Did anyone watch the Top 100 albums of all time????We watched it till it got half way then set the video to record the just discovered that it didnt bloody record.
Can anyone tell me who was in the top ten or even better give a link to the top 100 because i can't find it anywhere.
I can't remember the top ten but i know that Radiohead got the number 1 spot with "OK, Computer"
Honestly, I've never heard such rubbish
I'll see if i can find a link for you though
Hmmm bit cheeky calling Radiohead rubbish, but I was surprised they came out on top over Beatles and Nirvana.
I nearly shit a brick when Radiohead came in first ! I can only imagine that next year it will be an album of Gregorian chants , which is the only thing similar to the dirge !
and as fer feckin Patty Smith FFS , thank goodness Bob the Builder never released an album or he would probably have come just above Curtis Mayfield .
Radiohead ! ? Im sure it was listening to that album all the way through that led Kurt to finally top himself.
Possibly the longest post i've ever seen!
I don't like Radiohead. I think it's made for depressive teenagers. I'll take my hippity hop or proper rock any day of the week.
Like Oasis, and Jimi Hendrix. Now they're brilliant. I'm having a bit of trouble seeing how Definitely Maybe beat What's The Story (Morning Glory) in the list though. They're both great albums but surely Whats The Story...... is better? No?
He made a good album first Calista , thats the main thing :-)
Some of it's good i'll give you that.
I think The Bends was the better album though
Thats the only problem i have with Radiohead. They get you down.
But i suppose all great musicians are manic depressives. Wasn't Pink Floyd songwriter Roger Walters one too? i may be wrong
Well I have 22 of the 100 so I guess this makes me vaguely cred. Only one Smiths album on the list, which was very disappointing, although The Queen is Dead is easily their best. As for Dido's inclusion - don't get me started! And where were the Manics????
Still, I'd love to know who actually votes for these lists - no one's ever asked me......
Steve - I agree that New Order are one of the most important bands of the last 20-odd years, but I'm not sure they ever made a seminal, great album. Maybe Low Life, I guess, and certainly compared with bloody Dido I'd put it in. And Joy Division were there.....
New Order fans probably spread their votes too thinly. Moby has had as many albums out, but no-one is going to argue that he's done anything as strong as "Play", so all the votes went one way there. Then again, New Order were always a singles band, and none of their albums were strong all the way through.
Depeche Mode didn't even get into the shortlist of 125, despite an organised effort by their fanbase to stuff the ballot box - something they were outstandingly good at in the past, forcing the BPI to award 'Enjoy the Silence' single of the year when it only got to no.3 in the charts - funnily enough that was the only year the general public got to vote :-)
Joni was there!!
:happy: :happy: :happy: :happy: :happy:
Cathy x
I had this discussion with my brother yesterday i cannot belive that
OK COMPUTER got number 1
i can think of a number of albums that are betetr tan that pile of poop
1) Fat of Land Prodigy
2) Revolver - Beatles
3) Oasis - Morning Glory
4) Urban Hymes - Verve
my brother admitidley had queen and bowie at the top.
which twats voted this.
Mike
Personally I find these polls/surveys a waste of time as people just end up arguing about thier own favourite I like something I buy it regardless of polls/surveys.
I have to bow to the massive support they have , and even im not conceited enough to stand up and think I know better than such a ground swell of opinion as that which is behind Radiohead . Ive nothing against sad songs , and lyrics are the most important thing for me in a track .
That said I wont talk like an great authority because im not , but I will say I just dont get it ! I really dont get the status afforded to Radiohead by their followers . Contrary to suggestions I HAVE listened to the lyrics ( though it was quite tough at times as the actual backing tracks dont help with that ) and they are good words , but by no means the cleverest most insightful or most profound ive heard - even amongst very similar bands . I dont accept the comparisons made with some of the bands that changed the face of music forever at all , in fact musically in terms of structure or form they bring nothing at all that I see as ground breaking or even original . I will let them have the fact that their videos are often quite good .
I suppose what im saying is they strike me as almost pretentious , in the way that its all such hard work . Its like the amazing quality of their music is some 'great secret' that only those who 'understand' would appreciate . I dont think music should be that way , and its just my personal preference but i think sometimes when it comes to songs using complex lyrics with hidden meanings where a simple line with a good melody could have been is less entertaining . If i were to try and define a good song , id start with entertaining , then touching , then emotional then very last thought provoking . If i wanted challenging first then id write a musical score for Proust . All i mean is music pop music should make you walk away first feeling better for having heard it , and if it provokes thought as well then thats a cool bonus.
Anyway like i said perhaps i just dont get it .
Theyre not to my taste and thats fine , are they a good band ? Well im sure they are and certainly far more talented than me . Did they make the best album ever ? I cant accept that no .