses. Everyone in this thread seems to agree with each other at some point. I hope when we do take the plunge into touching other people where they wee they are as sweet as you guys.
Make love. Not war
How was it for you Bev? (punctuality that is)
Well yes i must admit that sometimes my typing text and grammer is not quite correct and could cause people to misinterprit what has actually been stated. ( u can always tell the mrs post as her allot better than mine ) The only point i was trying to make was that we had not made the post with any malicious intent to any swingers ( soft full whatever ) we just placed a post statiing are they real full swingers in here ie we would like to meet cples were ther is a possiblility of us all swapping ( always a possibility as nothing is ever guarenteed we may not all get on ) and yes even to some pple full means the male partners swapping too whatever consenting adults do to or dont do with eachother is ther buisness noeone elses. The reference to us being named was ment to mean that on the thread where it origonaly started our real names were used and it was not us that deleted this thread from the site where it was posted the site is actually ne cples own site were they removed it therfor this debate couldent continue there. I feel it is however relavent to say that on 1 site our real names are used quite regularly but this is a site we have been managers of for quite some time and been members of for quite some time and know most pple there which acrtually ne cple is a manager themselves so maybe they just fergot what site they were on .One thing i have noted from this is yes nw cple ur right maybe in future posts we should put full swap not full swing as this is more appropriate i beleve for for the bag of full stops i seem to have used a few up here alredy could u please send me some more and show me how to use them. ( the mrs has tried several times to no sucsess )Anyhow i have to go get changed now and pick the mrs up seems we got an invite to the mini munch witch we are gratefull for and do hope to see some of u there take care and have fun. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Like I said.....The 'Majority'
Like ya style though.
Here's a thought.
What IF some people's definition of 'full swing' meant that, in a ffmm foursome, 'any hole's a goal'?
I am absolutely positive that there are bi couples on the site who will play within that boundary. Does that mean that everyone else is 'soft swing'? I bet plenty of people who class themselves as 'full swingers' would be leaping down from their perches.
Please, I mean no disrespect or offence to any bi person on the site, be they male, female, single or attached!
Bev
xx
i'm sure to offend someone i'm not up on who's who here yet, and i really aren't trying to apply this to anyone on this thread, it's just an observation based on many years in the game... but i've always found the people who scream the loudest about so called full swing penetrative sex, and moan the loudest about so called soft swing snogging and groping only are single fucking blokes with nothing to offer in return... apart from 30 seconds of frenzy. :twisted:
I think you might just find that there are many many lovely single men on here Lorri, who wouldn't complain about soft swingers. Let's face it, if you are offering what someone doesn't want, you move on. That's what the sensible ones do anyway, and they get the respect that they are due (and often more meets, I reckon). I agree with you though lol, it's mostly the 'sad' single men who complain loudest about 'soft swing'
Bev
xx
To be honest this topic has been done to death now on various levils. (soft hard full or half full lol )It seems some have understood in what context our origonal post was made this is all the point ither of us wanted to make.
- there was a tongue in that there cheek 
....which by many folks definition is a disinterest in the whole sexual build up and foreplay.
. 
thats quite ....infact...very....hot