Hi to you all. Being relatively new to the scene we would like some advice from our - hopefully - soon to be peers.
What denotes a gang bang?
I am pretty confident that a threesome and foursome stand but do we have fivedoms and sixdoms or is it after four that we become a gangbang...
After gang bang It must be an orgy? - and at what number of people does gang bang end and orgy begin - is it twelve or fourteen and at what piont does it become a shagfest .. i imagine it to be anything over twenty four. (Correct me if im wrong)
Advice greatly apreciated as we would like to know what we are entering into before we agree to....
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Newbies needing Mathamatical Advice.
Sex God
does she wiggle her arse like that all the time???
Sorry what was the question?
:twisted: :P
Sorry what was the question?
:twisted: :P
Sex God
Does it matter what the group/activity is called as long as you're comfortable with the numbers/activities?
Orgasminator
Strangely enough, I remember an almost identical question at a party I went to a few years ago in Bristol. I can't remember what answer we came up with, but since the person who raised that point lives in the valleys I did have to do a double-take on your avatar to make sure I wasn't about to reply to my former housemate.
I have always considered to an orgy to be more of a roman thing where you have lots of sweaty bodies laid out on the floor gently writhing over each other in a sea of extacy
I have considered a gang bang to be more of an americanism where lots of men stand around wanking whilst waiting to pork two girls up all 3 orafaces at once. Less sensual more animalistic.
I would think that anything over a foursome would probably be an orgy/gangbang simply because after 4 you run out of sensible words to use. Whether its an orgy or gangbang is personal preference in vocabulary. No point in getting hung up on different words for the same thing, when you can call a spade a shovel.
I think that the best newbie maths advice for men is that 8 inches really is as long as your arm, and shorter than your cock :twisted:
I have considered a gang bang to be more of an americanism where lots of men stand around wanking whilst waiting to pork two girls up all 3 orafaces at once. Less sensual more animalistic.
I would think that anything over a foursome would probably be an orgy/gangbang simply because after 4 you run out of sensible words to use. Whether its an orgy or gangbang is personal preference in vocabulary. No point in getting hung up on different words for the same thing, when you can call a spade a shovel.
I think that the best newbie maths advice for men is that 8 inches really is as long as your arm, and shorter than your cock :twisted:
Sex God
Surely a gangbang consists of a number of men having sex with one woman, whereas an orgy is just general group sexual activity with any number of people. Who on earth could lay (ahem!) down rules defining numbers!
Mike.
Mike.
Quote by MikeNorth
Surely a gangbang consists of a number of men having sex with one woman, whereas an orgy is just general group sexual activity with any number of people. Who on earth could lay (ahem!) down rules defining numbers!
Mike.
I was just about to say the exact same thing.
wales_cple
hwoar: :phwoar: :phwoar: I could sit and watch that avatar pic all day.................... in fact I think I will. *settles down with a cup of tea and some biscuits* These days depends what nationality you are, it seems to me.
On American pornsites, a "gangbang" is what I'd call an orgy.
So far as I've ever understood it, 2 blokes + 1 girl is a 3some or MMF and anything more than 2 blokes+1 girl is a GB.
Anything over about 8 blokes is a "Tamworth".
On American pornsites, a "gangbang" is what I'd call an orgy.
So far as I've ever understood it, 2 blokes + 1 girl is a 3some or MMF and anything more than 2 blokes+1 girl is a GB.
Anything over about 8 blokes is a "Tamworth".
Sex God
Quote by Kniphofia
Anything over about 8 blokes is a "Tamworth".
Why a "Tamworth"? That's a breed of pig as well as being a place in Staffordshire.
:confused: :confused: :confused:
Quote by postie
It's easy !
Erm I think this is what Postie means >>>>>>
342 - 173 = 169 or is it 342 - 173 = 147.
You can't take three from two,
Two is less than three,
So you look at the four in the tens place,
Now that's really four tens,
So you make it three tens,
Regroup, and you change a ten to ten ones,
And add them to the two and you get twelve,
And you take away three, thats nine,
Is that clear ?.
Now instead of four in the tens place,
You've got three,
'Cause you added one,
That is to say, ten, to the two,
But you can't take seven from three,
So you look in the hundreds place.
****************************************
sod it, I lost the plot :lol
Fred (never was good at "pure math"
ps :- both answers are correct by the way
Sex God
Quote by Kniphofia
You, er..... had to be there.
Ooooooooooooh! :P
Right I'm making a mental note to put Tamworth on my list of must visit areas.
:lol: Is there a layby anywhere in that neck of the woods that might suit my criteria for adoption?
:rascal: :rascal:
Orgasminator
Quote by EnglishChris99
No point in getting hung up on different words for the same thing, when you can call a spade a shovel.
I think there's probably a fair number of gardeners and builders on here who'd beg to differ on that point (at least they would if they're as much of a pedant as me
). Whilst the two tools are superficially similar, they're designed to do very different jobs, as you'd quickly realise if you tried to dig the garden with a shovel or move sand around with a spade. Sex God
Quote by bhd1976
No point in getting hung up on different words for the same thing, when you can call a spade a shovel.
I think there's probably a fair number of gardeners and builders on here who'd beg to differ on that point (at least they would if they're as much of a pedant as me
). Whilst the two tools are superficially similar, they're designed to do very different jobs, as you'd quickly realise if you tried to dig the garden with a shovel or move sand around with a spade.That is sooooooooo true! :lol: :lol:
Quote by EagerSlut
No point in getting hung up on different words for the same thing, when you can call a spade a shovel.
I think there's probably a fair number of gardeners and builders on here who'd beg to differ on that point (at least they would if they're as much of a pedant as me
). Whilst the two tools are superficially similar, they're designed to do very different jobs, as you'd quickly realise if you tried to dig the garden with a shovel or move sand around with a spade.That is sooooooooo true! :lol: :lol:
But it will be more fun if I use a HOE !!!
I too am a pedant, hence the discourse on gangbangs and orgys... and I tend to find spades work for most things... although if I ever need to bury a dead body in sand real quick I will remember to pack a shovel :twisted:
Quote by wales_cple
Ooh so typically BRITISH of you all to defer from the subject...
Well I for one did provide an on subject answer... unfortunately this bunch of perverts were more interested in my spade than the careful description of gangbangs and orgies :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
Wales_cple, any time you want me to come and do a Noris Mcwerter impersination at your next gangbang to independantly verify it an orgy let me know and I will bring my shovel to remove all the puddles of spunk. :P :P
Sex God
Quote by Robert1961
that sould have been expected how many threads on here do end on teh same subject as they started
i would say
threesome
gangbang
then orgy
and after that who cares have fun
My point, I think?
Sex God
Quote by wales_cple
Ooh so typically BRITISH of you all to defer from the subject...
SH is a UK site anyway. The term you're looking for is a 'hijack' of a thread. Happens a lot.
Orgasminator
Quote by wales_cple
Ooh so typically BRITISH of you all to defer from the subject...
Well I did provide an answer in my first post in this thread, albeit of the don't know variety.
I'd tend to go with the people saying that it doesn't really matter what you call it as long as you're having fun, though I'd also find it hard to disagree with the comment about a gang bang involving one or two women as the centre of attention and a lot of blokes*, while an orgy would involve a more flexible mix of participants and activities.
*or indeed one or two blokes and a lot of other blokes, if that's your thing.
At the end of the day, you could just call it group sex and get on with doing it rather than discussing what to call it.
Hijacked my foot - I am taking note.
English Chris has made about the most sense but he missed the most vital point - Wine - Roman orgies have always been depicted as glistening toga draped bodies being fed grapes & wine whilst parallelagramally slithering and intermingeling over each others bodies. The more wealthy of the sect bathed in asses milk with six to nine slaves washing, drying, dressing them & waiting on them hand and foot. These wealthy Romans have always been depicted as beautiful (Cleopatra) but this i belive to be untrue. One needs to use the human body to keep it fit and active and if everything is fetched and carried and not a finger lifted then the muscles weaken, feign & loose their oomph.
English Chris has made about the most sense but he missed the most vital point - Wine - Roman orgies have always been depicted as glistening toga draped bodies being fed grapes & wine whilst parallelagramally slithering and intermingeling over each others bodies. The more wealthy of the sect bathed in asses milk with six to nine slaves washing, drying, dressing them & waiting on them hand and foot. These wealthy Romans have always been depicted as beautiful (Cleopatra) but this i belive to be untrue. One needs to use the human body to keep it fit and active and if everything is fetched and carried and not a finger lifted then the muscles weaken, feign & loose their oomph.
Quote by wales_cple
Hijacked my foot - I am taking note.
English Chris has made about the most sense but he missed the most vital point - Wine - Roman orgies have always been depicted as glistening toga draped bodies being fed grapes & wine whilst parallelagramally slithering and intermingeling over each others bodies. The more wealthy of the sect bathed in asses milk with six to nine slaves washing, drying, dressing them & waiting on them hand and foot. These wealthy Romans have always been depicted as beautiful (Cleopatra) but this i belive to be untrue. One needs to use the human body to keep it fit and active and if everything is fetched and carried and not a finger lifted then the muscles weaken, feign & loose their oomph.
Why thankyou... its rare I make any sense :shock:
When it comes to the Romans our image of them is very much based on Charlton Heaston movies. Where they wore drapes to cover up what could not be shown in the mass market cinema.
You have a point about them possibly not being too fit, but then beuty is often a product of the times... back then a flabby fat bloke was probably quite sexy, because he was rich and powerful enough to be able to build the fat rather than loose it.
The romans were well known for their strange sexual practices, homosexuality was very common, and they were probably a lot more comfortable as a society with their sexual behaviour. Although it was not without social conventions.
If you two ever want a visit to Bath I can show you the etchings (*giggle*) in the roman baths which illustrate how bloody randy they were. As usual to get the real skinny on history you have to dump some of whatever you learned at highschool.
Incidentally your description of a Roman Orgy sounds much more enjoyable than my description !!! :P :P :P :twisted:
Sex God
off to get grapes from supermarket,
