Humour me, another Jung Typology test

15 Nov 2004

INTP
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
22 22 11 44

Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed introvert
slightly expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality
Not sure it's entirely correct for me, but some accurate points.
I'm the same type as Einstein!
lol

15 Nov 2004

Quote by Calista
Your Type is
INFJ
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
22 44 39 44
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed judging personality

I guess this is more me .....

Same type as me Calista!
LC biggrin

15 Nov 2004

I`m the same as Ice. Only in a 2% bracket, but unlike Mark and JonJon with thier 1%, this means I`m more likely to get laid :mrgreen:
Venusxxx

16 Nov 2004

Although we believe firmly that this model works very well to help in finding and maintaining healthy relationships, it is important to remember that it's just a tool. We offer guidelines to help you understand the kinds of things that you value in a relationship, rather than guidelines that you need to follow strictly. Two well-developed individuals of any type can make a relationship work. And work is a key concept here! There is no such thing as an effortless relationship. Don't use this model as an excuse to dump your relationship.

Sooooo, I`m now interested in couples. Mars hasn`t done his test yet, but I wouldn`t be at all surprised if he isn`t a natural match. We had to work hard to be this good together. With so many well-balanced couples here, I`m interested to see if the test is capable of highlighting those who didn`t have to work hard, or like myself and Mars, those who did.
Oh, and anybody who can remind me to eat and stuff whilst I`m looking into this would be much appreciated.....maybe I should shower and get dressed too?! lol

Venusxxx

16 Nov 2004

Quote by VenusnMars
maybe I should shower

I don't mind helping you with that if you like?
smile

2 Mar 2005

Actually Venus - it would be really interesting for someone to compile the results for anyone here that does this to see if we start to get any patterns of preferred behavioural styles of Swingers biggrin

The only issue is, you need a fair few results for it to have any validity.. how many members do we have? wink

I guess if we could validate it, we could then screen potential newbies and only lyet them on if they fit the bill - or let them on anyway and have fun with them... I'm JOKING :wink: (Kinda)

2 Mar 2005

I am INFJ, same as Reese. I really like what they say about me "abstract in thought and speech, cooperative in reaching their goals, and directive and introverted in their interpersonal roles. Counselors focus on human potentials, think in terms of ethical values, and come easily to decisions. The small number of this type (little more than 2 percent) is regrettable, since Counselors have an unusually strong desire to contribute to the welfare of others and genuinely enjoy helping their companions" which I believe is pretty accurate! It doesn't say, which would also be true, that I am a knowall that can't resist telling you when you're wrong about something I read a book abut 5 years ago!
WW

2 Mar 2005

Apparently my Type is
ENFP
Extroverted = 11
Intuitive = 25
Feeling = 25
Perceiving = 11
and apparently I am
* slightly expressed extrovert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed feeling personality
* slightly expressed perceiving personality
Which is funny because I never thought of myself as an extrovert...not even slightly
So, ENFP is that good or bad... am confused!

2 Mar 2005

There's no good or bad with any of this AWOL - it's just an indication of your preferred style. It doesn't mean that you can't behave in other ways - they are just not your first 'port of call'.
Pick up a pen and sign your name for me...... done that?
Good - now swop hands and sign again... could you do it? Yes? Of course you could... how did it feel? Uncomfortable? Awkward? Yes... but you could do it - behaviour is exactly the same biggrin

Now for the w**king test... wink

2 Mar 2005

Your Type is
ENFJ
Extroverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
1 50 38 56
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed extrovert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed judging personality

2 Mar 2005

Your Type is
INFP
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
11 50 62 22
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
distinctively expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality
One of the descriptions said : "Some INFPs have a gift for taking technical information and putting it into layman's terms.". Exactly what I do as part of my job! :shock:

2 Mar 2005

Your Type is
INFP
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
22 50 12 11
INFP type description by
INFP type description by J. Butt
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality
just as i thought - i'm a boring twat! lol

2 Mar 2005

Like buses - you wait for ages for one INFP - then three turn up at once! rolleyes

Your Type is INFP
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
67 25 38 89
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
 distinctively expressed introvert
 moderately expressed intuitive personality
 moderately expressed feeling personality
 very expressed perceiving personality
Apparently, I see the world through rose coloured glasses, always see the good in everyone, and I am constantly trying to create an ideal world. As If! wink

lhk
Kat

2 Mar 2005

You are:
* slightly expressed extrovert
* slightly expressed sensing personality
* moderately expressed feeling personality
* slightly expressed judging personality
dont understand what that means dunno

so if anyone can help then please do help me out :jagsatwork: innocent

2 Mar 2005

Of course anyone familiar with Myers Briggs or similar psychometric tests based on Jungâ€™s circle is having a field day reading this lot.
:shock:
I might even be able to get a doctorate from analysing this lol

2 Mar 2005

Quote by mollman
You are:
* slightly expressed extrovert
* slightly expressed sensing personality
* moderately expressed feeling personality
* slightly expressed judging personality
dont understand what that means so if anyone can help then please do help me out :jagsatwork:

If you go back to the page, you'll see a couple of links to some detailed descriptions of the ESFJ type and some examples of well known people whose personality type is similar to yours.
I remain skeptical, as is my nature, but I have to say I find this a lot less random, and more plausible, accurate, and worthy of study than some of the more mystical stuff being bandied around at the moment. smile

2 Mar 2005

Quote by Ice Pie
I remain skeptical

And so you should. Whilst Jung's Circle system is the second most widely used for psychometrics - the questioning methods often leave room for subconcious and concious manipulation. I much prefer the DISC system expecially when using isolated word selection rather than full sentence questioning.

2 Mar 2005

Thank you Polo, I`ve not heard of the DISC method before, and will look it up. I do tend to look at areas the test can fall down on as well as the insights it can offer, it`s fascinating on both accounts smile

Venusxxx

2 Mar 2005

Quote by VenusnMars
Thank you Polo, I`ve not heard of the DISC method before, and will look it up. I do tend to look at areas the test can fall down on as well as the insights it can offer, it`s fascinating on both accounts
Venusxxx

Thomas International is a leading system on DISC - I am licenced in that one if you ever want a full analysis doing.
They all work pretty much the same though - all break down to a base of four - similar to Jung.
Boring info - did you know psychometrics date back to 400 whatever BC and the time of Hippocrates. He noticed he could put his patients into 4 catagories and named them after body fluids.

2 Mar 2005

Quote by PoloLady
Boring info - did you know psychometrics date back to 400 whatever BC and the time of Hippocrates. He noticed he could put his patients into 4 catagories and named them after body fluids.

LOLOL I did :smug:
but then I did my Level A a few years go so I would hehehehehe
c x

2 Mar 2005

Quote by PoloLady
Thomas International is a leading system on DISC - I am licenced in that one if you ever want a full analysis doing.

I`d love one done, seriously.

Boring info - did you know psychometrics date back to 400 whatever BC and the time of Hippocrates. He noticed he could put his patients into 4 catagories and named them after body fluids.

That does ring a bell, something to do with humours and phlegms, and medical stuff was tweaked pending upon a personality and fluids therein...or summat or other! Something else for me to review!
The Venus monster is back on the prowl.....
Sorry Sarge! :lol2:
Venusxxx

2 Mar 2005

Quote by Calista
but then I did my Level A a few years go so I would hehehehehe

:kick:
Venusxxx

2 Mar 2005

DISC is the widest used system.
some adaptions use the disc and replace the letters with animals and colours.
D - lion - red
I - Dolphin - yellow
S - Labrador - gree
C - owl - blue
I am full of useless crap on psychometrics. lol

D - driver/dominant
I - Influencing
S - steadyness/supporting
C - compliant/analytical

2 Mar 2005

Quote by PoloLady
[the questioning methods often leave room for subconcious and concious manipulation.

Agreed. Questions that include words like "always" and "never" make it impossible to analyse properly: Does a No in answer to an always question mean never or does it mean sometimes? From the analyst's POV, there's no way to tell.

2 Mar 2005

Also, I find myself inclined to answer the questions by thinking up certain scenarios, and these scenarios will change depending upon my current situation. For example `do you prefer to be the center of attraction at parties`, well that would depend much upon the type of party I`m imagining at the time of answering the question. I tend to focus on Munches, because I feel I can be more myself in such environments, but is that kind of confidence valid if I`m not as confident elsewhere?
I`ve often wondered if the similar questions, and the way they are worded, which crop up later on in the questionaire are designed to compensate for this. I`m not sure.
Also, the questions on how intuitive a person is, will they be answering from what they have learnt to spot via experiance? If so, it`s not likely to be an indication of Intuitivism is it?
Marmalaid brought up a good point concerning the question `do you think everything in the world is relative`. I answered yes, because I beleive everything is relative to somethingelse, Mars but although Mars agreed with me, he answered no, because he read the question as `Is everything in the world relative to everything else`
Food for thought.
Venusxxx

2 Mar 2005

Your Type is
ESFP
Extroverted Sensing Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
89 1 38 44
ESFP type description by
ESFP type description by J. Butt
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
very expressed extrovert
slightly expressed sensing personality
moderately expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality
right can someone explain all that now lol dunno

2 Mar 2005

Your Type is
INFP
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
22 50 62 11
INFP type description by
INFP type description by J. Butt
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
distinctively expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality
Not sure if I agree wholly with the results, but they are fairly close to other 'tests' I have done which normally put me more as a extrovert!

2 Mar 2005

Quote by PoloLady
Of course anyone familiar with Myers Briggs or similar psychometric tests based on Jungâ€™s circle is having a field day reading this lot.
:shock:
I might even be able to get a doctorate from analysing this

Oh yes - wot a wonderful and free insight into people you've never met Polo Lady wink

I'm an ENTP = and you would be... ENTJ? :wink: