well to a degree the title says it all......just interested really in as much as the whole idea of swinging really is no emotional link with anyone other than your own partner....( otherwise there would be complications)...so basically it is about good, erotic and sexy fun. So therefore do looks count. If you had a meet and you thought the other person looked like a bag of spanners, would you make excuses..or would you say bugger it... its not emotional its SEX. Have done a poll to see also see if any differance between the men and the ladies.
Have to hold my hand up and say I have had my wicked way with quite a few ladies that to be honest didn't look the best....but still enjoyed the sex.
now theres good in everyone
and too sexual exclude someone on looks alone is a bit shallow
If you mean someone on the lines of 'The Elephant Man', that would take some guts.
From a female point of view, there has to be some sort of attraction whether you're meeting males or females. That doesn't mean they have to be Gods gift. We have met some very nice people who are not that great looking but are gen lovely.
I think personality is far more important than looks, though everyone has standards (i think) lol.
You can have an ugly mind, an ugly soul etc. these would also put people off.
I'll put it in plain English here. A FUCKS A FUCK!
When we first took up swinging we were going to clubs. I have to admit you don't get much chance to chat therefore looks were very important.
The experience wasn't very fulfilling, since joining this site and making so many friends we both realised thats looks were only a very tiny part of swinging. Friendship, trust, personality, were more important and as such we get a lot more out of our experiences.
ok looks still do play a small part as with most peeps there are certain things that are a big turn off.
IMO everyone has their own idea of what they want in a swinging partner but if all your after is a quick f**k then you might as well go into your local town and pick someone up in a bar. Swinging is a whole different ball game
It's all subjective isn't it? What some people find attractive, others don't. Everyone has their own taste and what I consider ugly, someone else might consider beautiful. I personally would not be sexually attracted to someone I considered ugly. Or stupid. Or aggressive. Or vain... looks is only part of it, but it's still a factor.
well i must say i refused to vote who is to decide if another is ugly pretty unfair poll this one and i must also say while there has to be some physical attraction a good personality is much more important
colin
:shock: you mean I might of had a choice...why didn't anyone tell me :doh:
Word of warning.....
Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose.
:giggle:
please note I totally agree beauty and therefore ugliness is very subjective.....but that is not what question asks.....it asks if you would still shag the other person if in your subjective view they were ugly. Really asking how much attractivness has to do with the act of sex.....is it a turn on...or can the lack of it be a total turn off.
the prime example of this is when Brightongezzer said " a fuck is a fuck "
in other words for him it is pure sex.....
where others they couldn't do it....
certainly finding answers interesting anyway.
well i have 2 opinions on this one, if i meet someone off here i find looks are more important than in a club, for example if i go to a club to be honest i will get on a bed and just have fun with anyone who wants to join in, stopping and looking at everyone just limits ur fun so i tend to switch off to looks and just shag lol on more private meets where u have 2 spend time with a person its more inportant, but in answer yes i would shag someone i found ugly lol
Nope couldn't do it, couldn't even get a twitch with someone that is as far removed from what I like as your question is suggesting. There are looks and traits that I find attractive and there are those that I find repulsive, there needs to be an attraction.