Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
northwest____cpl
3 days ago
Bisexual Female, 68
Bisexual Male, 69
UK
Forum
Chams still has a waiting list for single guy membership as far as I know so a social event would be a way of trying it as you don't usually need membership if you are on the social list. Also the Monday night only membership (bi night) will have a shorter waiting list, or none at all. Ring them to check.
Will you fit in? You will be at the upper end of the age range but you won't be alone. How you act around people will be as important as your age in whether you have a good time there. Chams usually has a good mix of ages and sizes so it is well worth a visit.
Will you fit in? You will be at the upper end of the age range but you won't be alone. How you act around people will be as important as your age in whether you have a good time there. Chams usually has a good mix of ages and sizes so it is well worth a visit.
Quote by starlightcouple
Why is it always the poorest in society that get hammered the most?
Because the richest make the rules and they don't give a flying fuck about the poor. Hear the screams about not being able to cope and being forced to move if the mansion tax ever arrives (not likely though).
We've had foxes pass through our garden for at least the last 20 years - the kid's rabbit hutch resembled Fort Knox, but other people in our street have lost rabbits from hutches. I never worried whether a fox would attack one of the kids though, any foxes that appeared in daylight did one very sharpish when they saw a human.
Why worry about an urban fox attacking your baby when you've got a barely tamed descendant of a wolf living in the house with it. Your dog is more lilely to kill the baby than a fox. How much will be spent on a knee jerk reaction that won't work while the more realistic danger is curled up on the kid's bed?
Why worry about an urban fox attacking your baby when you've got a barely tamed descendant of a wolf living in the house with it. Your dog is more lilely to kill the baby than a fox. How much will be spent on a knee jerk reaction that won't work while the more realistic danger is curled up on the kid's bed?
At present the greatest danger of urban children being mauled probably comes from their pet dogs. 2 very well publicised fox attacks in the last few years, how many dog attacks? Before spending a lot of money culling urban foxes maybe we should cull a few dogs, and their owners where possible.
Quote by GnV
No, not at all nw-c.
It just shows how much a mucking fuddle the whole thing is but offering same sex couples a 'marriage' with the sanctity and blessing of the Church won't make it right.
The current legislation specifically says that churches will have the discretion to refuse to perform a wedding for gay couples.
If 'marriage' needs a religious element then surely no opposite sex couples who have a registry office ceremony with no religious blessing should be regarded as 'married'.
If opposite sex couples do not need a religious element to be married then why cannot same sex be regarded as married? If the procreation argument is used to justify refusal of marriage to gay people then anyone firing blanks should have their marriage certificate torn up surely?
Quote by GnV
There are many different sex couples who 'live in sin' and raise children these days without the sanctity of marriage and as you say, for those that prefer, the State recognised Civil Partnership serves them well.
There are also many different sex couples who have the sanctity of marriage who haven't been near a church or received any form of religious blessing. Am I the only one to find the 'sanctity of marriage' a particularly amusing concept in this particular forum?
Quote by flower411
Well !!!!
I must admit I`d never really thought about it before so I had no idea which language was most widely spoken in the UK after English...
Blimey ..... it`s Polish ! Who would have thought it ?
I suppose, if asked, I may have guessed at Indian but then aren`t there loads of Indian languages so not even all the commonwealth immigrants from India speak the same language .
So who else is surprised ?
I am not surprised. But not to worry cometh the Election and UKIP get in, we can send all the foreigners back home were they came from. Let's not just claim our country back, claim our language and all our jobs too. If we go back as far as the 1960's we can claim all our houses back too. In fact fuck it, let's kick everyone out with any Roman or Norman Genes.
Mandatory gene test for all.
What ? You mean I could get a job picking apples or cleaning in a hospital ?
Sweet :bounce:
No, yer a fecking Huguenot, out.
City centre clubs are the Paradise and the Sameplace. Sameplace is towards the fetish side of swinging and dress code can be quite strict. The Paradise is probably your best bet but I would imagine it's quite expensive for a single guy. The B1 cinema has never had any other couples in when we've been. We've never done any of the live-sex shows but imagine they are overpriced - you will see more at one of the clubs and at least have some chance of joining in.
Time to bring back the goldfish Neil.
When the forums were at their height the chat room (singular) had 120 people in at its very busiest, usually far less than that and no cams. At busy times now the chat rooms have upwards of a 1000. It's obvious where most people that want to interact using pixels are spending their time now. Why get involved in a forum arguement when you can watch tits?
When the forums were at their height the chat room (singular) had 120 people in at its very busiest, usually far less than that and no cams. At busy times now the chat rooms have upwards of a 1000. It's obvious where most people that want to interact using pixels are spending their time now. Why get involved in a forum arguement when you can watch tits?
The forums are as dead as ever I have known, long gone are the days of multiple tabs and pressing F5 in an attempt to keep up with a multitude of very fast moving threads. They lost a lot (most) of the very regular posters following the sell out and have gradually been declining in quality and quantity (imo) since then.
Prior to this the cafe had mostly been about having a laugh. The sort of political threads that the CA section catered for were definitely in a minority. There were still fallouts but these happened mostly by accident rather than design. Although a good internet ruck makes fascinating reading for the uninvolved, just like looking at a car crash, it's probably not healthy, and that is all the CA type threads consist of. Why would any but the committed warrior join in them but unfortunately there is very little else to post on.
"Loose the sniping and bring back the fun."
Prior to this the cafe had mostly been about having a laugh. The sort of political threads that the CA section catered for were definitely in a minority. There were still fallouts but these happened mostly by accident rather than design. Although a good internet ruck makes fascinating reading for the uninvolved, just like looking at a car crash, it's probably not healthy, and that is all the CA type threads consist of. Why would any but the committed warrior join in them but unfortunately there is very little else to post on.
"Loose the sniping and bring back the fun."
Quote by Trevaunance
In your post you said users not accounts when that isn't correct, yes it is true over it's lifetime + accounts have been created but many of those accounts have long since been abandoned some never used, people are lazy and in a lot of cases just can't be bothered to delete profiles which has lead to this over inflated figure of A more realistic figure would be a quarter of that and then I'm being generous, only about 15% of the site is active within a 90 day period and by active I mean logged in.
Quote by Trevaunance
a site with over 1.4 Million registered users
I said registered users.
To have an account a user must register themselves, and a registered user has an account. therefore the two terms seem interchangeable as they cannot be seperated.
Before the site was taken over you signed up for the forums and also for the adverts. Therefore many of the pre-takeover accounts were doubled up. When the takeover happened all these accounts were kept, and most, even then were unused. Many of the 1.4 million will be double and probably still unused accounts.
Before this became a pay site it was possible to see the whole forum member list and the number of their posts. I was always about the 100th top poster despite posting rarely. Probably over 90% (educated guess) had signed up and never made a single post - hardly evidence of using. I can't comment on the adverts users because I never signed up or used them but I suspect very similar figures
It is beyond the realms of credibility, with a total population of about 62 million in the UK, with 13 million of those under 18, that 1.4 million are users of this site. If they aren't active then whether they are registered users or not is academic. Most will have had no contact with this site after registering and not instantly getting a shag and cannot be considered to be 'users', although their registered account remains. The headline figure of x million users appears to be a means of parting unwary, desperate people from their money, for a month at least, and letting the punters see the true activity of the site is, rightly, a business secret.
As to why people leave, they always have and they always will. They did when it was free and they continue to do so when it is pay-for. Each person will have their own reasons for leaving or staying and the reasons stated by the op will be valid for some but not others.
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
Your right swinging can be dangerous and there are risks which need to be minimised. Everyone has a different level of what they consider as risky, based on common sense and experience. Although common sense and experience tends to go out the window when lust takes over.
I tend to go in and out of the Chatrooms as well, to see what is happening, just to be nosey and when I was younger I didnt always use a jacket.(Although now older wiser and more respectful, I do). It doesn't make me a bad person.
I have also added not kissing camels to my don't do list.
:laughabove::evil2::thumbup:
You may well laugh but.. this is yet another bitter blow for all our camel members on SH!
:sad: Might as well pack it all in then :sad:
Kiss 'em on the toe, not the lips and yer be ok.
Quote by GnV
As star said earlier, why do the UK public persist in celebrating a terrorist act against the British Parliament and the Monarch of the time after having spent so much celebrating a Diamond Jubilee of the present monarch?
This must be most confusing to many.
I think the celebration is the failure of the plot. It's Guy on the bonfire, not King James.
Where do the fireworks come in then?
Through the letterbox apparently
Quote by GnV
As star said earlier, why do the UK public persist in celebrating a terrorist act against the British Parliament and the Monarch of the time after having spent so much celebrating a Diamond Jubilee of the present monarch?
This must be most confusing to many.
I think the celebration is the failure of the plot. It's Guy on the bonfire, not King James.
Sameplace is brilliant if you want the anything goes, play anywhere, slightly fetishy experience - it's our favourite Dutch club. I don't think they have a dress code on a Friday but some Saturdays are strict fetish-wear only, it might be worth checking.
We weren't impressed by the Paradise, although the premises are excellent. It turned out to be a gangbang night there and the single guys found the concept of NO a little difficult to understand. It remains the only club where we have literally had to run along a corridor to get to a room with another couple while being chased by a gaggle of singles.
We weren't impressed by the Paradise, although the premises are excellent. It turned out to be a gangbang night there and the single guys found the concept of NO a little difficult to understand. It remains the only club where we have literally had to run along a corridor to get to a room with another couple while being chased by a gaggle of singles.
