Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Dave__Notts
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 55
Bi-curious Female, 54
0 miles · Nottinghamshire

Forum

Quote by neilinleeds
Better than wankers Trev which is what the emote seems to be alluding to. lol
Used tineye myself before now. If something looks too good to be true it's cos it quite often is. Seem to recall reporting the odd porn star profile pic myself in my time.

I have wondered how you spotted all the porn stars. I just imagined you had the worlds largest porn collection innocent
Dave_Notts
Don't worry boys. At this range, they can't hit a barn do........................
Dave_Notts
Quote by MidsCouple24
My own happy birth story started in Northern Ireland with the birth of my first daughter, I bought my wife the traditional bouquet and card, nothing special and that was that until 2 years later when my second daughter was born in Germany, again the bouquet and card.
It was not until some years later going through a box of Birthday cards, Christmas cards and the Congratulations cards that we realised that I had bought an identical card for each birth, unintentionally and 2 years apart in 2 different countries ?
Perhaps there is such a thing as fate lol

Fate, nope.
Limited NAAFI stock, probably.
Dave_Notts
As a prank it was bloody funny. As someone killing themselves over it, thats sad for them and their family. Will it stop me listening or watching radio or TV pranks? Will it feck. I grew up with Jeremy Beadle and the wacky Japanese who seem to torture their own citizens in the name of TV pranks..........and by hell are the Japenese prank shows funny. How nobody has not had a heart attack on one of those shows yet I don't know.
Dave_Notts
Quote by Ben_Minx
I believe about 2000 get killed and 25,000 get maimed each year though. That's a statistic we need to do something about.

Put it in reverse and the numbers move from one column to the other wink
Dave_Notts
Quote by Steve
What are we now......15 days after Bonfire night yes ?
Still getting fireworks going off at night....

Move your matches away from the blue touch paper dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
I don't really know G dunno
I had my fair share of watching that rubbish and pretending I enjoyed it.
Dave_Notts
Quote by starlightcouple
Well it seems that some would be perfectly ok with children continually being maimed each year through fireworks. People's property will each year be subject to damage through a cheap firework landing on their roof or property. Animals and adults alike will just have to put up with this little inconvenience every year.
Well as long as we have not got Big Brother telling us what to do, then we take the risks and damn the consequences. Am sure the medical profession will be glad of that as they are treating another child terrible maimed by a stray firework, or a firework they were about to let off on the streets.
:thumbup: three cheers for common sense eh?

You're Tony Blair aren't you? wink If you don't agree with Tony then you don't care for the babeeeeeee rotflmao
On a more serious note, if people look after their kids and undertake parental responsibility then the numbers would shoot down. There are enough laws to deal with this.
If the country bans stuff because it hurts children then we would live in a land of cotton wool and bubble wrap.
Dave_Notts
Quote by starlightcouple
The days of general parental responsibility it would seem are long gone. In this instance it does not even have to be a childs parent, it is probably an ' adult ' walking past a shop and the kids ask that ' adult ' to buy them. The adult could be a person who is only just 18. That adult could well be that kids older Brother or a friends older Brother. The point is they manage to get hold of the fireworks.
Of course parents can also show some degree of responsibility, but on many occasions the parents themselves have not got a clue what their kids are up to. Does any parent know what their 13 year old child is doing 24 hours a day? Not many do and I cannot see why any person would not agree that the instances of children maiming themselves for life through fireworks should be taken away, by banning the sale of fireworks to anyone that does not hold a current license issued by the local authority. It would be such an easy thing to do as well.
Only last night a neighbour was letting off fireworks in a garden so small, and kids were standing around watching. The kids may just have well been playing on the edge of a busy road. Maybe people should have a safety awareness course before buying fireworks as people like my neighbour obviously has not got a clue about safety, and not a clue about the dangers of fireworks that can so easily go wrong.

The days of general parental responsibility has long gone? Why? A few people do not take their responsibility seriously, but those millions that do need to be legislated for?
Doesn't make sense to me. Seems like a knee jerk reaction to something that cannot be understood..............so ban it. Something that the goverment tried to reclaim through "Common Sense, Common Safety". Obviously something else that failed by the government, as they thought it was the "jobsworths" where it now seems it is the public themselves that call for the bans
Dave_Notts
Quote by mickrenney
Well guess not, but do please let me know if anybody has some luck with this lady... I can spot a timewaster a mile off! So like I said, prepared to eat humble pie if I am proven wrong...Actually the pie is in the oven!

If someone does post..........then all it will prove is that whoever posts "they have met her", knows nothing of discretion.
Dave_Notts
Or if they had half a brain, can pm me? banghead
Still indiscrete
Dave_Notts
Quote by starlightcouple
This is not about banning for banning sake, this is about preventing many things and the most important is serious injury to children. How can anyone be against that?

Absolutely..........so where is the parental responsibility? It is not the law or the act of setting off type 1 or 2 fireworks that is the problem. It is parental or personal responsibility that is the main factor in most of the accidents involving fireworks. Individuals need to take responsibilty for their own actions.
Dave_Notts
Quote by mickrenney
Well guess not, but do please let me know if anybody has some luck with this lady... I can spot a timewaster a mile off! So like I said, prepared to eat humble pie if I am proven wrong...Actually the pie is in the oven!

If someone does post..........then all it will prove is that whoever posts "they have met her", knows nothing of discretion.
Dave_Notts
Quote by Trevaunance
Firefighters, as we have been called for 20 years, are not bomb disposal experts. That is true.
MP's are not * either.
The specific example was a woman who had petrol in in shed/garage to fill her sit on lawn mower. She decided to decant some of it into a (get this) ice cream tub (!) so her daughter could drive her children less than 1/4 mile to school.
There are so many things wrong with that sentence it makes me want to scream. But to do that action in an enclosed space with a lit gas cooker hob and a scented candle in the room is plain stupid.
No MP, or anyone else can be held responsible for this level of lunacy.

This was my point............spot on!!!!
It is about time people woke up and smelt the coffee when it comes to taking responsibility for their own stupid actions.
Trying to make a 5 litre fuel can into 5 gallons then 40 gallons............ is making excuses for the stupid. The man had a poor use of words..........where the papers and others seem to extend what he said to fit their opinion and agenda.
Dave_Notts
Quote by MidsCouple24
Yes this one about football prices, the last one was telling us to store petrol in our homes or garages (illegal and dangerous) and people could probably find a multitude of other "gaffs" from people that are supposed to be the best available at solving our problems not creating them

Wasn't his statement "store a bit of extra fuel in a jerry can in the garage"? Maybe a poor choice of words, but what was his intention and advice? I cannot read into this that he advocates that you make your house into a petrol bomb nor did he advise a bright, educated woman and daughter to take petrol into a kitchen and decant it. They took that decision and paid the price for their stupidity. I have sympathy for them and wish them full recovery, but it was their stupid action and they were not following the MPs advice as they had stored it for years in the garage for their lawn-mower.
Dave_Notts
Isn't Aussie and Brit law able to be used cross boundaries? Something to do with the Aussies having a British style legal system where Aussie precedent has the same legal binding as Brit precedent. Anyway, this could all be bollox and it came to me in a drunken dream one night.
The warning does have a legal standing in law. It was explained by a lady from this site who had a bit of knowledge about these kind of things. However, if you put it on you would also have to be willing to go to court and out yourself in a public domain. The best thing is to think what you post or upload (photos). If you do not really want it being put up else where, then do not add it in the first place to an internet sytem.
Instead of clogging up forums with inane drivel (similar to what I do on a daily basis :silly: ).
Dave_Notts
Quote by starlightcouple
Can't think what star is going to make of the new format.....

Ermmmmmmmmm..........Change for change sake I think. Sometimes owners of whatever feel the need to tinker here or tinker there, so the members think they are not just sitting around taking the money. But I have to say in so many instances ' if it ain't broke etc '.
Still I am sure there is a good reason. wink
There was........................
................I broke the last one. I have been told not to touch anymore buttons
Dave_Notts
I am now going to add Professional to my profile since so many dislike it :twisted:
Dave_Notts
Quote by GnV
I agree with you that minefields were used effectively in denying ground to enemy forces and these were often well marked as such. I think the difference here to which star alludes, is that the 'enemy' is not respecting the' new world order' on the use of these devices to which Diana contributed so much but as they continue to use them in their arsenal of terror creation, they are thus 'cowards'.
One of the reasons behind the withdrawal of these devices is that their positions are often undocumented and they are non-discriminatory in their deployment. Often, long after the 'battle' has been fought in that area, whether won or lost, innocent lives are lost or irreversably changed by coming into contact with them whilst going about their ordinary everyday lawful existence.

I agree that the mine is indescriminate. The banning of them by governments that control their military is a correct way to do things. However, when your government has been overthrown by an external power and you have no military forces then the only way you can fight is by guerilla methods. It worked for the French Resistance, Viet Cong, Spanish.........and is a type of warfare that is centuries old. It will always happen, and when one side has superior weaponary then the other will have to make do.
To stand and fight, the force has to have a half decent chance of surviving........otherwise they bug out and withdraw to another position that may equal up the diadvantage. So if the British Army does not have a better than average chance that the soldiers would survive then they would not commit the troops to the operation. Is that cowardly of the Brits? Bloody no in my books.........just sensible. Same as these Afghan fighters. Use whatever you have to complete your mission and stay alive to fight another day.
It is sad that innocent people will die horribly and I feel for them. Who asked who to be invaded? The Afghans did not say "Hey, Brits & Yanks. Come and invade us." The US and allied Governments are responsible for the 400 names on the memorial in Alrewas.
I want all, including Harry, to come home alive. But I cannot blame a people fighting for their freedom from an alien agressor in their lands. Same as I cannot blame a Brit for killing as they are only doing their job. It is the government (and past governments) to blame
Dave_Notts
The man came and went to Cabinet 4 times that day. 3 times he came and went through the main gate. On the 4th time he was prevented leaving through the gate.
Why?
As for the section 5, I too watch night cops on tv and notice that they are told a number of times to stop swearing before they are ticketed or arrested. This looks like a one off from someone who was pissed off over being stopped doing something he has been allowed to do all day.
As for the words he used, like Rob, I don't really care. The main support seems to be the opposition (no surprise) and the Police Fedreation (no surprise again) as the cuts are going to affect their membership. So of course these will try and keep this going.
Dave_Notts
Did I miss the post where it was shown that NIL was very wrong in what he said?
An IED is an explosive that is used to kill by someone standing on it, driving over it or being detonated by stand off. A bit like a mine, that were used in the millions by the British Army in WW2 and some types are still used today..........hang on a minute. If these insurgents are cowards for using their IEDs/mine what does that make the soldiers of the UK, past and present????
Or another way of thinking of an IED is to instill fear into those on the ground to do what the opposition wants. In other words, the art of war. A mine is to deny ground to the enemy without the need to risk life.
So are they cowards? Definately not, same as I would not call an allied soldier a coward for using them. They are just another tool for doing a very awful job. A job that no person should ever aspire to or want to do. Unfotunately, as I cannot see conflict stopping then unfortunately there will be young men and women dying for their governments/leaders.
Dave_Notts
Top tip of the day. Don't bother contacting the local authority or any central government body to enforce the DDA as it is down to the individual or group to take the business/entity to an employment tribunal if they feel their rights have been wronged.
Dave_Notts
Quote by tweeky
Give whoever you want whatever you like, even up all the scores and on a 1-1 basis I'll back the UK armed forces everytime.

Everytime? We, the yanks and Dutch fucked up in 1941. That was a war with no margin of superiority. We had the defense, which is an advantage, and still threw it away. The Japanese simply out-thought and out-fought all three.
After 41 & 42 there was dispute they would lose as the allies out supplied them which made the final outcome inevitable.
Dave_Notts
Quote by Meeko
I always take a second look and a third and then normally have to slam my foot on the break just before I hit the car in-front of me..
I am a terrible perve and can't hide the fact, Good job Shi is just as bad as me and lets me know if I have missed anything :lol2:

So you can slam it into reverse and have another go?
bolt
Dave_Notts