+1
:-)
Warming the Bed
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
The_libertine69
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 55
0 miles · East Sussex
Forum
Warming the Bed
Quote by The_libertine69Oops, slap on wrists for me there!
Welcome!, and looks like you've gone about it the right way, unlike another newbie
Mods edit: link removed - not necessary.
Warming the Bed
Quote by Witchy
I was only thinking this week it must be time for "rear of the year" competition.
Someone call?
:D 
Warming the Bed
Think you've probably already had the answer to this in your other thread - http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/302835.html, specifically this reply....
Kinda sums it up.
Quote by Vickanddave
No wonder. One picture with an expression that would strip paint. Cheer up!
Kinda sums it up.
Warming the Bed
Welcome!, and looks like you've gone about it the right way, unlike another newbie
Mods edit: link removed - not necessary.
Mods edit: link removed - not necessary.
Warming the Bed
Quote by BIoke
PS: it wasn't me who sent mr nice arse the cock sucking PM
lol, I can confirm it wasn't. Yours was the one that said "Can the two of us shag that lovely arse senseless please?"
Warming the Bed
Yep, I saw that thread thanks. Not added my name yet until I know I'll definitely be going/able to make it.
Warming the Bed
Yep, it definitely happened. Either that or I was stoned out of my mind and just dreamt it all!
As said by others, thanks to Natalie for sorting it out and being my first social it was great to meet a bunch of people and put faces to names, as well as faces to naughty profile shots! :lol:
Looking forward to the next one.
As said by others, thanks to Natalie for sorting it out and being my first social it was great to meet a bunch of people and put faces to names, as well as faces to naughty profile shots! :lol:
Looking forward to the next one.
Warming the Bed
Quote by brucie
How do you define 'straight'?
Some guys may well have wondered what it'd be like to be fiddled with/fettled by another guy and that's as far as it gets, not enough of a 'curiosity' that they'd even call themselves curious so they, quite fairly, describe themselves as straight as that's all they are interested in with no desire to deviate.
Before anyone says..... NO!, I haven't just described myself and put the key in the lock in the first stage of opening the closet! :lol:
I'm straight, my profile says straight and none of my ads even hint at anything other than straight so how the hell do I end up getting PMs from a gay male couple asking me if I'd like both of them to suck my cock?! :shock:Which part wasn't quite clear?! :lol: They probably thought that they could turn me with their eloquent way with words! :lol:
So your straight? :dunno:
no, hes just in denial
PMSL, I'm denying everything!! :lol:
Warming the Bed
Quote by SwedishGuy:violin: Poor lamb, you've obviously logged onto the wrong site. You need
Well I have been a member now and I don't get any e-mails no replyes so for that reason I won't renew my membership. WAste of time and money.
Quote by Vickanddave
No wonder. One picture with an expression that would strip paint. Cheer up!
:laughabove:
<goes off to clean wine off monitor!>Quote by SwedishGuy
Well at elast I ahve a pic on my face teh only thing I see is your butt.
And here was me thinking you'd posted an arse pic too.
Quote by mancunian
I've checked the site and all the buttons I can find and I can't find Instant Gratification anywhere
Eh?!, What? FFS, that's just not on. Sheesh. Right that's it, I'm leaving too! <looks for flounce smilie> :lol:
Warming the Bed
Quote by Bluefish2009
So your straight?
:kick:
Quote by Kaznkev
no like they probbly saw that arse and thought what the fuck,worth a try
PMSL. Probably about the truth of it! :lol: In fact now you mention it I've noticed quite a few gay singles profiles having had a gander at mine!
Warming the Bed
How do you define 'straight'?
Some guys may well have wondered what it'd be like to be fiddled with/fettled by another guy and that's as far as it gets, not enough of a 'curiosity' that they'd even call themselves curious so they, quite fairly, describe themselves as straight as that's all they are interested in with no desire to deviate.
Before anyone says..... NO!, I haven't just described myself and put the key in the lock in the first stage of opening the closet! :lol:
I'm straight, my profile says straight and none of my ads even hint at anything other than straight so how the hell do I end up getting PMs from a gay male couple asking me if I'd like both of them to suck my cock?! :shock: Which part wasn't quite clear?! :lol: They probably thought that they could turn me with their eloquent way with words! :lol:
Some guys may well have wondered what it'd be like to be fiddled with/fettled by another guy and that's as far as it gets, not enough of a 'curiosity' that they'd even call themselves curious so they, quite fairly, describe themselves as straight as that's all they are interested in with no desire to deviate.
Before anyone says..... NO!, I haven't just described myself and put the key in the lock in the first stage of opening the closet! :lol:
I'm straight, my profile says straight and none of my ads even hint at anything other than straight so how the hell do I end up getting PMs from a gay male couple asking me if I'd like both of them to suck my cock?! :shock:
Which part wasn't quite clear?! :lol: They probably thought that they could turn me with their eloquent way with words! :lol: 
Warming the Bed
Given your criteria I'd recommend this one -
Needing to upgrade our wireless router, anyone out there recommend a router that has 4 Lans sockets.
Ticks that box and it's Gigabit LAN as well, so faster speeds between PCs on the wired network. Obviously you will need Gigabit cards on your PCs to make use of that.
Range is excellent and signal is robust. It's not the cheapest one out there, but it's a good performer and a damn site better looking if it's sat somewhere where you're looking at it every day. Setup is an absolute dawdle and as you are with Virgin (one of the ISPs that the router is set to automatically set up) you'll be online in literally five (max 10) minutes.
Take it we need to go for the N type.
Worth going for yes, given that one of your laptops has N on it and the G ones won't bring down the speed.
Is the dual band anygood with 5hz radio band + band?
The theory behind that is that it reduces the chances of interference from the plethora of other equipment like cordless phones using the same frequency and other wireless networks. That router is only and I've never seen any issues with it and that's with a good number of other networks around me that I see appear on my laptop.
We don't do any games via internet or x-box at the moment in time maybe.
If you do it will work perfectly well with that. With the latest wireless gaming adapter for the Xbox being N type you'll get a much quicker connection - particularly useful for streaming video etc.
As long as he doesn't use any laptop/equipment that has an card in it. It will still work on the router but will bring down the speed of any g/n devices also connected. I know he hasn't mentioned any b equipment but it was just something worth noting. :-)
Needing to upgrade our wireless router, anyone out there recommend a router that has 4 Lans sockets.
Ticks that box and it's Gigabit LAN as well, so faster speeds between PCs on the wired network. Obviously you will need Gigabit cards on your PCs to make use of that.
Range is excellent and signal is robust. It's not the cheapest one out there, but it's a good performer and a damn site better looking if it's sat somewhere where you're looking at it every day. Setup is an absolute dawdle and as you are with Virgin (one of the ISPs that the router is set to automatically set up) you'll be online in literally five (max 10) minutes.
Take it we need to go for the N type.
Worth going for yes, given that one of your laptops has N on it and the G ones won't bring down the speed.
Is the dual band anygood with 5hz radio band + band?
The theory behind that is that it reduces the chances of interference from the plethora of other equipment like cordless phones using the same frequency and other wireless networks. That router is only and I've never seen any issues with it and that's with a good number of other networks around me that I see appear on my laptop.
We don't do any games via internet or x-box at the moment in time maybe.
If you do it will work perfectly well with that. With the latest wireless gaming adapter for the Xbox being N type you'll get a much quicker connection - particularly useful for streaming video etc.
Quote by Ian
So providing what you buy is backwards compatible then older wifi cards will work with it, it won't be a problem.
As long as he doesn't use any laptop/equipment that has an card in it. It will still work on the router but will bring down the speed of any g/n devices also connected. I know he hasn't mentioned any b equipment but it was just something worth noting. :-)
Warming the Bed
is a horrible, horrible crime that can ruin a woman's life for ever and if a man is found guilty beyond any doubt then they should throw away the keys, chop his balls off to boot or just save us taxpayers a whole pile of money and lock him up in the general population i.e. not segregated of a nice tough prison. They won't last long in there.
However, until that man is found guilty then he should IMO also be offered the full anonymity that the accuser receives. How many cases have we seen where a girl has willingly slept with a guy and then basically regretted it in the morning, or her boyfriend has found out, so she cries ! Or other instances where the accuser is just a vindictive bitch who wants to ruin someone's life. As has been said, mud sticks and it doesn't matter if you're accused but found innocent there are plenty of people who will still see them as guilty but just got away with it, as opposed to actually considering that they were innocent.
There have been cases where the accusations by the girl have been so obviously false and thrown out very quickly in court (why the CPS decided it should have gone to court is another matter though!) but still that poor sod has been named publicly. At least in some, not many, cases of obviously false allegations the girl has been prosecuted for it and the guy fortunately has not had his name smeared or life ruined.
I can't see the reasoning behind that TBH. If a is convicted and then named (as he should be) then that will bring other people forward if they had also suffered at that person's hands. That will bring further trials and if found guilty of the other rapes make sure that the guy won't be getting out for a very long time.
However, if a guy is on trial for A and named beforehand as in the current system then that will make not one iota of difference to the chance of conviction of that trial as the prosecution simply aren't allowed to bring into court the fact that other people have come forward accusing him of - it's simply not allowed. Those other cases would need to be tried on a separate basis so there's simply no reason therefore for the argument of naming the accuser when first accused. Both should be given anonymity until any verdict. If the guy is innocent then he shouldn't be named but if the accuser has blatantly made up the accusation then IMO she should be named,and she would be anyway if the Police then took action against her or the judge found her in contempt.
However, until that man is found guilty then he should IMO also be offered the full anonymity that the accuser receives. How many cases have we seen where a girl has willingly slept with a guy and then basically regretted it in the morning, or her boyfriend has found out, so she cries ! Or other instances where the accuser is just a vindictive bitch who wants to ruin someone's life. As has been said, mud sticks and it doesn't matter if you're accused but found innocent there are plenty of people who will still see them as guilty but just got away with it, as opposed to actually considering that they were innocent.
There have been cases where the accusations by the girl have been so obviously false and thrown out very quickly in court (why the CPS decided it should have gone to court is another matter though!) but still that poor sod has been named publicly. At least in some, not many, cases of obviously false allegations the girl has been prosecuted for it and the guy fortunately has not had his name smeared or life ruined.
Quote by brucie
what about the argument that as is an under reported crime, by naming suspected rapists you could draw past victims out and in to making a complaint?
Quote by neilinleeds
Ben, I guess there are any number of cases where the publicity has led to others coming forward that makes conviction more of a certainty, given the difficulty of securing convictions in a one-on-one he said, she said kind of case.
I can't see the reasoning behind that TBH. If a is convicted and then named (as he should be) then that will bring other people forward if they had also suffered at that person's hands. That will bring further trials and if found guilty of the other rapes make sure that the guy won't be getting out for a very long time.
However, if a guy is on trial for A and named beforehand as in the current system then that will make not one iota of difference to the chance of conviction of that trial as the prosecution simply aren't allowed to bring into court the fact that other people have come forward accusing him of - it's simply not allowed. Those other cases would need to be tried on a separate basis so there's simply no reason therefore for the argument of naming the accuser when first accused. Both should be given anonymity until any verdict. If the guy is innocent then he shouldn't be named but if the accuser has blatantly made up the accusation then IMO she should be named,and she would be anyway if the Police then took action against her or the judge found her in contempt.
Warming the Bed
Hi Flirty
It's being held in a pub in Hove so it's not too far from where your location says you are. dippergt750 is the person organising it so I'm sure she will PM you the exact details. I didn't want to 'step on any toes' and just send you the details myself.
It's being held in a pub in Hove so it's not too far from where your location says you are. dippergt750 is the person organising it so I'm sure she will PM you the exact details. I didn't want to 'step on any toes' and just send you the details myself.
Warming the Bed
If I was caught breaking into an opticians, would my actions have been short-sighted?!
Warming the Bed
Quote by soul-girl
....but there is nothing to stop you cancelling it once you have the mortgage and in the 16 years I've had mortgages the mortgage company has never asked to see a copy of the insurance.
I hope you never have the misfortune to have anything happen to 'your' property because the mortgage lender will be coming after you wondering why their property can't be rebuilt/repaired because you breached your mortgage conditions and decided to stop buildings cover on it. Take a look at all the small print of your mortgage agreement and you'll see what I mean.
As for insurers not covering properties in areas at risk of flood, or had floods in the past, I thought the Government had done something to stop an insurer being able to remove existing cover on a property for that reason? i.e. flood risk and that it's only if a company being asked for new cover on a property that can refuse to do so. I suppose the flip-side of that is that it means that the owner can then be in the position where nobody else would insure them and they are stuck with the existing insurer and there is nothing to stop them pushing the premiums ever higher and higher!
Warming the Bed
There's the Sussex Social on the 5th December if either of you are interested. :-)
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/300212.html
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/300212.html
Warming the Bed
Thanks and yeah, more than likely. Just need to work out what the train options/times are from here.
Warming the Bed
Oooh, only found out about this tonight!
Aiming to come along, just working out the best way for me to get there i.e. get a train (and have a drink) or drive (and no drinky :-( lol)
Aiming to come along, just working out the best way for me to get there i.e. get a train (and have a drink) or drive (and no drinky :-( lol)
Warming the Bed
Oh it's like that is it?! Trade the newbie as a commodity!
You lot are shameless!
I'm feeling right at home already!
You lot are shameless!
I'm feeling right at home already!
Warming the Bed
Quote by BIoke
I'd hardly call that view normal.... it has to be said, you have A FANTASTIC arse mate :thumbup:
Now I know why you were looking at my profile! You won't be surprised to hear that you're not the first to have said that to me - although I do believe you are actually the first guy to have! Quote by Kaznkev
you do have a fab arse
:-) Now everyone's off perving at my profile! :lol: What are you lot like?! I've not been here very long. Have you any idea how all those unsolicited comments make me feel? It's just absolutely, well, totally, err, completely fab! :lol:
Quote by TheLovelyOneUh oh, handbags at dawn! I've never had a dual fought over me before!! :haha:
And I rather like the word 'libertine' ... Move over BIoke! ;)
Quote by fluff_n_stuff
Keep reading the title as All my NAILS have disappeared!
PMSL. Nah they're fine. I stick 'em on with proper nail glue. :lol:
Warming the Bed
Quote by Witchy
If I wasn't already taken...twice...in a no longer playing the field kinda way...that would be a nice avatar.
PMSL. I'll take that as the compliment in which it was obviously intended. :-)
Warming the Bed
In my (limited so far as I'm fairly recent to all this) MMF encounters it's been no surprise (obviously) to see the couple not use a condom. For all I know she may be on the pill or have other contraception in place. When it's been my 'turn' I fully expect to be expected to use a condom and bring my own along anyway. As it happens there's been a supply there that have been handed to me. Never been a problem as it's usually been made clear in the profile. If not I just assume that it will be the case anyway.
Warming the Bed
Okay, all back to normal now!
I'd logged out and back in again and nothing changed, all were still gone, but just come back again and everything is back to normal and all the e-mails are now tere.
Bizarre! Gremlins obviously as you say. I wish they'd all just bugger off and stick themselves in a microwave!
I'd logged out and back in again and nothing changed, all were still gone, but just come back again and everything is back to normal and all the e-mails are now tere.
Bizarre! Gremlins obviously as you say. I wish they'd all just bugger off and stick themselves in a microwave!
Warming the Bed
Just logged on and looked at my Inbox, and Sent box, in which there were a whole bunch of messages, a good number of which I'd saved.
I browsed around the site, including chatroom, and went to reply to a message I'd recently received and every, and I mean every, of my e-mails had gone from the Inbox and Sent folder. Not even ones sent/received inside the last 30 days were there!
WTF happened as it certainly wasn't anything I did!!
I browsed around the site, including chatroom, and went to reply to a message I'd recently received and every, and I mean every, of my e-mails had gone from the Inbox and Sent folder. Not even ones sent/received inside the last 30 days were there!
WTF happened as it certainly wasn't anything I did!!
Warming the Bed
Quote by flower411
...but when we have no ad we often don`t reply as the contact is unsolicited.
That was my 'dilemma' and partly why I started the thread. i.e. a couple may not have an ad looking for a Single Male but have Straight Male in the Looking For bit and would they get pissed off if they got an e-mail that they regarded as unsolicited, which is why I'd erred on caution before and not sent anything.
It sounds like different people have different interpretations of that circumstance i.e. some won't mind being contacted, some see it as unsolicited etc.
As I mentioned above I subsequently 'took the plunge' and contacted a few couples with an appropriate message. If I don't get a reply then not a problem at all, as I'm not necessarily expecting one, especially if they aren't looking to meet up with Single Males at that point. They may just 'keep my details on file' until they are. Hopefully they won't just add me to their ignore list!
Warming the Bed
Quote by twos_company
oh could we not have a place to post those silly messages? give peeps a laugh. :twisted:
Now that's a great idea! lol
Quote by noladreams
I actually think that when I see a profile with loads of categories in the looking for bit that they seem a bit indecisive/desperate/lazy and it puts me off.
Or just very kinky!
Quote by noladreams
You could make it clear in your message why you have approached them, i.e. it says in the Looking for bit on your profile that you are looking for... so I have approached you.
Since I started this thread I've actually contacted a few people that had Straight Male in Looking For but ads or mention of looking for Single Males anywhere and that's exactly what I said in my message. :-)
Warming the Bed
Thanks for the quick replies.
lol
Good points - hadn't thought of it that way. They may not be looking for single males but simply haven't removed the Straight Males bit from the list.
What I'm trying to ascertain basically is if a couple lists Straight Male in the Looking For bit, but no reference to Single Males in the profile text or ads, are they going to get pissed off if Single Males contact them or will they be basically expecting it by listing Straight Males? As I said, so far I've erred on caution and don't contact them unless it's crystal clear that they are looking for Single Males.
But wouldn't that be clear from the Sexuality field of hubby's profile box? What I'm meaning is the Looking For box where it lists what that couple are looking for.
Quote by Dave__Notts
Or they just pressed the wrong button
lol
Quote by Dave__Notts
Could be that they play with single males but not actively looking at this precise moment in time.
Or they could be but want to look for someone themselves and don't want a load of PM's
Good points - hadn't thought of it that way. They may not be looking for single males but simply haven't removed the Straight Males bit from the list.
What I'm trying to ascertain basically is if a couple lists Straight Male in the Looking For bit, but no reference to Single Males in the profile text or ads, are they going to get pissed off if Single Males contact them or will they be basically expecting it by listing Straight Males? As I said, so far I've erred on caution and don't contact them unless it's crystal clear that they are looking for Single Males.
Quote by twos_company
we list as str8 males as hubby is not bi....so when a str8 male meets us he knows that hubby won t jump on him...........
But wouldn't that be clear from the Sexuality field of hubby's profile box? What I'm meaning is the Looking For box where it lists what that couple are looking for.
