Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
JandJ
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 58
Bisexual Female, 55
0 miles · Hereford and Worcester
Forum
anyone any ideas ?Quote by fabio
one does wonder....how it stands on the sex discrimination act....... are you actually allowed to charge more for a single male..than a single female ?
Now then..who is going to take the test case ? :shock:
I think it would stand up I think because all clubs are private members clubs... and I am sure those are exempt..
being a private club does not exempt anywhere from the various discrimination legislation (otherwise teh BNP could happily state "no blacks") ... I suspect that a lot of clubs operate these policies in the knowledge that no-one will complain to the authorities ....
... is she loves pictures in porn, of guys who are semi-erect. Either getting there, or having just cum, and losing their erections. Especially if theres a shot of a girl holding the guy too.
She remembers a few films from the past where you saw a guy get hard, cum and lose his erection on film, but can't remember any titles now ...
Is this a shared fetish, or will she have to suffer alone
: Does anyone know of any pics/films that might cater for her 
:
She remembers a few films from the past where you saw a guy get hard, cum and lose his erection on film, but can't remember any titles now ...
Is this a shared fetish, or will she have to suffer alone
: Does anyone know of any pics/films that might cater for her : The "funniest" thing is that over 90% of child-abuse takes place in the home, by close family ... this ludicrous tabloid peedofilya scare where they try and convince you there's a behind every bush is not only hysterical, it's downright dishonest. In fact it's actually dangerous, as it's inadvertantly persuading people that paedophiles *only* lurk behind bushes in parks.
Hi guys,
been searching for a few obscure titles from our youth, and wondered if anyone here knew of a (probably off-net, as we have scoured online resources) source of older (c early 80s) UK based porn mags. In particular looking for copies of "Nighbirds" and "Whiteheat" which were rivals to the David Sullivan titles for a few months.
thanks in advance
JnJ
been searching for a few obscure titles from our youth, and wondered if anyone here knew of a (probably off-net, as we have scoured online resources) source of older (c early 80s) UK based porn mags. In particular looking for copies of "Nighbirds" and "Whiteheat" which were rivals to the David Sullivan titles for a few months.
thanks in advance
JnJ
I'm forced to use Vista at work, and have decided that after XP at home, I'm going to Linux. I really, really would advise you to get a "downgrade" license to XP, and install that. (Basically it's using your existing Vista License to cover removing Vista and going back to XP).
Don't ask anyone at PC world - they've been programmed to insist you can only have Vista.
Otherwise I wish you well as you discover more about PC support than you ever wanted to know.
Don't ask anyone at PC world - they've been programmed to insist you can only have Vista.
Otherwise I wish you well as you discover more about PC support than you ever wanted to know.
Quote by Cherrytree
I don't give a monkey's.
I don't visit any site, or make any text or email that is illegal.
And if measures like this could prevent future terrorism, fine by me.
However - if I'm being naive, maybe someone would like to enlighten me.
So you are perfectly happy that a future government will not make anything you like to do illegal ? That's very trusting. I suggest you read about the 1933 census in Germany which asked householders to list everyones religion. There was little outcry - after all, people had nothing to hide. How do you think the Nazis managed to round up so many Jews so quickly.
It's not what they are planning to do, which scares me. It's what they could do.
Oh, and I hope you have no pictures in your internet browsers cache of anyone who looks under 18 in a provocative pose, coz then you're already illegal, mate.
Quote by H-x
I haven't seen either film but after reading up on them, both seem worth a view. It's crazy that films depicting gore are deamed less harmful.
So, if I understand you correctly, this law is in place until people with a bit more common sense can over-ride it in the European courts? How screwed up is that?
H.x
It's part of the nuLab way of doing things. Media kick up a stink. Government rush in with tough "laws" (ignoring anyone who tries to speak sense) and then see the laws struck out by either Europe, or the House of Lords (or both, if they're being really stubborn.)
Don't believe me ? Asylum seekers ? Terrorist control orders? Assets seizing laws ? Home Secretary deciding life prisoners parole eligibility ?
Wait till they start the rumour that "terrorists" are into "wife swapping" as an excuse to seize the swinging heaven servers and subscription list.
If they haven't already, that is.
Quote by H-x
What would be classed as 'extreme'? I can understand child porn, but what else comes under th heading?
H.x
whatever they want to. Note : Even a previously BBFC certified film *could* be classed as "extreme".
Ever since the obscene publications act became neutered, due to European precedence, HMG has been itching for a way to stick their morality down the throats of the Great British public. (Not for nothing does the word "dour" and "puritan" follow Gordon Brown around).
One of the absolute touchstones of any law is that you must be able to know in advance whether you are breaking it or not. The OPA failed that miserably, and I suspect this law will too, and be thrown out when it gets appealed to the European Court of Justice. However in the meantime, spare a thought for the people who will lose their liberty, jobs, famlies, and in some cases lives, when the police decide to charge them with possession of extreme pornography after finding a copy of "In the realm of the senses" or "Straw dogs" in their video collection.
Quote by
... fingerprints, involves comparing points from the sample if I recall correctly, 10 usually, although I have heard of 6 being used.
...
The full set of finger prints are stored. By reducing the finger print to a plot of divisions and swirls (clockwise and anti-clockwise) it is possible to conduct a computer search. Once a print or a small set of prints have been selected the final confirmation is made by a human using the actual print. There would be little point in only holding part of a print as no one knows which part will be found!
Different courts require a different number of points as a minimum. Perhaps this is where you get the numbers 10 and 6 from.
Travis
I know a hash is used to index the database. However my point still stands. If you put 100 potential matches which have to be manually checked, where there were 5, even 10 before, then you have placed an intolerable strain on the system. Well, intolerable if you actually care about geting the right person. I'm sure once our Lords and Masters realise how much more difficult it will be to secure a conviction (that pesky "reasonable doubt") they'll probably decide that being innocent is no defence in law.
Fingerprints, DNA, ID cards, are all part of a system. By concentrating on those already convicted, historically we have managed to keep the signal to noise ratio quite low, and the systems have worked. Once the S/N ratio passes a certain threshold, the system becomes useless.
Where I work, we lose a few important emails, because the spam filters have to be set quite high. If they weren't, people would get 100+ emails a day, and we'd grind to a halt. Putting everyone in the database is teh equivalent of turning the spam filter off.
Quote by
So a woman comes out of a pub. She is pulled into the bushes beaten and , may be killed. The man has left DNA. The DNA is tested.
...
Or do we check it against a full data base of British subjects and visitors to the country, pick the man up inside a day and stop him from doing it fro the next who knows how long.
Travis
DNA testing, like fingerprints, involves comparing points from the sample if I recall correctly, 10 usually, although I have heard of 6 being used.
When a persons DNA is held in the database, it's these points which are stored - not the whole sequence, which is UNIMAGINATIVELY big. The more samples you store, the greater the chance of a match. So, lets fast forward to your utopian Britain, shall we ....
DNA from crime scene is compared with full UK database (60 million records) ...
10 match
1 is dead
2 are abroad
2 cannot be found
1 is not the person the database says they are
3 cannot account for there whereabouts
1 is 2 months old
so the police have to try and trace 10 people and (presumably, but not neccesarily) eliminate 9 from their enquiries.
Quite apart from the extra legwork this involves (luckily teh UK police have never, ever been tempted to manufacture a case against a suspect to save work), by the time the whole case comes to court, even a paralegal secretary could say the words "reasonable doubt" and gain an acquittal.
Considering the government has access to some of the best scientists in the world, it's curious they don't actually listen to them. (In private. Publicly most scientists say what the government wants them to, or risk losing their funding).
incidentally, no-one has ever PROVED fingerprints are unique. It's just accepted that given a small control database (i.e. only convicted criminals) then the chances of a match to an unknown are so small that it must have been the person in question. As soon as you start to build a MONSTER control database (i.e the whole population) then the risks of an identical fingerprint being found rise.
I have this vague picture of a future where fingerprints are much less use because the UK government managed to stumble on a case where two fingerprints could not be told apart. I wonder how popular we'd be with the rest of the world then ?
Quote by Dave__Notts
Off on one of my rambles now, so just skip this post
Alcohol worse than Heroin? It could be and it depends on the society at that time in history.
Also in the 50's, as someone else pointed out, this country had a medicine that was based on herion......it think it was called Lourdinum or something like that. Dave_Notts
Laudanum
it's opium in alcohol ! *Very* popular in Victorian times
Quote by Mallock2006
Alcohol - worse than heroin?
But, heroin is highly addictive, I've never tried it and have no intention to, but from what I've read, try it once and you are hooked, so in my opinion it is this that makes it more dangerous than alchohol.
Quote by JandJ
Not true.
Says who
Someone who had to nurse their fiance through a crippling back injury that only responded to diamorphine. I can certainly tell you that "try it once and you're hooked" is somewhat wide of the mark.
Use it carefully, and you won't get hooked. That was what the doctor told us when we were refusing to use it because of the connotations. In the end the pain was so bad we had no choice. Luckily the diamorphine helped ease the pain enough for the injury to start to heal and my fiance was weaned off quite quickly.
If you want to know about addictive drugs, look at benzodiazepeines (of which Valium is one). They really are addictive. And, unlike heroin, there is no accepted withdrawal protocol. Once you're on them, you're on them for good.
Quote by st3v3
Alcohol - worse than heroin?
But, heroin is highly addictive, I've never tried it and have no intention to, but from what I've read, try it once and you are hooked, so in my opinion it is this that makes it more dangerous than alchohol.
Not true.
The fact that more people get hooked on alchohol than heroin does not make it worse, its probably easier to give up alchohol than heroin in most cases.
In the 1950s, when you could buy heroin, morphine, cannabis, cocaine, and any other drug you wanted from a chemist, with no prescription, the Met Polices "drugs squad" was 2 officers. And people who used heroin were quite capable of working for a living - you'd never know they used, unless they told you.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating anyone take anything (being a father means a responsible POV). However IMHO ignorance is worse than knowledge.
Interested to read your views. I'll just butt in to say that banning things, or trying to tax them off the streets hasn't really been a success so far has it ?
Tax away - I can brew whatever beer I like, or make whatever wine I like from fruit juice, yeast and sugar. Distilling isn't too difficult either, if you can read.
It always strikes me as A about T to treat the inert substance as the problem - maybe we should take a good look at our society, and try and fix that. There are loads of other countries that have just as much access to alcohol as we do, and they don't have anywhere near the issues we do.
Do you think there may be a whisper of a clue in there ?
Tax away - I can brew whatever beer I like, or make whatever wine I like from fruit juice, yeast and sugar. Distilling isn't too difficult either, if you can read.
It always strikes me as A about T to treat the inert substance as the problem - maybe we should take a good look at our society, and try and fix that. There are loads of other countries that have just as much access to alcohol as we do, and they don't have anywhere near the issues we do.
Do you think there may be a whisper of a clue in there ?
Hi all
we've been past a site in Clent, which we have heard as being a "lovers car park". We've finally decided we'd like to see what's going on - and maybe more depending how things go.
Are there any Midlands ettiquette we need to be aware of ? Can anyone comment on the area (by PM obviously) ?
I don't want to say to much more, as I have lurked long enough to know what happens if too much is said ....
Thanks in advance
we've been past a site in Clent, which we have heard as being a "lovers car park". We've finally decided we'd like to see what's going on - and maybe more depending how things go.
Are there any Midlands ettiquette we need to be aware of ? Can anyone comment on the area (by PM obviously) ?
I don't want to say to much more, as I have lurked long enough to know what happens if too much is said ....
Thanks in advance
