well to get nipples to stand erect (neccessity, not for the piercers sexual benefit!) the nipple needs to b wiped with an alcohol wipe (which are damn cold, trust me lol!) to prepare the area for piercing. u then mark up where u r gonna pierce.
As for clit piercing. it is normaly the hood that is pierced and not the clit itself. most womens clits arnt big enough to pierce and if u did pierce the actual clit it would remove a 'tunnel' of nerves, which defeats the object of piercing it in the first place!
a clit wouldnt need to b stimulated to pierce it anyway, all that excess blood would have to go somewhere........
the same 4 gents, if u want ur john done he dosent need to b erect to pierce him!!.......the amount of times i've come face-to-penis with an erect member cos the guy had his wires crossed :shock: lolol
sorry if i got destracted from the original topic!! xx :P
I don't think the option of having one done and not the other really can count as covering both options. Your pierced or your not. Ok ok maybe it does from your point of view but as you can see from the poll people have mixed opinions. To them it's one or the other, pierced or not...
I suppose the upshot of my comment is are you bothered what other people think?
We are both agreed neither of us are into nipple or clit piercing. I know it is more acceptable nowadays but still has that 'Fetish' stigma to us.
Sorry but just our honest opinion.
I have been toying with the idea of getting my nips done for a long time and even went in and had them marked up. All I kept hearing was CCR and Dawn saying "Wilma, it really hurts, I felt faint etc etc" so I bottled it. I had my labia pierced many many years ago and it was not a nice experience. But hey ho it's done now and looks quite pretty, well I think so anyway.
Go for it Heather, your braver than me!!!
Love
Wilma
x x x x
go for it. i had one done a few years back and it is such a different feeling from the non pierced, the best of both worlds :P