The MSp in question is not a Right Honourable, or even an Honourable.
Anyway we should all decry any newspaper focus on swinging as who knows who may be next. We are all entitled to a private life, even MSPs.
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
martie
1 month ago
Bisexual Male, 63
0 miles · Skipton
Forum
Quote by Shireen_MidsBut you are assuming that we have additional disposable income to fund these increases...
Some of us work on a tight budget and this sort of thing means that we have to re-evaluate our spending...
Not everyone has a bottomless pit of money you know :roll:
But if things are that tight you can save the extra cash by driving a large vehicle (4X4, sports car, luxury limo) a little slower (perhaps at 60 rather than 70). And it's not an attack on 4X4s - that's just a media portrayal - several 4X4s aren't hit - just the one's with big engines that pump out lots of pollution - as do large limos, sports cars etc.
:x :xQuote by westerross
never quite understood why if a sign stays 30..... you have to do over 30
or if a sign says 50... you have to do over 50....
or on a motorways is the national speed limit is 70... why people have to do 85...
This got me thinking a bit. So I did a back of the fag packet calculation (please don't say 'why do you have to smoke?'
).If the average cardriver does 10,000 miles a year and let's say that they are in a hurry and spend 50% of that breaking the speed limit by say 10 miles an hour - that means that they save 10,000 X 0.5 divided by 10 = 500 hours a year.
Now the value of journey time savings on average is calculated to be just under £9 an hour (last time I looked) so that person is gaining £4500 a year. That might be the answer to Fabio's question.
Don't misunderstand me I'm not advocating breaking the speed limit - but it could be part of the reason, don't you think?
Sorry, you have made a huge errror in your calculation.
If someone does 10,000 miles a year their saving will be a fraction of yours, depending on their average speed (with a 10% uplift and 50 % of the time).
Thus if they average 40 mph their saving is (10,000 / 40 x 10%) X 0.5
Thus they may save 12.5 hours, which at an average £9 per hour is
Of course the extra speed will add to their fuel consumption, reducing the saving. Further, in towns at least, much of the saving is illusory - they just wait for longer at the next red light.
Quote by westerross
never quite understood why if a sign stays 30..... you have to do over 30
or if a sign says 50... you have to do over 50....
or on a motorways is the national speed limit is 70... why people have to do 85...
This got me thinking a bit. So I did a back of the fag packet calculation (please don't say 'why do you have to smoke?'
).If the average cardriver does 10,000 miles a year and let's say that they are in a hurry and spend 50% of that breaking the speed limit by say 10 miles an hour - that means that they save 10,000 X 0.5 divided by 10 = 500 hours a year.
Now the value of journey time savings on average is calculated to be just under £9 an hour (last time I looked) so that person is gaining £4500 a year. That might be the answer to Fabio's question.
Don't misunderstand me I'm not advocating breaking the speed limit - but it could be part of the reason, don't you think?
Sorry, you have made a huge errror in your calculation.
If someone does 10,000 miles a year their saving will be a fraction of yours, depending on their average speed (with a 10% uplift and 50 % of the time).
Thus if they average 40 mph their saving is (10,000 / 40 x 10%) X 0.5
Thus they may save 12.5 hours, which at an average £9 per hour is
Of course the extra speed will add to their fuel consumption, reducing the saving. Further, in towns at least, much of the saving is illusory - they just wait for longer at the next red light.
Sexy Steph wrote:
Unfortunately copyright rests with the person taking the photo. Which means if they wish to sell to the 'News of The Screws' then they can. That's why photography is not allowed against the BCCN code of conduct for naturists, and why e.g. Cap D'Agde bans camera work.
However anyone using a camera phone obviously has no manners, apart from which the quality is abysmal.
Did you get their phone number hunni? If so just call them and ask them to understand that any pictures belong to the people in them and if they go somewhere they should not then you will not hesitate to sue.
Unfortunately copyright rests with the person taking the photo. Which means if they wish to sell to the 'News of The Screws' then they can. That's why photography is not allowed against the BCCN code of conduct for naturists, and why e.g. Cap D'Agde bans camera work.
However anyone using a camera phone obviously has no manners, apart from which the quality is abysmal.
Good Question.
I am a naturist, and started off simply as a naturist who enjoyed being nude in the sun.
Then at Studland I realised that more could be available with a couple with whom I was talking on the beach. I now find that a session of swinging after being on the beach is a good way to round off the day.
I am sure that others have had similar histories.
I am a naturist, and started off simply as a naturist who enjoyed being nude in the sun.
Then at Studland I realised that more could be available with a couple with whom I was talking on the beach. I now find that a session of swinging after being on the beach is a good way to round off the day.
I am sure that others have had similar histories.
