Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Today a man shot in London and another tube station closed

last reply
144 replies
5.9k views
3 watchers
0 likes
Quote by duncanlondon
I have read some of the latest reports.
It appears that the guy was overpowered by several acting oficers and then shot.
This is not so good. If the guy was innocent then its a mess.
If the guy was a terrorist, it would have been essential to keep him alive for questioning.

It appears that he was unarmed from latest reports. Sometimes people are killed so they don't talk.
Quote by duncanlondon
I have read some of the latest reports.
It appears that the guy was overpowered by several acting oficers and then shot.
This is not so good. If the guy was innocent then its a mess.
If the guy was a terrorist, it would have been essential to keep him alive for questioning.

With whats been going on would you have said Hands Up
no he would have got both barrels from my first choice jungle weapon.
Quote by seagull69
I have read some of the latest reports.
It appears that the guy was overpowered by several acting oficers and then shot.
This is not so good. If the guy was innocent then its a mess.
If the guy was a terrorist, it would have been essential to keep him alive for questioning.

It appears that he was unarmed from latest reports. Sometimes people are killed so they don't talk.
so your saying he was silenced then.......what a crock!!
I have been reading some of your posts and i think you are way off mark and sympathic to these people.....
The police are damned if they do and damned if they don't......what if that police officer had not fired giving that man a chance to press a button and explode a bomb killing people......i suppose you would be on here moaning about the police not doing anything about stopping the guy??....
Quote by Sexysteph
I really feel for the Officer - He will be the one having to face the interogations by colleagues for all the fecking Do-Gooders God they make my blood boil mad .

My sentiments hun = you beat me to it.
The police officer done the correct thing and my thoughts go with him in the trying time he will have later, and to his family who will suffer his anguish.
Fred
Quote by da69ve
I have read some of the latest reports.
It appears that the guy was overpowered by several acting oficers and then shot.
This is not so good. If the guy was innocent then its a mess.
If the guy was a terrorist, it would have been essential to keep him alive for questioning.

It appears that he was unarmed from latest reports. Sometimes people are killed so they don't talk.
so your saying he was silenced then.......what a crock!!
I wasn't actually talking about this event as I haven't a clue what is going on but it is not unknown for individuals to be taken out in situations where they could have been taken alive. The Iranian embassy siege was one of them.
Quote by Sexysteph
and some reports say he was reaching inside his top maybe to make a connection to explode a device??? Better safe than very sorry --- remember 56 dead how many maimed?
Lets not forget he was one of the terrorists involved in Yesturdays events and potentially connected to the events of 2 weeks back
If he was innocent he should have stopped still when challenged by over 20 officers who warned him. Sorry but I still say the officer did what he had to do. Well done that Man.
I feel we should STOP second guessing the security people - we have entrusted our safety to them - let them do it for Gods Sake.
This man's death was his own fault. Had he obeyed directions he most likely would be alive tonight.

the police say they are still looking for 4 people connceted from yesterdays attacks... so it is unlikely he was terrorists...
HOWEVER.... if he was innocent and he refused to stop after he was asked to by the police on several occasions then starts running wouldn't you at some point give yourself up????
I do believe that one innocent death is one too many......... Just like there were 52 innocent deaths on 7/7...
Quote by da69ve
so your saying he was silenced then.......what a crock!!
I have been reading some of your posts and i think you are way off mark and sympathic to these people.....
The police are damned if they do and damned if they don't......what if that police officer had not fired giving that man a chance to press a button and explode a bomb killing people......i suppose you would be on here moaning about the police not doing anything about stopping the guy??....

I think you are way off the mark saying I am sympathetic too these people. I have not condemened the police on here at all. I didn't condemn them after the first bomb and I don't think that I have condemened them now. rolleyes
Quote by fabio grooverider
and some reports say he was reaching inside his top maybe to make a connection to explode a device??? Better safe than very sorry --- remember 56 dead how many maimed?
Lets not forget he was one of the terrorists involved in Yesturdays events and potentially connected to the events of 2 weeks back
If he was innocent he should have stopped still when challenged by over 20 officers who warned him. Sorry but I still say the officer did what he had to do. Well done that Man.
I feel we should STOP second guessing the security people - we have entrusted our safety to them - let them do it for Gods Sake.
This man's death was his own fault. Had he obeyed directions he most likely would be alive tonight.

the police say they are still looking for 4 people connceted from yesterdays attacks... so it is unlikely he was terrorists...
HOWEVER.... if he was innocent and he refused to stop after he was asked to by the police on several occasions then starts running wouldn't you at some point give yourself up????
I do believe that one innocent death is one too many......... Just like there were 52 innocent deaths on 7/7...
54 at the last count and only 50 of them innocent
Just to help make things clear, the latest Police reports are that he was a suspect they had been following who was challenged and ran. Whether or not he was armed, he certainly wasn't an innocent victim and the decision to take him down if he was believed to pose a threat would probably have been taken long before he ran from them.
There are unconfirmed reports that he was the Oval bomb suspect, though the description I heard sounds more like the bloke from the Number 26 bus. The police have released CCTV stills of the four suspects, htey're available on the BBC website.
Quote by seagull69
I wasn't actually talking about this event as I haven't a clue what is going on.

I do not believe you made a comment like that without reading the whole thread. mad
fred
Quote by Fred aka Medic 1

I wasn't actually talking about this event as I haven't a clue what is going on.

I do not believe you made a comment like that without reading the whole thread. mad
fred
Try reading my whole comment. rolleyes
Quote by seagull69

I wasn't actually talking about this event as I haven't a clue what is going on.

I do not believe you made a comment like that without reading the whole thread. mad
fred
Try reading my whole comment. rolleyes
I DID :roll:
enough said
Quote by seagull69
So its Ok for you to accuse me of being sympathetic to terrorism by saying that I don't condemn it and when I accuse you of being selective of the terrorist you support of which I mean the Briish state you get all abusive.

This is something you said earlier......you are no big fan of out Government either,to be honest whose side are you on.....
He was approached on the London Underground, apparently concealing an object, then legged it, was given orders to stop, didn't, and quite deservedly got shot in the head 5 times.
If they tried a body shot, he could have easily still set the device off if it did exist.
The fact he isn't connected to any bombing activity isn't relevant - its his own stupid fault for not stopping.
To quote Saskia, "end of".
Quote by da69ve
So its Ok for you to accuse me of being sympathetic to terrorism by saying that I don't condemn it and when I accuse you of being selective of the terrorist you support of which I mean the Briish state you get all abusive.

This is something you said earlier......you are no big fan of out Government either,to be honest whose side are you on.....
I am on the side of the ordinary guy in the street of whatever race or creed. I belong to no country,no race,no religion.....Peace and Love
My worry now is "Where Next".
With London full of police (plain clothes or uniformed) drafted in from other areas, and, has been mentioned, the special services, will other city's seem like softer targets to these muderous scum. confused:
The possibility is there, make no mistake people.
Fred
Quote by seagull69
I belong to no country,no race,no religion.....Peace and Love

Then, how lucky are you?
Lucky that there are people that do !
:gagged:
Quote by dambuster

I belong to no country,no race,no religion.....Peace and Love

Then, how lucky are you?
Lucky that there are people that do !
:gagged:
Sounds more like a cop out Dambuster!
Quote by da69ve

I belong to no country,no race,no religion.....Peace and Love

Then, how lucky are you?
Lucky that there are people that do !
:gagged:
Sounds more like a cop out Dambuster!
i wish i could have the same attitude as seagull..... but i happen to be an american born british person, who happens to be black......
trust me seagull i have been "stopped and searched" more times than you could possibly imagine... and as much as i resent it at the best of times, i just hold my mouth and put up with it.... i know i have done nothing wrong and i know the police have a job to do.....
sean
Quote by da69ve
Sounds more like a cop out Dambuster!

Not a cop out, Dave - Ill-informed, opinionated, ignorant (in bliss) comfortable, secure by the grace of others ???? dunno
I'm going to do my best to leave this thread, but before I do:
(Ready with your buttons, Bilko?)
Who shot cock robin? The police or the boys - today is irrelevant. Please - stop trying to second guess the security services. It will do you no good.
I long for days past when we didn't have the same instant news, and indeed openness of reporting that we know have. What's next? "embedding" of journos during peace time in home theatre ffs ? ! ? !
"Shoot to kill" is not a conspiracy - it's about hitting the target in order to bring about a fast, effective solution while minimising danger to normals.
To seagull, and any yoghurt knitting, cardigan wearing liberals. Be thankful there are people with different attitudes and beliefs to yours, just as they are to you.
Hi Guys
No it is not a cop out at all. I think its harder to stand up for peace and to turn the other cheek.
In my past I belonged to organisations that saw violence as a solution to the worlds problems. I realised that as I keep saying that violence just breeds more violence.
If it makes you feel better Fabio so have I, loads of times, and I am white I just seem to catch the Police's eye. This is rapidly (and nothing to do with your post mate) becoming a 'race' issue which is what Al quida want. In my office people who I never thought of as anyone other than collegues start saying I am muslim and asian so I am being targeted... They feel we are all out to 'get' them and unsafe to walk down the street.
This man was shot for one reason, they thought he was carrying a bomb! Not because he was asian, but his behaviour, his cloaths and the thing he was hiding... He could have been white (I understand we are allowed to be Muslim as well), Asian, Black, Chinese, or any mix in between and the result would be the same. To say otherwise is madness.
If this was the US then this could be any copper making this call. In the UK few carry guns and they are very highly trained, they are not assisns, they do not do this for fun. If the Police killed this man they did so to save their lives and those around them. They now face a long investigation, in this country we do care when a life is lost. People do not 'dissapear' here, the Police are not murderers or terrorists and the last thing they want is to upset a community, any one.
Finally in this mini rant (for which I apologise in advance) I hear on the radio that we are the terrorists for killing a wedding party in Iraq, so this justified us being bombed... Bollocks... The difference is Terrorists kidnap an innocent man, torture him over days, torture his family watching him, and murder him. We make mistakes in war, we apologise to victims and prosocute and punish those who made the mistakes. We TRY not to hurt the innocent, the terrorists TRYTO HURT THEM!
I can't understand why people cannot see the difference. We are ashamed where innocents are hurt or killed, terrorists are proud.
Quote by dambuster

Sounds more like a cop out Dambuster!

Not a cop out, Dave - Ill-informed, opinionated, ignorant (in bliss) comfortable, secure by the grace of others ???? dunno
I'm going to do my best to leave this thread, but before I do:
(Ready with your buttons, Bilko?)
Who shot cock robin? The police or the boys - today is irrelevant. Please - stop trying to second guess the security services. It will do you no good.
I long for days past when we didn't have the same instant news, and indeed openness of reporting that we know have. What's next? "embedding" of journos during peace time in home theatre ffs ? ! ? !
"Shoot to kill" is not a conspiracy - it's about hitting the target in order to bring about a fast, effective solution while minimising danger to normals.
To seagull, and any yoghurt knitting, cardigan wearing liberals. Be thankful there are people with different attitudes and beliefs to yours, just as they are to you.
:dunno: lol :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Best laugh I have had all day mate
I know all about dark humour, I have worked long enough with the emergency services. But seagul mate I don't think making light of people in this thread is a good plan...
As for turning the other cheek you have the right to turn yours, these Police were trying to save everyone elses...
Seagull you seemed to have got the back up of some well established members,their opinions i regard much higher than before you say "I'm allowed an opinion", i think you are just baiting here!
I wave :wave:
Not waving, watching.
rolleyes
Quote by Jags
I wave :wave:
Not waving, watching.
rolleyes

I just hope your eyesight is A1 wink
okay... so we are now 36hrs later from the last post on this thread.....
and we now know that instead of this guy being of a potential suicide bomber, he was an innocent 27yr old brazilian national who had been in no trouble here and living legally for the last 3 yrs...
and where the police said that at the time it was "a part of the ongoing enquiry into the attacks"....... now are saying that "it was in no way connected to the investigation"
what do we make of it all..... why did the police "mislead" the general public??? how could they get the surveylance so wrong that it lead to this???
i just wondered if your views had changed in light of what we were all originally told....
my deepest sympathy goes to all of the families involved... the one who was shot and the police who fired the bullets.......
sean xxxxxxxxx
If he was wearing a coat, acting suspiciously, and ran from the police, he was a potential threat and had to be stopped.
Head shot was the only option.
Put yourself on that train for a sec. A man charges onto the train, 3 men after him, and theres been 2 terror attacks in a week - u'd like the guy shot as quickly as possible too!
Quote by 3someinpreston
.. and ran from the police... Put yourself on that train for a sec....!

OK but now put yourself in another position. You are a young white man, having lived only three years in the dangerous capital city of a country where the residents are dark-skinned and paranoia is at an all time high due to a recent spate of attacks by young white men. Suddenly you are being chased by a number of heavily-armed police. (They were big guns apparently.) Tell me you wouldn't run.
Jezzay.