Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Mike7073
1 month ago
Bisexual Male, 48
0 miles · Greater London

Forum

Hi all,
I'm a bi-male who lives near the big country park in Hornchurch.
I'm currently not working and would like to meet men/women/couples for daytime fun.
Being a non-driver, I usually take my bike over the park. I've been told that daytime fun happens, but on my few visits I have yet to encounter any.
I'll be going over there regularly in the coming weeks and would be happy to meet up with like minded people, even if it's just for a bit of a chat.
Get in touch smile
Now I do like the whole nurse thing, but it would have to be an outfit that closely resembles an actual nurse (possibly one of the more old fashioned 80's-90's ones).
Actual 'sexy nurse' outfits don't look like nurses outfits. Don't get me wrong, a woman can still look mighty sexy in one, but for me the whole nurse fantasy is based upon an actual nurse coming on to you.
I think one of the biggest problems with swinging and people outside the scene is quite simply their lack of experience of what it actually is.
Most people still think it involves something akin to putting keys on a bowl and then arbitrarily picking from the bowl, with partners having little say.
There is only one person who knows that I have done things like this but there are others that I have tried to educate a little but saying something less shocking that "I'm a swinger". Normally I say "I've moved in swinger circles". It's a nice way of saying I have experience but I'm not telling you what or how much and most people don't ask. They probably prefer to think that I've just known people who do. People don't like uncomfortable truths about people they care about.
So yeah, I think if people knew more about it and how it is more like dating but with sex much more 'on the table', there would be less of a stigma.
Good topic and totally understand where the OP is coming from.
With regard to feeling completely differently after you've cum, well that's fairly normal. I'm sure most guys have had a wank and felt a bit silly (maybe even ashamed) right after they finish.
I've always described my self as sexually bisexual, but emotionally straight. It's a term I use whenever I'm chatting to bi men or Bi-m couples on here. It is a nice shorthand way of explaining things.
To give you something to think about I'll tell you how I got into the bi side of things...
I've always had a high sex drive and one evening in my 20's, whilst at a party I was sitting in a small group, there were a couple of gay guys. In amongst the general chat one of the guys said that he was always bottom (or the receiver, I think might have been his actual words).
A few days later I was horny watching some porn and that line came back to me. I thought that if there are guys who only like that, then it must feel good in some way.
SO being someone who would rather regret having done something, than regret never having done something, I decided to see if I could arrange it.
I was on a different site and after a lot of messages to different people, chatted to a guy and he came over.
There was mutual oral and he took my anal cherry.
I'll be honest, I didn't enjoy it. I don't think it was the act itself, I think it was a combination of things. Me being nervous, there not really being enough lube and the feeling of wham-bam-thankyou-man, that came of it.
That put me off for a bit, but I decided to try again after a while.
One evening on here I advertised for a guy. Nothing much came back that I felt comfortable with, so I went out. I came back to find a message (amazingly) from a couple.
I went over there soon after and we had a really relaxing evening, slow build up and we all had sex. O and A (both ways) for us guys. It was a good experience and from that I started occasionally meeting other guys.
I'm still mostly into women, but I completely accept that I like a cock up my arse. You say about how it is a 'gay activity'. It's really not. Sex is about what feels good and if you like a to suck cock or like me, have the occasional anal fuck, that just means you have a sexual kink. Being gay (so far as I can tell) is about much more than that.
I'd encourage you to dabble. It can be great fun, especially with a couple.
I'm still looking to fulfill a fantasy of being in the middle of a couple, me fucking her while he's fucking me. After the mindblowing orgasms I've had from anal sex alone (seriously, a lifelike dildo is a great investment), I can only imagine how good that would be!
Wow, that got a bit longer than I had planned.
To summerise: You have one life to experience things. Go find out if you like it or not. You might be very happy that you did.
Hey there,
been on sh swinger for donkeys. Depending on location (for travel logistics) I'd like to be considered for this. I live in Romford, so generally it shouldnt be an issue with the travelling.
Cheers.
I'm free.
I also have a 2nd account which I know the login for, but never use. Shall I include this for your list?
Does anyone want to bribe me for ownership? wink
I'm only on page one of this, but thought I'd throw in a reply at this point, so sorry if this has already been said.
I totally understand people not wanting to pay when there are free members, but I don't think charging the free members is the way to go.
I am a free member and the way I see it is this...
The reason this site was so attractive to the company which bought it, was because of the massive existing userbase. That userbase is what made/makes the site. Without those users, this site would not have been worth anyone paying for. I doubt many of the paying members would have signed up in the first place. I have a little experience with that. I was party to a new swinging site start-up a few years ago. It started well, small but fun. At first it was free for us lot who helped start it and free for newbies. Then due to financial matters it was only free for 3 months for new users, then it was only free for a month due to low revenues. The problem was that there was no 'free' time to build the userbase to make it worth paying for, and that is what the free users did for this site.
As a free user I have to say that my activity on this site is sporadic. If I had to pay I would go elsewhere (nevermind any recriminations about the promise that was made, to never charge existing members (indeed, there was initially a similar promise to never introduce tiered paid membership, which there now is)) as would a lot of others, I believe.
Yes there are new features, but just as they CAN be an aide to finding a good swing meet, they also make it easier and more attractive to the people who don't actually understand swinging and thin it's all about a quick shag (not to slight the genuine swingers who like their swinging that way).
Aside from the potential ramifications of a mass exodus of free members, you ask the question about it being unfair to charge the ones who joined after the takeover.
Well is it fair to charge the people who made the site what it is?
I've lost my email with the hotel links in it!!!
HnS has not replied yet and I'm starting to get worried I won't get a room if I don't book soon. Can someone who has this email forward it on to me please smile
Ohhhh this is right near me. Well in Essex.
Can I come please????
Purleeeeeesssseeee
Awwww, turns out something has come up and I' going to be unavailable from thursday until saturday sad
Ah well, maybe next time.
Hope you have a good time Bob and Lisa smile
Has an old timer in the SH essex circle, can I jump on that reserve list please?
We have an issue in the Bi/gay wank room with the room host kicking a user for no apparent reason and with no warning.
We are all asking why and who the owner is, but we are receiving silence and would like this dealt with please
thankyou
Does anyone who is going fancy sharing a hotel room or something? Obviously I mean in a no messing around way.
I know i'm a single male, but I have a few people who can probably vouch for me not being a tosser biggrin
You know, I PM'd you about this before the season started, but you never included my team sad
It'd be interesting to see how my team would be doing in your league.
In my own, I am leading one by a long way, leading another by 23 points and 10th in a huge league of over 60 people.
I can answer from my point of view (you'll notice that my profile does indeed say 'Almost Single'
Earlier in the year I split with my gf because she had fallen in love with someone else.
I quickly realised that I wanted to give it another try, because I felt that we worked well together and I didn't want to just dump her and have regrets later.
I made it clear that I wanted her back, but she wasn't sure what she wanted, she didn't want to be with this other guy as they had decided to stay friends instead, but to her it brought up issues about our relationship (she *really* is not one for cheating).
So although I wanted her back, I was the wronged party and I was/am not going to hang on like a puppy dog waiting for her to make her mind up. I told her that until we are back together I will be leading my life as a single man, so i have been. I'd still like to get back with her but it doesn't look good.
So I class myself as single but with a few ties, so 'Almost single' seemed to be more honest than saying I was single.
Quote by vodkatonic
my wandering hands ???
I didnt notice yours were still nor hear any complaints wink
hope to meet again sometime xxxx

True on both counts biggrin
Meeting you again would be a very good thing :twisted:
Cheers Tony smile
It was great to see some familiar faces and some new ones too! Meeting Tatty for the first time after all these years was very cool, you're a lovely lass, good to meet vodkatonic and her wandering hands!
Nice to chat to Redhair, if very briefly, and Tabbi and lots of others. The couple I sat down with and chatted to for a while were very nice but my memory refuses to give me the names.
My memory for names has always been appalling so sorry if I have forgotten anyone redface
Cheers to Mr D for the lift back and to Chard and friend for the hilarious banter.
See you all at the next one I hope
Hey tony mate smile
I thought I should stop being so lazy and put my name down here.
Looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and some new ones.
I take it it's at the same place as usual
I think it is good business sense and totally with their rights to link from this site to the dating site. However I also agree that it will fill up with swingers from here who don't realise the difference as well as the new free members from here who rather than pay here, can get a full membership there for a year.
I think a good idea would be that instead of the link from here going directly to the front page of the dating site, it should go to an in-between page that says in big bold unmistakable letters 'This is NOT a swinging site but a normal dating site. If you want to swing, keep it to swinging heaven' with a link at the end to proceed to the main dating site. If you make sure that there is no link on the dating page to that disclaimer, then the singles won't know about the affiliation.
Mike
I like the ideas put forward. A lot of them seem to be directed towards stopping the idiot single blokes from annoying the couples and fems with repeated abuse and whispering.
With that in mind, would it be possible to introduce a system where the decent, polite genuine single blokes could be listed in a different colour, so people will know that they are decent caps and all that.
I ask because what with the fools that abound in the rooms, I hate being tarred with the same brush and it seems that if there are things to punish idiots, it would be good to reward the good guys. I would very much like to stroll into the chatroom and have the couples and singles instantly know that I'm not an idiot and am worth talking to.
Clearly these people would have to be nominated by somone and approved by an op or someone who has been here for ages and ages.
Hey there, I'm off to the Reading Festival this weekend (will be there on Wednesday), so i was wondering who from here is going and if you are going, why don't we all get together for a drink in town.
I know the town very well, so if people are interested, I'll work out a place and time
Mike
I'm soooo annoyed about saturday mad
I was held up at work, so was going to be late anyway, but got my train ticket and got to Liverpool street to find that because someone had jumped in front of a train, the trains to Ponders End were being cancelled all over the place, so I couldn't get there sad
I was really looking forward to this aswell
:(
Quote by shayz1
I've followed this thread through and a thought that occurred to me is that when checking out womens profiles, a lot are blank. I understand why that might be... but it doesn't help the poser of the original question or anyone else get an answer as to why women are on site.. Men are castigated in various postings for not having profiles and info generally but women are there ...just because they are?? Can anyone explain why any member of the site gets away with no profile even if it says I do not choose to have a profile?
Also I have only just realised that some people do have adverts but they are not connected to their profile. This might also help men like me who want to connect to like minded people, send realistic proposals to women they think might be suitable?
Shay

There can be many reasons.
Okay I'm a bloke, but the reason my profile is incomplete and I don't have an ad, is that I like to meet people through the chatroom. In there I can get some sort of rapport (is that how it's spelled????) with them as this is very important to me. I also don't have pics, because usually I have my (face) cam turned on, so I don't really see the point.
I don't even post in the forum much either, mainly because on other non-swinging sites, my dry humour often comes across as simply insulting and I wouldn't want people to think I'm like that. In live chat, it is easier to show who you are.
Would it be possible for there to be a feature where I can specify how long the idle time is before I a user is logged out?
I ask this because I just spent ages writing a reply to someone, a really good and long one (like everyone says, one liners are crap) clicked the submit button and found I was no longer logged in. Pressing back didn't help and my letter was lost. I've written another one, but it just doesn't seem to be as good as the last one and it is all a bit annoying sad
Surely there could be something in the 'My settings' bit where you could specify an 'idle' time.
Mike
When I read the initial post, I thought he was having a joke, maybe trying to break the ice and all that.
I think it's a little sad that people are being so quick to jump on him.
Bad form people, not up to your usual friendly standards.
I don't post here much as I'm usually too busy to keep up with all the posts each day, but I use the chatroom lots and lots, this shall be a rare post smile
I've just read the whole thread (took a bit of time redface ) and have a few things to say about it all.
Firstly, the winks are a bit odd. When first introduced, I didn't realise what they were. I thought it would be the equivalent of, quite litterally, winking at someone to let them know you are online. I did it to a couple of people I know, before I realised it sends a crappy 'one liner' style message. Now I know, I shall not be using them again.
As a whole though, are they really a bad thing? It seems to me that it will simply make it easier for people to spot the timewasters. Whenever I reply to an ad, I always write a nice long letter, but rarely get a response. I always assumed that this was probably because people were tired of having 15 million crap mails and by the time they got to mine, they had started to delete them without even reading them.
Maybe an answer to this, would be not to simply have an optional block on winks, but maybe a filter. The filter could be set up so that if the message has a certain phrase in it, it is automatically deleted.
The main problem I noticed was the 'stealth mode'.
I have already chatted to a few people who are unhappy about that. It annoys me too, because I used to enjoy a face to face chat with them, but now they won't come on cam because people are hiding behind their stealth mode. I was thinking of upgrading to Extras, but now that I hear I will automatically be on stealth mode, I won't be doing it. I agree that it is a bad idea and will attract the wrong kind of people to this site.
To all the members who have objected to it...
I really do understand your concern, but are you going over the top a teeny bit? I like to know who is watching me too, but usually I don't know them and I'm sure most of the people watching you, you didn't know, nor even notice half the time. So is there a huge difference?
After people have already paid for the extras package, taking stealth away isn't an option. However, would it be possible to add the option to block stealth people from viewing my cam? You could even make this part of the extras pack.
I hope something like this can be sorted out, because I like the look of some of the options in the Extras, but I don't want to stealth, be stealthed or be treated with suspicion in the chatroom for having an extras 'x'
Ahhhh, that's a shame.
I was chatting to you in the chatroom just now but you dissapeared sad
I'm not 21 or under so I'm sorry to dissapoint you or to have gotten your hopes up.
Hope you find someone
Mike7073