How important is it allowed to be here? Because I`m beginning to feel like a traitor to the cause! When I think about swinging with someone, it takes a combination of things to spark my sexual interest, and this willinclude physical attraction. I just thank god that my taste is not fully centered around the `Western Ideal`, or I`d be screwed....or not as the case may be!
Looks are unimportant to me when making friends however, and I have some fantastic friends here who I`d love to shag.....except that thier physical makeup doesn`t float my boat at all, and I can`t get past that. Then I end up feeling like a heel.
Am I the only one?
Venusxxx
We feel exactly the same Venus.........
Dont care whar someone looks like if we are gonna make friends but to shag someone there HAS to be a physical attraction as well as being able to get along socially..
Sorry if that makes us shallow but thats how it is...
Nope! I'm "shallow" enough for it to matter - I have no special body image that must be met, but no spark, no play. Just the way I am....
not the only one by far.
well ok...... as in i feel the same too lol.
the thought of playing with someone who did not hold any attraction for me in a physical sence makes me shudder, i just could not have sex with somene under those conditions...regardless of how much i liked them as a person.
then again i DO have to like them mentally too, i guess where as some people can settle for one or the other - i have to have both.
yeah i know... greedy as usual!
I`m much the same Rainbows.
Personality is something I won`t compromise on (ignoring the `stranger sex` stuff I`ve not explored nor want to get into here), but I do find that if a person`s personality clicks strongly with me, they begin to look more attractive as time goes on! I`ll start appreciating physical attributes I hadn`t previously noticed, but that does have it`s limits.
I think when it involves lovehowever, then that limit is non-existant.
Venusxxx
For me men fall into the following cataories
1) The Fancy Them like Hell catagory. This group of men can have straw for brains as long as they have long hair, preerably tied in a poony tail
2) The Ones With Brains This catagory can look llike the back end of a bus, it dostn matter but it is a nice extra if they are a bit fanciable!! If the worst comes to the worst i can alwys close my eyes, in fact thinking about it i often do close my eyes!!!
Of course the whole of the male population dosnt fall into the above catagories there are also
catageories 3 and 4
3) Are men who are far, far too nice to shag, the type that become friends and nothing more
4) The totally ulck type, no bains and no llooks and absolutely no chance!!!
I agree with the general consensus, definately a mixture of personality and looks for me, but not in any order. I have found myself very attracted to people I haven't found particularly physically attractive and vice versa.
hmm, looks like I buck the trend here
for me, yes there usually is some physical attraction, but being the wierd bugger I am, evev if they are emminently shaggable, if the personality isnt a match...
I could always use the paper bag to hide a face, but you cant ignore a personality.
Personality always comes first with me, I truly believe the old saying "beauty is in the eye of the beholder". Maybe thats because I am a ugly git, but I like to think its because I dont like playing games with people and with me, well, what you see is what you get
Surely it works both ways? For me, physical attraction is important, sure. Tthere are people I could not imagine doing it with under any circumstances. But equally, I can't do it with someone I don't like! Doesn't matter how drop dead gorgeous they are, they are a nasty person nothing can make up for that. And the more I like them the less important (but never unimportant) the physical side is.
As for feeling guilty: you are who you are! We can make marginal improvements but we can't change our basics and that's that. So don't feel guilty if you neither like or fancy me - I don't mind, and your taste is your own affair. But if you do either, then great and I'll buy the first round of drinks.
Just don't do what someone did once - met me after many years in a pub and told me she had the ranging hots for me BACK THEN! Not now, of course!
WW
I'm kind of with MQ.
I sometimes see some one and I think Wow she raises my interest and that is often enough but if there is something in the personality that I dislike then no amount of mutual interest will get me there.
and then I now people who I'm not attracted to physically but as i get to now them a Spark in there Eyes just does it for me and I wan't to jump them in the nicest possible way lol.
The one advantage of personality is you don't work up with the thought "just what was I thinking"
If it's just looks that is shallow. I think most people's feeling about what makes someone shaggable is often attributed to looks but in fact it goes wider than that. I bet most people have said to themselves at sometime - 'I dunno what it is, but he/she plucks my string' well I think that can be for a number of reasons ranging from someone with a lot of power or fame to bit of an ugly bugger but he's got sexy earlobes.
I'm not interested in playing with some one I don't find attractive. However people I find attractive don't generally fit the predictable ideals of good lookingness. I am attracted to people because they have a special way of looking at me, or something special, unusual. My dilemma is, I am often not attracted to people who peobably feel they are attractive (as I feel attractive but certianly don't expect people to be attracted to me). So what do you say? How can you really say you're not into it without causing offence?