Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Termination?

last reply
87 replies
4.1k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Ok I've sort of been thinking how to go about starting this topic as its a bit contentious and emotive so i think i'll just be blunt.
Does the male half of a couple have any rights in the issue of abortion? I being a man think they do. I understand that it's a womans body but it has effects on the male half as well.
Personally I believe the male does have some say in the future of the unborn..
The legal stance on this:
Abortion and Men
'Fathers have no legal rights over their unborn children. The choice to continue with a pregnancy or have an abortion lies solely with the mother. While women can legally choose to abnegate their parental rights and responsibilities, men cannot.'
Morally, well thats a whole different story.
Abortion is a hugely debateable subject, one for which there isn't a right or wrong answer, imo.
Legally when a child is born "Fathers do not have an absolute obligation to provide for the welfare of their children" - so do they have the same right before the child is born?
Taken from a website against abortion....
"But for every abortion there is also a third victim that gets overlooked most of the time. That victim is the father of the aborted child. Now I know that this isn’t the politically correct approach, since modern feminists insist that abortion is all about the mother’s body, her feelings and her choices. But I think we need to acknowledge that those potential fathers-to-be may have feelings, too."
On the flip side it must be one hell of a decision on the woman's part to go for an abortion without her partner knowing, that is a very lonely experience one that probably hasn't been taken lightly.
So at the end of the day, HelnHeaven's right, it really does come down to morals.
Excellant subject to receive loads of views on Lost! :thumbup:
:crazy: It's way too early......but.....
I wholeheartedly believe that fathers should have the same rights as mothers where children are concerned. However, whilst fathers should, of course have a say- at least certainly a right to know- when it comes to abortion, the issue is complex.
If Dad wants the baby, and mum does not-
yes,he may well offer to take on the upbringing of that child alone. However, mum will also be responsible for supporting that child financially to some extent.
Mum's body will also have changed irrevocably in the meantime.
If mum wants the baby, and Dad does not-
The reverse of point one obviously applies.
As far as point two goes, it's her body to make the decision about.
Flipping viewpoints again........
Should "not getting saggy bits" be a justifiable reason to end a human life? No.
Should the financial aspect not be thought through before the pants come down? Obviously.
Just playing devils advocate here, and throwing out a few of my thoughts. And before I get jumped on by people saying "we used contraception and it failed", been there, done that-three times, so I'm not preaching.
(And that doesn't even include my first pregnancy, when I was using the "it won't happen to me" method of contraception....innocent)
Quote by Mallock2006
Personally I believe the male does have some say in the future of the unborn..

How far does that some say go though? dunno Not very far if the women really doesnt want to have the baby.
In an ideal world it would be a choice that both parents would make together. Although, theres many reasons ( some listed above by Winchwench) that women have abortions. Ultimately, having a baby does affect a women much more than a man, which is why the choice is left to the women. However wrong or right that may be.
I personally believe that a man should have a say, but then again, should a woman be forced into having a child if she really doesnt want to. :dunno:
Its a subject where I dont quite know where I stand on it confused
Louise xx
An emotive subject indeed.
I'm 39, I've never wanted children and thus far I've been fortunate in not having to be in the possition of having to make this choice. If I were to fall pregnant I would have always been sure that I wouldn't want to keep it, as I say I haven't had to test that as yet. But if I were in that possition would the father have the right to make me keep a child I didn't plan and never wanted? In my view there are too many unwanted and unloved children in the world already, other people may consider my view to be selfish, that's thier prerogative, but it's my choice.
Oh and I wouldn't be choosing not to have 'saggy bits', I have those already sad
H.x
ok here goes,
i was 17 at the time and did some stupid things, one was have unprotected sex, the outcome was i got pregnant!!
first thoughts was OH SHIT what will my mum say. and she kind of surprised me, she was great. second thoughts were what do i do now. again mum came to the rescue and i got myself checked out. next came the decision process, do i keep it or not.
it was the hardest thing i have ever had to decided, even over 20 years later i wonder how i came to the decision. but my main reason for doing what i did was i was too young to cope and i wouldnt have had the opertunities later in life if i had been 'tied down' by a child. (wrong reasons perhaps but they were mine and i 'will' not justify them to anyone)
i have regrets still about having a termination but i also know it was the right choice for me.
the father never was in the discution as he had done a runner so i wouldnt have had even financial help from him let alone support, i dont blame him in any way we was both young and foolish at the time. but he would have been included in all discutions if he had been around. but i realy doubt that if he had wanted the child and i didnt that i would have had the child and let him bring the child up without any input from me.
people who have to make this decision no matter on the outcome have my utmost sympathy and respect. and because of my experience friends feel they can come and talk to me openly about their fears without being preached at, as they feel a family member would.
also to throw somthing into the mix do potential grandparents have a say in what happens
Sara, you shouldn't have to justify your actions to anyone - as you say, no support from the father meant that you would have been the person taking the responsibility.
I'm not sure where I sit on this matter though really. I do think that there are some arguments (very strong ones)and circumstances when termination is acceptable (such as victims - and that is only one example, not the only one). However, I also think that termination is unacceptable in some circumstances (for example, when used as a form of birth control, after the fact).
I've never been in a position where I've had to even consider termination so some might say (and rightly so) that I don't know how I'd feel. I just don't think I could go through with a termination.
However, I don't think it's up to the man to decide whether the woman does it. It's not his body. Putting aside the notion of moral/emotional/financial support, that leaves it down to whose body is going to bear the ravages of pregnancy and birth (and after?). I don't think there's any way that a man can empathise with, or understand that. Insisting on the pregnancy going to term just because he's fathered the baby isn't a strong enough reason. In my opinion.
Oh and Sara, no - it's bugger all to do with grandparents.
there are men out there who do no want children yet if a woman becomes pregnant and the man chooses not to have anything to do with the child then the man is eventually forced into having something to do with the child through maintance.
If a man chooses this path should he be made to pay for something he didnt want?
Quote by tina1
there are men out there who do no want children yet if a woman becomes pregnant and the man chooses not to have anything to do with the child then the man is eventually forced into having something to do with the child through maintance.
If a man chooses this path should he be made to pay for something he didnt want?

If the man were to take control of contaceptive in this case then it would negate the need for any responsibility from him as pregnancy would be extremely unlikely to happen.
Quote by firelizard
there are men out there who do no want children yet if a woman becomes pregnant and the man chooses not to have anything to do with the child then the man is eventually forced into having something to do with the child through maintance.
If a man chooses this path should he be made to pay for something he didnt want?

If the man were to take control of contaceptive in this case then it would negate the need for any responsibility from him as pregnancy would be extremely unlikely to happen.
how many men do you know to remember to take a weeks course of antibiotics etc. without forgetting at least 1 .... and you think they would remember a lifetime of taking somthing like the pill rolleyes
if men were to be the ones to be pregnant instead of or as well as women a different matter entirley till that happens would you trust that a 'stranger' was taking precautions that you can not tell visualy they are using.
by stranger i mean not your partner.
Quote by Sara_2006
there are men out there who do no want children yet if a woman becomes pregnant and the man chooses not to have anything to do with the child then the man is eventually forced into having something to do with the child through maintance.
If a man chooses this path should he be made to pay for something he didnt want?

If the man were to take control of contaceptive in this case then it would negate the need for any responsibility from him as pregnancy would be extremely unlikely to happen.
how many men do you know to remember to take a weeks course of antibiotics etc. without forgetting at least 1 .... and you think they would remember a lifetime of taking somthing like the pill rolleyes
if men were to be the ones to be pregnant instead of or as well as women a different matter entirley till that happens would you trust that a 'stranger' was taking precautions that you can not tell visualy they are using.
by stranger i mean not your partner.
I have highlighted the part of the post I was answering. Surely if a man is adamantly against having or taking responsibility for any children he sires then he should take the responsibility that this does not happen to him. I was actually refering to condoms rather than the pill though wink
Also I was thinking that lost was refering to partners rather than strangers for this post, but if he is refering to strangers then again condoms would normally be used anyway.
Love
Fire xx
Quote by Sara_2006
how many men do you know to remember to take a weeks course of antibiotics etc. without forgetting at least 1 .... and you think they would remember a lifetime of taking somthing like the pill rolleyes

>slight hijack< Gosh, this really gets my goat....men aren't some kind of second class species. They are just as able to remember anything as women are. How come it is o.k. to patronise men but if men were to patronise women in a public thread (however 'humourously')they would be leapt on from a great height. mad :x >hijack over<
splendid
as for the subject of the thread I am gathering my opinion into a readable post.
Quote by splendid_

how many men do you know to remember to take a weeks course of antibiotics etc. without forgetting at least 1 .... and you think they would remember a lifetime of taking somthing like the pill rolleyes

>slight hijack< Gosh, this really gets my goat....men aren't some kind of second class species. They are just as able to remember anything as women are. How come it is o.k. to patronise men but if men were to patronise women in a public thread (however 'humourously')they would be leapt on from a great height. mad :x >hijack over<
splendid
as for the subject of the thread I am gathering my opinion into a readable post.
i didnt mean to be patronising, well not much anyway, i have the same memory problems and therefore chose a different method of contreception than having to remember to take somthing.......
there are various methods as we are i am sure aware of and if, as has been mentioned earlier, you are adiment that you dont want to be a parent then take every possable course of action you can to try to prevent a possible pregnancy but as we are also aware nothing is 100% effective other than abstinance.
and as far as the original post is concerned then if he did mean in a partnership then the male would be around to discuss things with and a joint decision is the only reasonable course of action ... i was giving my account of my experience and that didnt really include the male as he wasnt around.
The first is it is extremely sexist to imaginine ALL rapes are perpetrated by Men

Yes but it would be very difficult for a woman by a woman, or a man by a woman to fall pregnant.
Yes, it should be an equal decission, but all to often the decission of one side affects the lives of both. For example a couple, neither of whom want children, she falls pregnant despite precautions (pill and condom) and she decides to keep the baby despite having previously said she didn't want any. He is now a father and has the responsibilities of one because a decission was taken for him. Is that fair?
H.x
Quote by Sara_2006

how many men do you know to remember to take a weeks course of antibiotics etc. without forgetting at least 1 .... and you think they would remember a lifetime of taking somthing like the pill rolleyes

>slight hijack< Gosh, this really gets my goat....men aren't some kind of second class species. They are just as able to remember anything as women are. How come it is o.k. to patronise men but if men were to patronise women in a public thread (however 'humourously')they would be leapt on from a great height. mad :x >hijack over<
splendid
as for the subject of the thread I am gathering my opinion into a readable post.
i didnt mean to be patronising, well not much anyway, i have the same memory problems and therefore chose a different method of contreception than having to remember to take somthing.......
there are various methods as we are i am sure aware of and if, as has been mentioned earlier, you are adiment that you dont want to be a parent then take every possable course of action you can to try to prevent a possible pregnancy but as we are also aware nothing is 100% effective other than abstinance.
and as far as the original post is concerned then if he did mean in a partnership then the male would be around to discuss things with and a joint decision is the only reasonable course of action ... i was giving my account of my experience and that didnt really include the male as he wasnt around.
So going back to the point I was answering which was should the father be made to be responsible and assuming he has done everything in his power to prevent said pregnancy then to be honest, I don't really know. It takes two to make a pregnancy whether it's wanted or not and as stated accidents can and do happen so my natural train of thought says yes he should be half responsible as should the person carrying the child also be.
I suppose the only way for a man to be sure he is not held responsible for his child is to say NO wink or take the consequences if that 1% mistake happens.
After discussion in my office.
Everyone (men and women) decided that as the law is black and white. The answer is no, the man has no right. It is the woman's body and the man could be sentencing her to ill health death etc as childbirth is a risky business.
If we took the law out of it.. then the answers were ' depends on the circumstances' 'are the couple married?' 'why is the man not using a condom' 'if he used a condom he would have control over whether he got anyone pregnant' 'did they plan 'the baby' together?' 'how far along is she?'
basically we couldn't reach a consensus... and were thankful we weren't making a new law.
splendid
p.s. I had to ask my colleagues as my brain was melting with the complexities.
Quote by de_sade
:shock:
Contentious stuff indeed, and Lost appears to have quickly departed too...Hmmmmm. :uhoh:
...

Hey I just come in from college and its the first time I've had chance to look at forum. smile
For what it's worth so far I happen to totally agree with everything you say de_sade. I do have more to say on this and interested in the views expressed.
Initially I think at this point that I take only a slight issue with it takes two to tango. I think that's boll*x. I'm sure there are mistakes etc but I feel that if it was my body and the possible ravages and changes that a pregnancy would force upon it. Then i would make as sure as goddamn possible that I would be as safe from the possibility of pregnancy as possible.
In the end a person takes responsibility for their own body and as such its a womans duty to herself to do this. I understand that there are times that 'accidents' happen - but excuse the skeptic in me a lot of the time it aint an accident. it's stupidity or an ulterior motive.
As to the accidents that are accidents I truly think in that case pregnancy is I live opposite - ish a woman who has had three accidents out of five. excuse me for being suspicious.
This is totally off topic i'm sorry but to that i will formulate my ideas and post later.
what if a guy is part of a loving relationship (or at least he thinks he is) and his partner views it as an insult if he feels the need to wear a condom? what if he trusts her enough to take the pill regularly yet she sits him down one day and admits to deliberately not taking the precautions but still continuing to have sex without telling him?
It happened to me, an ex told me she was pregnant even though i used to remind her to take her pill and i used to keep an eye on how many she had in the packet. She was obviuosly just binning them on a daily basis or something.
reality is no man has any say in whether its time to be a father, because the women can always decieve to get a bigger council house etc.
Then to rub salt in the wound If the guys name isnt on the birth certificate he might as well not exist.
Quote by de_sade
what if a guy is part of a loving relationship (or at least he thinks he is) and his partner views it as an insult if he feels the need to wear a condom? what if he trusts her enough to take the pill regularly yet she sits him down one day and admits to deliberately not taking the precautions but still continuing to have sex without telling him?
It happened to me, an ex told me she was pregnant even though i used to remind her to take her pill and i used to keep an eye on how many she had in the packet. She was obviuosly just binning them on a daily basis or something.
reality is no man has any say in whether its time to be a father, because the women can always decieve to get a bigger council house etc.
Then to rub salt in the wound If the guys name isnt on the birth certificate he might as well not exist.

There is some incongruence in your post easyease. You say you trusted her enough to take the pill, but then you say you used to keep an eye on how many she had in the packet
Perhaps there was something about her behaviour that made you suspicious. dunno
Not sure. :dunno:
But I think this story could be echoed across the country and not just by men who were misled by their partners (male or female) into imagining they were safer than they actually were.
Or perhaps he was just checking that she hadn't forgotten? :dunno:
hmmmm im trusting type of guy and at the time didnt think i was stupid. I made it clear to her i wasnt ready for fatherhood and wanted to share the responsibility of contraception even though i wasnt the one actually taking the pill. my point is the choice is never down to the man.
I have just been asked (rather sarcastically) what happens in the case of pregnancy as a result of a crime - say for example, ?

Sorry De-sade, yes you're right, not all is by men, I was mearly pointing out that for an unwanted pregnancy to result from a crime, eg. the protaganist would have to be male and the victim would have to be female.
No, but neither would it have been fair if the biological father had insisted she had a termination.

Equally true, but suggesting that the decission is one of 50-50 equality is, in my opinion, not true.
In the end a person takes responsibility for their own body and as such its a womans duty to herself to do this. I understand that there are times that 'accidents' happen - but excuse the skeptic in me a lot of the time it aint an accident. it's stupidity or an ulterior motive.

However Lost's suggesting that the man holds no responsibility at all leaves me a little cold.
H.x
Quote by H-x
However Lost's suggesting that the man holds no responsibility at all leaves me a little cold.
H.x

So would you suggest that its the mans responsibility to look after the womans body too? In the end all i'm suggesting is that a man can only do so much the end results are left with the woman. It's no good willing a woman to not become pregnant but thats of no practical use after all.
Why does it leave you cold that I suggest that women should be aware of their own vulnerability in this issue and be prepared to take whatever it takes to avoid the issue. Surely thats empowerment?
I certainly tell my daughter that in her future these sorts of issues that its her responsibility and she owes it to herself to think of these things independantly of a partner.
My sons will be told the same things. To respect others and to think and protect 'themselves' rather than leave it to others to make those decisions. it is a responsibilty that cannot be wholly on themselves.
Interesting topic Lost :thumbup: .
Even though legally I know that men don`t have a right as to wether a lady terminates a pregnancy or not, morally its another question entirely.
In an ideal world it would be a joint decision but unfortunatly we don`t live in an ideal world.
Its the females mind and body that has to go through pregnancy and birth and any woman will tell you it can be a rollacoaster of emotions. Its tough being pregnant and I would imagine a female being forced to go ahead with a pregnancy because of a court order (I don`t know if it would ever happen but just trying to imagine if it did) could end up mentaly scared and possibly even try to harm herself and the unborn child. Possibly trying to self abort in extream circumstances. Should that be allowed because another person has wanted the child?.
I would feel desparetly sad for any male who has really wanted the child but their wife/partner/whatever has decided terminate. But I would feel equally sad if the male didn`t want the baby and the female did.
Unfortunatly tho I think the final decision has to lie with the female although I would hope she would discuss and consider the males feelings before making any final decisions.
I guess tho its never a black and white subject and I don`t believe (most) women take the decision lightly.
Quote by Lost
[
Why does it leave you cold that I suggest that women should be aware of their own vulnerability in this issue and be prepared to take whatever it takes to avoid the issue. Surely thats empowerment?

No, what left me cold was your inference that contraception was the sole responsibility of the woman.
H.x
Quote by Lost

Initially I think at this point that I take only a slight issue with it takes two to tango. I think that's boll*x. I'm sure there are mistakes etc but I feel that if it was my body and the possible ravages and changes that a pregnancy would force upon it. Then i would make as sure as goddamn possible that I would be as safe from the possibility of pregnancy as possible.

I have to ask here Lost, why it doesn't take two to tango ? What if a woman, who was completely aware of the "ravages" and "changes" of pregnancy, took 'complete' precautions (eg the Pill injection) would that make it ok for a trusted male sexual partner not to use a condom ?
Quote by Lost

In the end a person takes responsibility for their own body and as such its a womans duty to herself to do this. I understand that there are times that 'accidents' happen - but excuse the skeptic in me a lot of the time it aint an accident. it's stupidity or an ulterior motive.

Ultimately, a person takes responsibility for their own actions and as such it's a females' and males' duty to do this. Sometimes pregnancy is an accident.
Quote by Lost

As to the accidents that are accidents I truly think in that case pregnancy is unfortunate.

So what are your views on abortion-let's call it what it really is eh?- when the female who, despite taking all the precautions she can gets pregnant by the male (non-partner) who took no precautions (eg condoms make it feel crap). The female in question may not want any more children and so took precautions against it, the male in question has never wanted any children but took no precautions. The female, now pregnant, doesn't believe in abortion as a form of birth control, the male not wanting children demands it. Whose choice is it?
Without knowing the background/history to each case, its hard to give a general opinion.
But I personally believe the decision should be with the female aided by counciling from an impartial proffesional person.
LG
Quote by easyease
what if a guy is part of a loving relationship (or at least he thinks he is) and his partner views it as an insult if he feels the need to wear a condom? what if he trusts her enough to take the pill regularly yet she sits him down one day and admits to deliberately not taking the precautions but still continuing to have sex without telling him?
It happened to me, an ex told me she was pregnant even though i used to remind her to take her pill and i used to keep an eye on how many she had in the packet. She was obviuosly just binning them on a daily basis or something.
reality is no man has any say in whether its time to be a father, because the women can always decieve to get a bigger council house etc.
Then to rub salt in the wound If the guys name isnt on the birth certificate he might as well not exist.

Have I got this right.....you trusted her to take the pill but you checked the packet and knew she wasnt taking it and you impregnated her???
This been the case why did you not use contraception?
Apologises if I have read your post wrong its late confused
Many years ago I thought I was pregnant, and was trying to say to my husband. I think I might be pregnant.
Couldn’t say it to him and he just said what’s the matter hun u preggies or what ?
When i said i might be, he said ok lets be parents, and this is a guy who didn't want kids, and was part of the agreement when we got married.. And before anyone says well its your choice. (he said lets call it a day if u want kids before we even thought of getting hitched), but he just said it's happened.
And yes he said it's your body do what u think is right, but I don't believe in abortion and will stand by u no matter what.
But the end of the day it is the woman who will end up looking after and loving the child in the good times and the bad times, so i cannot give a answer to the question as it is to hard to give an unbias answer as a woman, but would always say u should tell the other half and find a common ground on what is best for all