i'm sure its just me, but has anyone else noticed that our beloved SH is changeing, and i dont mean in an evolveing for the better way either. Us "ordinary member's seem to be getting a poorer deal by the week. We are "all" suffering with poor chatroom connectivity,overzealous moderation, threads on the chatroom that the admin dont approve of "going missing" or "getting moved" or just plain locked down when the evidence of poor value for money or collusion are too much to refute, thus denying all members a "right to reply" But now us ordinary members are going to have to stuff up more cash to enjoy the, before now, standard benefits.
Mind you it would appear the parent company of SH wont cut you much slack if you ring to complain of the poor value for money or inadequate service, their standard patter is "we'll run our sites just how we want to" good luck SH, i for one wont be rejoining and will take my inconsequential cash elsewhere.
Im more than happy with SH. I would like to extend a big hearty thank you to all those who run it (for all the thanks they get) for operating an excellent site. The new chat rooms are great but even better is that the old ones are still there for those of us like me who fear change so we can get used to the change a bit more gradually.
Top marks SH! :thumbup:
You get out of it whatever you want to! I'll renew with gusto!
I go back and forth between the two. By the time the old ones gone I think I'll be perfectly used to the new one. Most sites would just switch and leave ppl to flounder. At least this way you can ease in gently. And seen that most ppl are on the new chat I would say its proving to be ok. Or no-one would be using it... right?
Ah, well in that case I not been in there long enough for that to happen to me. So far its been ok for me. Maybe Im just lucky then.
Well If you think SH is bad go and try some other sites for comparison before you start moaning. I find that this site has the best community spirit and the members are a better quality because of also allows even none paying members more features than other sites.
No chat engine is perfect and it all depends on load ( I did notice Lag last night in the new one ) but I can tell you as an IT guy they'll still be tweaking the back end to work better. The beta test only checked the functionality not the load.
Finally, yes you get out what you put in ! Make the effort to connect, have fun and make friends on the forum, in chat, and yes by message and ad's too.
I love this place :-D I cant believe I've been on 5 years or so already !
Vamp ! the lottery is mostly a waste of cash but that pound buys you the right to some damn good dreams lol
we think sh is a great site with loads of nice folks (alright we have met a couple of dickheads but they get everywhere)so sorry flylester but we cannot agree with you and we will definately be staying put here and while we are at it compared to other sites we have found sh is much better value for money
at least it will get sorted,,,
think this site runs better than our trains or buses...
when u update software it takes time to sort out little bits...
look at bill gates on windows... u paid £90 for some thing that never worked prperly n the public had to sort out all the snags...
bet this end up one of the best sites on the internet...
We joined around the same time as Tweekle and find ourslves tending to agree with all he has said I also happen to think that dividing the forums, though a good idea in principle, has diluted the forum and the forum users. Where the forum was integrated there was a greater diversity of topics and posters who now tend to stay either to the cafe or to the current affairs whereas under the same heading posters would venture into the topics and join in they now stay away from because they are, you could say 'in a different room'. As for the just for fun and welcome rooms ...... :giveup:
SH is still probably the best site for swingers on the net though it's ease of use, for me at least, is not so good as it was but then I'm pretty sh*te at using facebook or any of the other networking sites. In the end Lost like chatting and swinging and for us a simple(very) chat room a lively integrated forum and a fathomable search/meet today facility.
Not stirring things up at all Mal.....why the aggression here, and not the first time either??
I wrote how I saw it.
As a Moderator your aggression makes things even worse.
I was trying to help....YOU did not like it, then I apologise but I have not been aggressive by saying the things I did.
You were not trying to help at all. Your post was directly intent upon winding up Kaznkev. Being helpful would have been posting that it shows on a profile when someone is banned, not all the gubbins you posted.
As moderators, we don't like our name taken in vain. If you find that aggressive, that's only your perception which you are entitled to think, but it doesn't make it true.
Mal, this is a serious question and not intended to wind any one up, I'm just seeking clarification. A few weeks ago, I requested Mod intervention in a thread where a member was making totally irrational comments about me, only to be told that Mods could not now intervene ( due to the 3 strikes rule) unless a complaint had been received. Have the rules changed again since then?