Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

twins/sisters, mother/daughter etc

last reply
103 replies
5.6k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Never had a sister and certainly didn't/dont harbour any desires about my mother but I do rather like my Aunty redface
I know it would never happen(and as we're related so it shouldn't) but she is a very attractive lady who if she wasn't a relative of mine would certainly be on my wish list :lol2:
Twincest is hot. Pretty much because its wrong.
Filth is hot.
, like most illegal sexual activities, is just wrong on so many levels :shock:
Quote by Sassy-Seren
, like most illegal sexual activities, is just wrong on so many levels :shock:

well... if you think about it...how many "other" people would have brought up the subject in here.....
I rest my case......
Quote by brucie
to be honest your auntie was disappointing. too much teeth springs to mind.

Dont flatter yourself....
it is something that I just don't get at all.
I met a woman in a swingers club in Holland who went to clubs with her brother. They didn't have sex together but they often 'looked out' for each other. She said that she knew that her brother would make sure that she was never hurt or treated badly and he was the best person to do that. Likewise she could do that same for him.
I understand the logic to a point... but still struggle to get my head around it. She said that as they were both adults there was nothing wrong with it... and she even spoke of friends of hers (sisters) who regularly went swinging together and had sex with the same man or woman at the same time. They had no sexual contact with each other. This is also 'wrong' to me. After thinking of it for a while I wondered if it is a parallel to those hetty couples where the woman has DP with her male partner and a male swinging partner and both men declare they are straight?... it has And isn't abuse when one person isn't consenting ?
oh, I don't know. It doesn't work for me. I have no attraction to anyone that I am related to. Although I can see that they may be attractive. But then again what would happen if I found out that Worlass were related ? I certiainly aint giving her up. She earns too much and she is good in bed.
Quote by splendid_
it is something that I just don't get at all.
I met a woman in a swingers club in Holland who went to clubs with her brother. They didn't have sex together but they often 'looked out' for each other. She said that she knew that her brother would make sure that she was never hurt or treated badly and he was the best person to do that. Likewise she could do that same for him.
I understand the logic to a point... but still struggle to get my head around it. She said that as they were both adults there was nothing wrong with it... and she even spoke of friends of hers (sisters) who regularly went swinging together and had sex with the same man or woman at the same time. They had no sexual contact with each other. This is also 'wrong' to me. After thinking of it for a while I wondered if it is a parallel to those hetty couples where the woman has DP with her male partner and a male swinging partner and both men declare they are straight?... it has And isn't abuse when one person isn't consenting ?
oh, I don't know. It doesn't work for me. I have no attraction to anyone that I am related to. Although I can see that they may be attractive. But then again what would happen if I found out that Worlass were related ? I certiainly aint giving her up. She earns too much and she is good in bed.

I once read in a chav mag about a mother and son who go to swingers clubs together. They don't have sex with each other but it's still a bit :shock:
Just clarifying my comment from earlier.
fancying your own blood relatives is strange in my view.
But I think fantasising about sleeping with a pair of twins, or a couple of sisters, is hot because itindicated that they clearly have filthy minds / highly active sex drives. and superfreaks are hot!
Quote by brucie
still no. having sex with sisters who have sex together is no different from having sex with mentally retarded people. you cannot have consent.

Yes it is - what if the sister's both said they wanted to? dunno
Quote by brucie
still no. having sex with sisters who have sex together is no different from having sex with mentally retarded people. you cannot have consent.

Yes it is - what if the sister's both said they wanted to? dunno
what just like that boy with down's syndrome really wanted to down in the woods that day? rolleyes
I don't get what the similarity is between two imaginary sisters and an imaginary boy with down's syndrome when it comes to their ability to consent to sex.
Please explain.
MOD ALERT! MOD ALERT!
Just be careful guys. I'm not locking, but I am watching cool
Mal
wink
Quote by BIoke
still no. having sex with sisters who have sex together is no different from having sex with mentally retarded people. you cannot have consent.

Yes it is - what if the sister's both said they wanted to? dunno
what just like that boy with down's syndrome really wanted to down in the woods that day? rolleyes
I don't get what the similarity is between two imaginary sisters and an imaginary boy with down's syndrome when it comes to their ability to consent to sex.
Please explain.
I think Brucie is of the opinion that sisters who want to play together must be mentally retarded :roll: I'm beginning to think that anyone who plays with Brucie may be a little that way inclined tbh.
Quote by Mal
MOD ALERT! MOD ALERT!
Just be careful guys. I'm not locking, but I am watching cool
Mal
wink

No worries Mal - my post was about their ability to consent, not what was right or wrong. Peronally, the idea of having sex with anyone related (at the same time) makes me wanna hurl. However, brucie compared the sisters with a boy that probably isn't in a position to consent. They are NOT the same thing.. and that was my point smile
Quote by fluff_n_stuff
I think Brucie is of the opinion that sisters who want to play together must be mentally retarded rolleyes

Exactly :thumbup: That was what I was trying to say... :wink:
How can it be considered if twins want to have sex with someone,so long as the third person is not related...there not having intercourse which each over but with someone else, thats not because they are not having sex with each over...same with the mother and daughter fantasy.
Quote by brucie
i consider two sisters in the same bed having sex with one guy as . and i honestly believe that people who have incestious sex have serious issues that make their consent invalid.

Two sisters in the same bed having sex with a third person is not ...no more than it is considered bi-sex for two men to stick their cocks ina woman's minge at the same time!
Quote by brucie
i consider two sisters in the same bed having sex with one guy as .

That would make a voyeur with no sexual contact able to say they were having sex, even though no contact was made.
and i honestly believe that people who have incestious sex have serious issues that make their consent invalid.

They may have issues of whatever kind you want to mention, but implying lack of consent is one of them seems odd in itself and doesn't lend itself to the discussion.
Mal
wink
Quote by brucie
a voyeur is taking part in the sexual act. no contact is needed.
as for consent, in this case i agree its more of an ethical question than a legal one.
i cant believe people on here are arguing that its ok for family members to engage in sexual acts together or in close proximity of each other.

I'm not sure they were saying it is ok, they were saying it wasn't technically and it wasn't a sign that they were somehow mentally deficient because if their sexual preferences.
I think we all acknowledge that its odd.
But who am I to tell anyone what to do or not do?
My opinion is just one of millions. confused
Quote by brucie
you have a moral responsibility to tell people what to do and what not to do.

:lol2: :lol2: :lol2:
Sorry, you were joking weren't you dunno
Quote by brucie
you have a moral responsibility to tell people what to do and what not to do.
.
That coming from the man who pays women for sex!
Quote by brucie
you have a moral responsibility to tell people what to do and what not to do.

No you don't.
Mal
Quote by brucie
im not sure i agree with your logic dude.
doing your mum would be wrong. doesnt necessarily make it hot.

is quite common among adopted children/parents..Meeting your Mum,Dad,Bro,Sis after say 30 years is a quite an experience and there is an awful lot of stuff going on that can lead to sex...Is that wrong...
neutral
Quote by brucie
you have a moral responsibility to tell people what to do and what not to do.
.
That coming from the man who pays women for sex!
i might have been saying some things for effect...
Then I'd stop doing that, right now - seriously. It makes you look like a tosser wink
Quote by brucie
you have a moral responsibility to tell people what to do and what not to do.

No you don't.
Mal
thats a cultural thing. in english law you have no obligation to help a dying man in the street. in french law you do. just an example. but i believe you must get involved if you see something which you believe to be wrong.
Just because you see it and believe it to be wrong, does not mean that you have to get involved.
We seem to be mixing up law and personal morality here - we could all debate until the cows came home if we kept moving the goal posts.
So are we debating from a legal or moral perspective brucie as you don't seem sure and without clarification your logic seems muddled and is hard to follow? confused
Quote by BIoke
you have a moral responsibility to tell people what to do and what not to do.
.
That coming from the man who pays women for sex!
i might have been saying some things for effect...
Then I'd stop doing that, right now - seriously. It makes you look like a tosser wink
Too late for that!
Quote by brucie
im not sure i agree with your logic dude.
doing your mum would be wrong. doesnt necessarily make it hot.

is quite common among adopted children/parents..Meeting your Mum,Dad,Bro,Sis after say 30 years is a quite an experience and there is an awful lot of stuff going on that can lead to sex...Is that wrong...
neutral
yes.
Why wrong.. An example..
A child given up at birth to say a 16 year old girl..They meet 30 years later..(you do the math)..
I do not see how that kind of could possibly be wrong should it occur...
Quote by brucie
lets start at the begining. why is wrong?
whatever the reason, circumstances do not change that.

Brucie you do disappoint me..i believed you a man of the world...reading through previous posts i pictured a well traveled, well educated chap, a keen debater even,open minded....etc...
All your worldly knowledge appears to have stunted you...
Hey ho.. neutral
Quote by brucie
lets start at the begining. why is wrong?
whatever the reason, circumstances do not change that.

The thing is brucie, that wasn't your original post. You asked about fantasies not about itself.
It's a biological problem. Should they have any children then they are highly likely to give birth to a child with genetic defects - hence one of the reasons it's illegal other than the pure sexual reason.
Mal
wink