Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

New Tagging Of Pics feature !!!

last reply
276 replies
12.7k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by benrums0n
I agree that SH is pretty dire at communication.
In terms of privacy though I always work on the basis that anything I send to a WEB site becomes public. Its not a terribly secure environment.

very true..but there is a difference between public and "at disposal of a money making company to do as they see fit with it"..especially if the company in question is paid by me in the first place to serve as a social network in wich to play in safety...it's a bit taking the piss
in fact, I guess we're all to blame, partially, in that probably 90% of us, including me, have just pressed the "I agree" button without actually reading the contract we were signing
I've been reading through the contract today and there are a few things that really make me laugh out loud..
the notion that a clause can be put in a contract, saying that one of the parties is free to modify said contract as they please and say fit is worthy of a prize for comedy.
If I were to unilaterally change the commercial conditions of any contract I have going with any of my customers, in whatever small detail, my company would get sued for all they're worth.
on the same principle, if, until today, the website has acted in one way about my pics, and now intends to change the way they act about it, the right thing to do would be to ask me to confirm my agreement with the new conditions under which the website operates.
now I'm of course sure that all of this is covered in some other half hidden clause..and that there are probably half a dozen legal arguments against what I just said..
but still..the possibility to opt out of new "improvements" and variations should be granted at every stage, and not entertain a loss of privileges.
actually, if someone of the mods or admins could tell me where in the contract I've signed over the rights to my personal image to them, I'd appreciate it, because I might have missed it (Serious question, I'm not trying to be funny)
as I see it, I've given this website my pic for them to custody, and to allow me to use it within the closed circuit of this website, through the "instruments" that this website is made of..
I've paid for them to store the immage..not for them to use it..the same way a photography studio is paid to print my holiday photographies, and is not allowed to put any of them in the shop-window.
come to think of it, they would be better off with professional pics anyway. if they want to lure members through pics, let them use their own..or have some made by someone willing, or paid for it.
Quote by Angel Chat
Seems like as soon as we upload anything it automatically becomes Swinging Heaven's property

Erm . . . yup! lol
Quote by SH T&Cs Clause 10.2
10.2 Where you submit any contribution or posting to any of the Company�s websites you agree by submitting your contribution to grant the Company a perpetual, royalty free, non-exclusive right and licence (including the right to sub-licence) to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish and exercise all copyright with respect to your contribution world wide.
From here: http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/main/terms-and-conditions.html

Course, those T&Cs didn't exist when I clicked the accept button when I registered my account, so I've never explicitly consented to worldwide syndication and all that bollox, and as far as I'm concerned, as the author of all the content I submit, the copyright belongs to me, and my consent needs to be actively sought, but I'm quite sure SH's lawyers would say that my continued use of the site amounts to me giving them explicit consent to do WTF they like.
That would seem to explain Admins belief that they don't have to bother informing us of changes they bring in, unless of course, it's something they can sell. Quick enough to let us know of new chargeable features on our homepages when it suits, and quick enough to put up anonymous polls without discussion, but never quite so quick at letting us know what they're doing with our content. Hey ho! rolleyes
N x x x ;)
Quote by Dirtygirly
Slightly off on a tangent from the tagging but you should be aware, if you are not already, that by uploading your photos into a public album they are automatically inserted into the public gallery which can be viewed by non-members.
If you do not wish your photos to be in the public gallery then you must keep them in your private gallery where no-one can see them other than the people you specifically invite.
HTH

This is a good point for people to be aware of and I have made a suggestion within this thread to allow more control of your own photos. The suggestion I have made is for us to have the option to tag our pics as 18+ and for that option not to be exclusive to admin / mods. 18+ tagged pics can not be seen by non members...
Ste
Basically a very simple answer would be to be given the option when uploading pictures
1. Private
2. Friends Only
3. Anyone (meaning anyone viewing your account can see them)
4. Do you wish them to be included in the gallery.
Come on SH giving us what we want lol
I wonder if thought there would be no problems putting her pictures on public display. She made a conscious decision to make her photos public. Unless people on here understood that photos in their profiles, which cannot be viewed by non-site members, would be made available for the general public to view via the gallery, they have had that decision made for them by the owners. If Natasha eventually loses her job she can only blame herself. Who will Swinging Heaven members blame if photos in the gallery cause them serious problems in real life?
Who's first to litigation? lol
A sensible point Soul Girl, but giving us (swingers) what we want, isn't really the remit here.
It is about maximising income from the site, to do that you cater for the bigger market. Who are masturbating single males, who are generally not swingers, but who like the pics, cams, chat and videos on this site. So you make it easy for them to get what they want, more join and hey presto, more money.
Basically our pics, videos etc have now become the wank fodder of the fantasist single male (or female - though I would venture there are far fewer), the site is becoming, as I stated a long time ago in this thread, simply a treasure trove of amateur porn for the online wanker.
The fact of the matter is, swingers are not lucrative enough nowadays. They are too busy trying to have fun and doing what the site was originally intended for. Sadly that didn't include making a shed load of cash for the owners.
Out of the supposed 976,315 members, how many do you reckon are real swinging couples, swinging single men or women? Check how many people are in chat or in the forums on a daily basis, then check how many actually contribute. The actual number is far, far less. The silent majority, who no doubt cast their votes (and more to the point, pay their subscription fees), must then be the ones who need pics sorting and rating for ease of viewing.
Like it or not, financially it makes plenty of sense to do this. Cater for the bigger market. It isn't about improving the site for swingers, it is about improving the site for those who pay and the majority of those, I would venture, have no interest in swinging as such, but simply use the site as a fantasy and masturbatory aid.
The thing is, I can accept that. Who hasn't had a good ogle at pictures and videos on here? I can understand the need to increase revenue.
What I can't understand is the need to try and brainwash the populace into thinking that these new moves will somehow benefit those people on here who actually try and use the site for it's original purpose. There is a tasteless arrogance to the way these have been implemented on the site. The wording used on the rating system is poorly written, laughably ambiguous and will result precisely in the pictures being rated on quality of the content, rather than supposedly the picture quality. It is open to abuse, likely to cause offense and will contribute nothing to the swinging experience.
There is also a somewhat supercillious attitude of "We know what's best for you all, even if you don't" that comes from the powers that be, that I find a little disconcerting. With the greatest of respect, I don't think many people have been fooled by these improvements at all. The arguments for their implementation to help swingers get what they want are not just flawed and illogical, but almost nonsensical. If anything, the fact that now a great many genuine swingers have all moved their pics into private galleries has not only hindered the likelihood of people actually meeting, but also decreased the number and quality of pictures on offer for your intended target market. I can only conclude that it has been entirely counter-productive on almost every level.
I've heard it said that the forum is a "tiny minority" on the site. That may be the case when compared to the reported member numbers. However it is people on the forum, and in the chat rooms, who have made the site what it is. Without their input, photo's and videos, the site would appeal to far fewer people. To dismiss them as a "tiny minority" when the vast majority have profiles that contain little or nothing of use and certainly nothing to attract your target market to the site, is rather harsh.
There is a balance that can be found to keep both sides happy and SH owners in profit. However, pandering to your larger market, while deriding the wishes of the people who bring in that target market, and then riding roughshod over their complaints and views when made, is not the way to do this. If you want more people paying for the site, then make it a swinging site that the swinging fraternity want. They will then put up the very items that attract the majority of your target market. A virtuous circle, everyone gets what they want.
But please, don't take us for fools. I can understand the need to diversify and improve income, but please don't pull the wool over our eyes and pretend it is for our own good. I think that irks people even more than the original 'improvements' in the first place.
We went away for a week, and what has happened on the site this time??
We for one couple will not renew our two memberships when they expire this time, so thats two renewals lost.
I so agree with you Ben, once the internet has something, it is then not safe.
My photos on here have been stolen, and then e-mailed to someone else on here, he passed them off as his wife, the member on here informed us. Also my photos which are on here, are now on another swingers site, a friend showed us, another chap passing them off as his wife again. All SH water marks had been removed.
Disgruntled.
However you dont even have to join the site to view the "Gallery" pictures.
If you log out of the site, you can still see "samples" of the site so if you click on gallery you get a sample of the photos. Also applies to most of the other features the site offers.
I can't help but notice that the admin's original participation to the topic has dwindled to nothing.
Quote by Resonance
If anything, the fact that now a great many genuine swingers have all moved their pics into private galleries has not only hindered the likelihood of people actually meeting, but also decreased the number and quality of pictures on offer for your intended target market. I can only conclude that it has been entirely counter-productive on almost every level.

Predictable, but true. I couldn't agree more. :thumbup:
Quote by Melting_pot
I can't help but notice that the admin's original participation to the topic has dwindled to nothing.

says it all really they just dont give a shit for paying members
Quote by soul_girl
Basically a very simple answer would be to be given the option when uploading pictures
1. Private
2. Friends Only
3. Anyone (meaning anyone viewing your account can see them)
4. Do you wish them to be included in the gallery.
Come on SH giving us what we want lol

Oh now that is a nice idea! Well thought of :thumbup:
Quote by Dawnie
Basically a very simple answer would be to be given the option when uploading pictures
1. Private
2. Friends Only
3. Anyone (meaning anyone viewing your account can see them)
4. Do you wish them to be included in the gallery.
Come on SH giving us what we want lol

Oh now that is a nice idea! Well thought of :thumbup:
How about: -
1) Profile - Ones that appear on you're profile (Obviously)
2) Private - Ones that you have to invite people to see
3) Friends - For your friends list to see
None of the above will feature in the Public Gallery unless you tick a box that gives permission for them to be public, that way people can make public any of their pictures or not as the case may be.
The automatic setting should be set at not for Public Gallery so people choose to opt into it rather then opt out, as I dont think many people realise their pictures are actually going into the gallery at the moment!
Sorry to rant, but how come, even after I have tagged them are they still asking to be tagged!
I had a line on my profile explaining that I didn't want my pics tagged by strangers, and I got grief for it!
I tagged my own, but they are still asking to be tagged......come on, play fair.....
Sorry if this has been done to death but this does not make swinging fun for me...
M
xx
Quote by Sexymexy
Sorry to rant, but how come, even after I have tagged them are they still asking to be tagged!
I had a line on my profile explaining that I didn't want my pics tagged by strangers, and I got grief for it!
I tagged my own, but they are still asking to be tagged......come on, play fair.....
Sorry if this has been done to death but this does not make swinging fun for me...
M
xx

You are correct, I was able to tag one of your pictures but I swear I never enjoyed it redface
I noticed tonight that you can no longer have pics that are neither public or private. you used to be able to have ones that you could send in mail messages that were completely private.... thats were are face pic was... we'd like this option back too....
come on sh boffins where have you dissapeared to?
Quote by Dawnie
Sorry to rant, but how come, even after I have tagged them are they still asking to be tagged!
I had a line on my profile explaining that I didn't want my pics tagged by strangers, and I got grief for it!
I tagged my own, but they are still asking to be tagged......come on, play fair.....
Sorry if this has been done to death but this does not make swinging fun for me...
M
xx

You are correct, I was able to tag one of your pictures but I swear I never enjoyed it redface
wave
Wotcha Straighty! :giggle:
*goes to peek at Sexy's pics!*
Quote by Dirtygirly
wave
Wotcha Straighty! :giggle:
*goes to peek at Sexy's pics!*

Ello DG kiss
I am cursing you right now rolleyes
Quote by Dawnie

wave
Wotcha Straighty! :giggle:
*goes to peek at Sexy's pics!*

Ello DG kiss
I am cursing you right now rolleyes
Me? :shock:
What did I do this time?
Whatever it was... it was all your fault! :mrgreen:
Quote by Dirtygirly

wave
Wotcha Straighty! :giggle:
*goes to peek at Sexy's pics!*

Ello DG kiss
I am cursing you right now rolleyes
Me? :shock:
What did I do this time?
Whatever it was... it was all your fault! :mrgreen:
No, this was very much your fault mad
All will become clear in another thread :roll:
You can be quite scary sometimes!! :scared:
:giggle:
Quote by Dirtygirly
You can be quite scary sometimes!! :scared:
:giggle:

I know whip
Don't worry, I am a pussy cat really redface
So aside from the moderator love-in lol would Admin care to comment on mexy's observation, i.e. that once pics have been self-tagged, they can still be modified by other viewers?
PS Mex, I tagged yours, whisper sweet nothings in the chat room and I mayv even let you know what I chose passionkiss
Have we solved it yet,,,,,,,,,,,, rolleyes
Nope rolleyes
Quote by swcpl2005
So aside from the moderator love-in lol would Admin care to comment on mexy's observation, i.e. that once pics have been self-tagged, they can still be modified by other viewers?
PS Mex, I tagged yours, whisper sweet nothings in the chat room and I mayv even let you know what I chose passionkiss

my guess is you CAN tag them, but it won't have any bearing on the pics, as the "self tag" still will trump whatever you've tagged them as.
it still doesn't solve the problem, as it still means "more work" for whoever feels like tagging pics other than one's own.
Quote by Dirtygirly
Sorry to rant, but how come, even after I have tagged them are they still asking to be tagged!
I had a line on my profile explaining that I didn't want my pics tagged by strangers, and I got grief for it!
I tagged my own, but they are still asking to be tagged......come on, play fair.....
Sorry if this has been done to death but this does not make swinging fun for me...
M
xx

You are correct, I was able to tag one of your pictures but I swear I never enjoyed it redface
wave
Wotcha Straighty! :giggle:
*goes to peek at Sexy's pics!*
Is it just me, or is it hot in here?? wink
Quote by swcpl2005
So aside from the moderator love-in lol would Admin care to comment on mexy's observation, i.e. that once pics have been self-tagged, they can still be modified by other viewers?
PS Mex, I tagged yours, whisper sweet nothings in the chat room and I mayv even let you know what I chose passionkiss

Mmmmmmm Mr Lycra Sw........... redface
I don't even know how to whisper....
So I see we still haven't solved the problem....kinda like sound in chat....