Quote by Choochie
sorry Kels weather too iffy to risk it - next time honey
How do you know what the weather will be in three weeks?
Never mind the lottery, get down to Ladbrokes!
L xxx
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Lonni
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 63
0 miles · England
Forum
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 
Quote by Dave__Notts
I am a bit puzzled why people are refering to a CRB in this instance.
Dave_Notts
Me too. I can't see the connection hence the ???
Taking unsanctioned leave from work is not a criminal offence but you can still be sacked for it.
I personally know two people (one in health, one in education) who have been disciplined and one dismissed for being involved in swinging.
Saying 'it's a bit harsh' is neither here nor there. No chief executive wants to wake up one Sunday morning to a NoTW 'exclusive' about swinging in his/her social services dept. It's years since I worked for anyone other than myself but if you look at most contracts now, an employer can get rid, for pretty much any reason now.
L x
Quote by Crashnnix
1. This is not an illegal activity
2. If someone did use the pics they will reveal their identity on here
3. See 2 - they would be open to litigation
4. blackmail or threats of any kind constitutes a crime
5. Swinging is not a crime - it is a lifestyle
6. We dont give a crap lol - my boss would piss himself laughing and say 'fair play - how does he join?' lol
7. We would be famous for 15 minutes - see Warhol-A
So no need to be paranoid - be a proud swinger!! :happy:
Not quite!
There are a number of occupations particularly in health, education and social sevices, where an employee can be disciplined or even dismissed for being a member of this site. This is not paranoia, it is a reality for a number of people on here.
Lonni xxx :cry:
Quote by fabio
leaving the organisor out of pocket.....
As Ahabs has rightly pointed out, the way round this is to charge a nominal fee to cover costs.
Work out what costs need covering then only stick someone's name down as confirmed when they have sent the money IN ADVANCE!
You may need to 'frighten' people a couple of weeks before, with 'this event is not going to happen' unless X amount of people who have expressed an interest send their money in now!
This usually works and the money starts to flow in, but it is annoying to put all that time and effort into organising something and only know a couple of weeks beforehand if it is going to happen.
Lonni x
Doesn't the year fly by?
The crocuses are out, birds have started nesting and we have the first 'hard done by single bloke' thread on the forum.
I used to be really good at helping people out and pointing them in the right direction, but now I can't be arsed.
Maybe it's an age thing?
Just try harder mate and realise the odds are really stacked against you but if you keep at it you may get somewhere.
L xxx
The crocuses are out, birds have started nesting and we have the first 'hard done by single bloke' thread on the forum.
I used to be really good at helping people out and pointing them in the right direction, but now I can't be arsed.
Maybe it's an age thing?
Just try harder mate and realise the odds are really stacked against you but if you keep at it you may get somewhere.
L xxx
Quote by Dave__Notts
Underground naming and shaming works without having to go public. If someone is an arse it gets around anyway.
Dave_Notts
Not true! I know two people on here (one male, one female) who have both now left the site because of all the (untrue) shit that was whispered about them, initiated by just one person who had been given a knock back by one of the parties.
john x
: Quote by Dave__Notts
So you have a falling out with one person on here Lonni.
Their friends then set up ficticious meets and state that Lonni never turned up and is unreliable.
How are you going to counter argue that? Especially if all their friends are couples or single fems.......since a lot of single men will believe anything they are told as long as it will get them a shag.
Dave_Notts
I have already answered that in my original post. Look at the numbers. If one person gives me a really bad rep. and tons of others give me glowing praise, anyone looking would go "Hmm. I wonder what is going on here!", and possibly even contact me to find out, whereupon I have the opportunity to tell them about the mad, stalking woman from Huff on the Hill who fell out with me really badly when I refused to marry her and move to Switzerland.
Of course, that's not to say that a determined person with multiple logins and lots of unscrupulous friends couldn't make things difficult for someone on here but would anyone really be that arsed?
L xxx
Quote by kentswingers777
Maybe the powers that be, do not want others to see zillions of members not been online for months and months. Would sort of make the members figures seem a tad over rated perhaps?
Forever the cynic.
You may be right though. The 'Over two weeks' thing is a step backwards rather than an improvement.
It reminds me of when I first started on here and would sometimes wonder why certain people had not replied to ads/pms etc. I would then re-check their profile and oops! 'Last Online 38 months ago'
If this is supposed to be a site for adverts/arranging meets/whatever with people, we should at least be let know whether someone is actually still using the site or not.
Not good!:cry:
L xxx
Quote by Kazsc
Now here is a suggestion :idea: ......the peeps that initiate a thread could end it with a paragraph on how the meet went. We will al be able to spot the time wasters if this was done.
That is not a bad idea.
I'm not generally in favour of 'name and shame' as it is always open to abuse by those with grudges. But something needs to be done and if the same old names kept appearing as being 'unreliable' then people could draw their own conclusions.
L xxx
