My guess is that many who refer to themselves as "professional" really mean that they are quite new to this and are sh*t-scared that their friends, relatives, patients, clients, customers might find out that they enjoy (or would like to try) swinging, and are also deeply concerend that somehow they'll find themselves featured in the Sunday papers.
I am professional in what I do and Lilly is a professional (but we don't state it in our profile). Neither of us want to risk "exposure" and indeed she would almost certainly be sacked, so we want to remain as anonyomous as possible until we get to know people.
But what nervous "professional" people fail to take into account is the principal behind why there was not a nuclear war - "MAD": Mutual Assured Destruction.
The bottom line is that "real" swingers treat each other with, at least, care and respect and potentially with love. The issue is to find such real swingers.
We're looking!
The issue is to stop cheats, and I'm sure we are all for that. I'm damn sure that if I am paying my taxes and declaring my income truthfully, then I want everyone else to do the same, whether in regard to the benefits system or the tax system.
However if we have a crappy tax system that is shot full of holes and inconsistencies so that tax can be avoided / evaded if you have enough money to throw at your acountant, and a benefits system that enables scroungers to get lots of my money without working, then I want the systmes changed. But adding even more people into the staffing mix is not the right way to do it. We need complete reform of both systems. Which certainly does not mean giving massive IT or consultancy contracts to the "usual suspects" who were resonsible for the f***ed up and overpriced systems we've got at the moment
As far as using "lie detectors", (phone stress analysis) it is only what is being used by many corporations & departments at the moment.
K
I always thought I was a bit on the large side, but didn't have much experience. But there was once a very experienced woman who, once she was sitting on it, got a very pensive look on her face as she wrigled a bit, then "You're very filling, aren't you?" she said.
A couple of women have pointed out that I'm as thick as their wrists. And the most recent woman we met found me too painfully large (she had a very petite pussy). And it rules out anal with all but the most experienced and well relaxed women
Also, having a big willie can sometimes inhibit my partners orgasm, so they only come - and especially squirt - after I have withdrawn
Being both long and thick has its disadvantages!
Oh, and I forgot to say, that there's an awful of of depressed people who would feel a whole lot better for a good screw. A close friend is a mental health professional and is convinced she'd have far fewer clients if she could prescribe sex on the NHS.
That way being a sex worker can start to become a true profession, with skills tests to be passed, exams ("please excuse the jiggly handwriting") to sit/lie and so on.
Everyone here - virtually by definition - should be willing to support the view that sex acts between and involving consenting adults should not be a shameful activity. I hope that sometime in the future truly professional sex workers (rather than forced or coerced ones) should be recognised as performing a valuable social service and their clients should be recognised as simply paying for professional help that will benefit their daily lives. And I'm, sure that 95% of politicians (excl Anne Widdicombe and a few others) would express the same view - in private. But repressed and repressive "middle england" makes their public support of something like this almost impossible to gain, and we will remain locked into some very dubious Victorian morality.
I tend to agree that London is the main beneficiary, and if we are thinking only about benefit to our young people the money could have given a hugely better return if spent in other ways
I know you are really busy at the moment, trying to find ways to save costs in increase income an' stuff, so I thought I'd suggest a really brave solution to some of your problems:
Legalise and control prostitution as well as the use and distribution of drugs.
Let's face it, we already tax some terribly addictive and potentially damaging drugs, so why not tax those things that we have manifestly failed to control, and which cost us a fortune by way of (failed) policing, court and prison costs and all the social services costs - never mind the human misery and healthcare issues.
Similarly we will never eliminate prostitution. Lets take it from underground and put it above board, to the benefit of the sex workers (male and female) as well as the clients. And it is well known that regularly de-spunked males are a lot less aggressive!
We can raise taxes from all elements of these enterprises, to the great benefit of the exchequer, with reduced costs to the NHS and vastly reduced policing costs. And you will find jobs in administrating these initiatives for some of the civil servants who you otherwise would have to be sacking (and paying sodding big severance payments)
Just a thought
Peace!
Ken
As always, lets not confuse normal with common. In my experience yes it is normal, no it is not particularly common.
It can be a side effect of using a vibrator a lot. Some women trickle, some women gush, others flood. And whilst trickling and gushing are fine, flooding can be a bit of a nuisance, requiring plastic sheeting on the bed!
It does not always accompany a full orgasm, but is often a precursor to one. In my experience there are many flavours and elements of female orgasm: vaginal, clitoral, both, squirting, anal (one woman told me her best orgasms were anal - unfortunately my size means it is very difficult for a woman to accommodate me comfortably up the bum - Lilly has to be very relaxed after an orgasm before she can take anal - which is one advantage that slimly proportioned blokes have!)
