Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Your neck of the woods.....

last reply
72 replies
3.4k views
0 watchers
0 likes
1373
mmmmm take off worlass..... and a few that I have fucked.... that leaves about 17......
cool.
2824 Is that good or bad dunno
3898 But I open a london room and only get about 3 londoners in lol
Minxy, where in london are you? I got more than you :P
I refined mine to search for single ladies and couples who are looking for single males, based on a 30 mile radius of my postcode
result = 0
rolleyes
1453 from outer Bristol
Quote by varca
I know where they all are biggrin The number of members of SH cited is actually inaccurate as a lot of accounts are former advert accounts of those who were here pre the Mark buyout circa 2004/5 and that's why you see so many in your locality when you do a search. Once upon a time you had to have two accounts to log in to SH; one for the site/forum in general and the old mirc chatroom and another for your ad profile which used your email address.
If you were a member pre the buyout and had an ad profile, your original email address still resides on here and counts as a member account. Do a search for yours if you were here back then and tick the usrname box and you will find it smile
e.g. for the the whole of the UK I just searched in general for @ and . and ticked the box for username and I got:
161718 accounts @
140413 accounts @
They are all inactive with last logged in dates over 2 weeks
Did the same for @btinternet, @Lycos and @blueyonder etc
That's why it appears that there are so many swingers near to you but you never happen across them.

I dont get it. I was here pre the buy out, I never had two accounts?
3996 with 3 miles of my actual postcode, and this probably doesn't count but there's apparently 5301 within 3 of Leeds city centre. Thought i was on for the win there, but Max has pipped me by a mere 47 users. Bluddy geordies! sad
*shakes fist at sky*
N x x x ;)
145! :shock: Are cows allowed to be members? I'm fairly sure there aren't that many human adults within a 3 mile radius!
I'm certain if one of us lived on the moons of Saturn it would report back that there are at least 1000 swingers within a 3 mile radius, and what is more, they are all gagging for it.
Quote by tweeky
I know where they all are biggrin The number of members of SH cited is actually inaccurate as a lot of accounts are former advert accounts of those who were here pre the Mark buyout circa 2004/5 and that's why you see so many in your locality when you do a search. Once upon a time you had to have two accounts to log in to SH; one for the site/forum in general and the old mirc chatroom and another for your ad profile which used your email address.
If you were a member pre the buyout and had an ad profile, your original email address still resides on here and counts as a member account. Do a search for yours if you were here back then and tick the usrname box and you will find it smile
e.g. for the the whole of the UK I just searched in general for @ and . and ticked the box for username and I got:
161718 accounts @
140413 accounts @
They are all inactive with last logged in dates over 2 weeks
Did the same for @btinternet, @Lycos and @blueyonder etc
That's why it appears that there are so many swingers near to you but you never happen across them.

I dont get it. I was here pre the buy out, I never had two accounts?
Some people, like myself didn't use the photo ads (or know about them) always had this account.
Those members that used the photo ads didn't always know about the forum etc. If they did, perhaps had two different user names and email addresses to access those parts of the site. All areas of the site merged into one easier to use platform with a number of members keeping hold of two accounts.
There was a far lower number of members of the forum/chat room than using the photo ads if I remember correctly. So when people hark back to the *old days* that's why most members of the forum were known.
I got 203 - that's great if you count all the trees rotflmao :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Holy crap Powers! thats a hell of a lot of people!
You must beliving in some penthouse in central central London biggrin
Quote by meat2pleaseu
I refined mine to search for single ladies and couples who are looking for single males, based on a 30 mile radius of my postcode
result = 0
rolleyes

Further proof that meaty is a :wanker:
:eeek: fookin ell he's seen me!!! bolt
2757 results Recently active in London. WOOHOO!!! :bounce:
180 results female. Hmmm... ok then
66 results female looking for males... ok, I can still get to sniff a few panties then! Deep Joy
...Dirtygirly for panties please read Knickers! :thumbup:
3 results females looking for their first experience with a black man! :shock:
1 results females looking for a black man/men to push her up against a wall and stick their fingers/cock inside her before she knows what's happening! :shock:
I'm fink I'm gonna join meaty! redface
...I've just sent a pm to the last one...
her status...
Last Seen: Over 2 Weeks Ago
...Hello meeeeeaty... where are yooooou???
Don't rely on the Blue for a male and Pink for female. I've just seen someone listed as female who is very much a male!
Quote by redpantherman
Further proof that meaty is a :wanker:

Quote by redpantherman
...Hello meeeeeaty... where are yooooou???

Im just jizzing in your sugarpuffs box :haha:
Oooh... my count's just gone up by one!
I just had another thought.... I can set up a search alert to PM me when new users arrive in my area! Fresh meat! :twisted:
There are 390 for my current postcode....
I did a search on my last postcode... the result was 2 !!!!
lol
Quote by minxysub
There are 390 for my current postcode....
I did a search on my last postcode... the result was 2 !!!!
lol

Good move then! :thumbup: ;-)
269 but then we r in a village if i up it to a 10 mile radius which takes in closest town there is 3,474 so best get buying condoms :shock:
Quote by poshkate
324 confused

328 and if they're in distance order then there's someone closer than PK. :shock:
*wonders if pet rabbit has an account* :confused2: :huh:
Quote by easy
324 confused

328 and if they're in distance order then there's someone closer than PK. :shock:
*wonders if pet rabbit has an account* :confused2: :huh:
Have you checked in the wardrobe and under the bed? :giggle: bolt
Quote by Cubes
324 confused

328 and if they're in distance order then there's someone closer than PK. :shock:
*wonders if pet rabbit has an account* :confused2: :huh:
Have you checked in the wardrobe and under the bed? :giggle: bolt
rotflmao PMSL @ the thought that anyone could get in the wardrobe or under the bed. This is PK we're talking about remember? :giggle:
dead man typing (when PK sees this). :uhoh: :bolt: :lol2:
665
18 of which are women looking for men and none of them are active! Best broaden my horizons
Quote by Mr_milehigh
665
18 of which are women looking for men and none of them are active! Best broaden my horizons

Shall we pass you the lube? dunno
Depends what you have in mind wink
Don't think things have become that desperate just yet :moon: