Have a look at this thread, it may help you. (4th comment down)
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
herts
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 57
0 miles · Essex
Forum
Quote by equi-princess
Sorry to give you bad news but the Registered Keeper is the owner in the eyes of the law.
No it doesn't say definately not the owner of the vehicle, as in most cases it is.
The quote I was responding to however, was definate, if you read it.
If it takes a lawyer to read a bloody log book, I would agree Shireen. And if there are any lawyers that can put up a legal argument to say all registered keepers are legal owners, I will be most surprised.
Quote by equi-princess
Sorry to give you bad news but the Registered Keeper is the owner in the eyes of the law. If she wishes to dispute ownership she would have to seek legal advice... unfortunately this would probably cost her almost as much as the car is worth.
Far be it for me to claim to be an expert in all aspects of law, but this is just plainly incorrect I'm afraid.
To finally nail it once and for all, look on the logbook of any vehicle and under the banner of Registered Keeper, it says "The registered keeper is not necessarily the legal owner."
If there are any lawyers on here that are able to overturn that specific piece of legislation, please feel free to contact me as I am sure we could use it to fund a lavish lifestyle.
Just a few thoughts. As said before, keeper and owner are not legally one and the same.
If it was claimed to be a gift, then the woman just needs to ask the man for proof of insurance to show he has used the car, which he has never had. Any court would not believe someone would gift a car to someone else, who would then never use it, surely.
The finance documents could be tricky, but proof of payment from a specific account could help.
And as a few have said, in a domestic situation, it could well be 50/50 regardless.
Let us know how it goes though.
If it was claimed to be a gift, then the woman just needs to ask the man for proof of insurance to show he has used the car, which he has never had. Any court would not believe someone would gift a car to someone else, who would then never use it, surely.
The finance documents could be tricky, but proof of payment from a specific account could help.
And as a few have said, in a domestic situation, it could well be 50/50 regardless.
Let us know how it goes though.
Quote by GnV
Sure, you can get freebies and there are lots of them out there but would you trust a bundle of condoms from an unknown source
We make (part) of our living out of sorting out the mess when clients have not had adequate AV software and have been attacked.
McAfee and F-Secure are good stable products worthy of recommendation. Both are used in a professional environment where it really DOES matter that you get it right.
Funny that, I could make part of my living, if I charged, sorting out the problems Norton and McAfee leave their valued customers with. Just because something is used in a professional environment doesn't mean it is any better than something else.
Equating potential life threatening illnesses with the condom comment, with losing files on a computer is rather over dramatising things, in my opinion. All the major free AV products are from reputable and long standing companies.
There is no one AV product that is the best. It comes down to how responsible the computer owner is, how easy the software is to understand and to use.
In eight years on the internet, not having paid a penny for AV software, I can say I have not had a problem with a virus. The only problems I have had, have been very minor and were adware/spyware related, and sorted quickly.
Go get ya free downloads...you'll luv 'em!
Oh..what I'm using...
AVG anti virus
AVG anti spyware
Zone Alarm firewall (Kerio on one of the others)
Spybot s&d
Adaware
Spyware blaster
Hijackthis
Total
If you do decide to persue things with this woman, just tell your friend that you knew how badly she had treated him, and so you are getting his revenge for him.
You don't have to treat her badly of course, but it might delay him becoming an ex friend whilst you see if you and the young lady get along!
You don't have to treat her badly of course, but it might delay him becoming an ex friend whilst you see if you and the young lady get along!
Quote by
So is a word an insult in one 'tribe' and just normal in another?
Should I pick my word more carefully when not among friends?
I think that is pretty much the case.
I wouldn't go into work and say "hello c**ts" to everyone, but on bike rallies and that, if I get greeted "hello you old C" in the pub, it's taken as a term of endearment!
Strange world isn't it?
Oh just while we are on the C word, why is it universally believed that nearly all women detest hearing the word, even in a jovial and friendly context? Afterall, it is just a collection of letters, much like f**k, which seems almost socially acceptable in many respects.
:boxing: :PI would un-install the NTHell thing, turn off Windows and the ZA firewall.
Then I would try to use the services that do not work to eliminate if it is a firewall problem.
Obviously, if they do work, then you have found the problem. If not, cookies for the relevent services might need to be allowed, if security settings are too high.
If it turns out to be a firewall related problem, It may be beneficial to un-install ZA and download the latest version and install it. The reason being, ZA will then go through a "learning" process of what things you wish to connect to the 'net, by offering the user a yes/no option. It may be easier than getting someone on a phone to go through the ZA settings it already has.
The reason I would use ZA over Windows firewall is that WIndows can keep things out, but last I knew of it, anything already in the computer could connect outwards.
Then I would try to use the services that do not work to eliminate if it is a firewall problem.
Obviously, if they do work, then you have found the problem. If not, cookies for the relevent services might need to be allowed, if security settings are too high.
If it turns out to be a firewall related problem, It may be beneficial to un-install ZA and download the latest version and install it. The reason being, ZA will then go through a "learning" process of what things you wish to connect to the 'net, by offering the user a yes/no option. It may be easier than getting someone on a phone to go through the ZA settings it already has.
The reason I would use ZA over Windows firewall is that WIndows can keep things out, but last I knew of it, anything already in the computer could connect outwards.
A little bit of all of the above, for me I guess.
Often I will have a nose when reading threads, to maybe help see where they are coming from.
I think fear of being labelled as a pest would prevent me more, than the fear of rejection, in using a profile to break the ice and make an initial contact.
Often I will have a nose when reading threads, to maybe help see where they are coming from.
I think fear of being labelled as a pest would prevent me more, than the fear of rejection, in using a profile to break the ice and make an initial contact.
It will be no consolation, I'm sure, but I know of three couples within our circle of friends that are in a similar situation, if not because of the underlying problem that your wife is burdened with. I can only offer my best wishes for her. In one of the three couples, it is the wife that is looking elsewhere. I am surprised in a way, that the support of the "single" male has been as high as it has been in this thread.
Often I have read or at least come away from a thread with the impression of attached males being seen as cheating shitbags. Sure, that's an accurate description to a degree, but it's the reasons behind it that others can't and sometimes, don't wish to know. I suppose it is worth remembering that the more indignant responses to attached men that come from couples, is that the couples in question are by nature of this site, more sexually open to ideas and suggestions. One would assume also, more able to hold a discussion about variety or experimentation without a weeks worth of silent treatment or worse, only a few days of it.
It may be very easy for them to broach the subject of sex outside the marriage for example, where it may well cause untold grief to another couple, even in a sexless relationship. Perhaps because of their enlightened approach to sex, they are not always able to understand how it is that other couples are not in a position to do likewise. In my mind, that is why it seems that phrases such as "..go and sort it out" or "..if you aren't happy with it, leave" are so easily thrown about.
Anyway, have a good weekend everyone.
Often I have read or at least come away from a thread with the impression of attached males being seen as cheating shitbags. Sure, that's an accurate description to a degree, but it's the reasons behind it that others can't and sometimes, don't wish to know. I suppose it is worth remembering that the more indignant responses to attached men that come from couples, is that the couples in question are by nature of this site, more sexually open to ideas and suggestions. One would assume also, more able to hold a discussion about variety or experimentation without a weeks worth of silent treatment or worse, only a few days of it.
It may be very easy for them to broach the subject of sex outside the marriage for example, where it may well cause untold grief to another couple, even in a sexless relationship. Perhaps because of their enlightened approach to sex, they are not always able to understand how it is that other couples are not in a position to do likewise. In my mind, that is why it seems that phrases such as "..go and sort it out" or "..if you aren't happy with it, leave" are so easily thrown about.
Anyway, have a good weekend everyone.
I've not used it for a while, but there is a section where programmes that have tried to gain access to the 'net may have a red cross next to them. Change them to green ticks to allow them out, if that's the case.
I never had any trouble with it, so I don' t think it's ZA being a pain.
I never had any trouble with it, so I don' t think it's ZA being a pain.
Quote by easyease
swinging with a partners knowledge is cool, cheating on an unaware partner isnt..... though i guess only people who have been decieved to and had their hearts broken will share my viewpoint.
if someone is in a loveless marriage they should exit it, lifes too short to be unhappy.
I would agree with all of the above.
Firstly, I agree that honesty about ones domestic situation should be paramount. I am not married, but could be counted as someone who may as well be, but for a certificate and a ring. (For the moment, at least, beyond that, who knows?)
There can't be many people who haven't had their heart broken, and in an ideal world, which this is not, everyone would leave a hopeless situation and be happy ever after. Unfortunately, Hans Christian Anderson doesn't write the script for the majority of us. Nor will he provide another house and a second income that may well be needed to support the blissful life thereafter.
Married men who are able to swing with their partners full consent are in a relationship where that works for them both. Most others are not. I imagine that some, in a longterm relationship or marriage may feel that they are both totally different people than they were when they first embarked on it, possibly barely out of their teens. It may not be a loveless relationship, but to put it bluntly, what about sexless? Should they not wish to disturb what in all other aspects, may be a fulfilling and possibly even a family orientated situation, isn't a no strings arrangement preferable to an affair? That may come under the "sympathy shag" banner, but I would think it is how the subject is discussed with a prospective partner beforehand, if indeed it is relevent to the other party.
Oh and before I go and take cover, not all of the above refers to me or my situation! It is however my obsevations of too many people I know and watched as sadly, their lives have slipped by, both male and female.
I don't post much, but when I do, I will bore the arse off you! :thumbup:
Quote by sexkittenhfx
a great way to show face pics without actually sending them to people is to send invites to your private gallery.
A good idea...
Quote by sexkittenhfx
as to why those people didnt reply to you....are you sure you were what they were looking for?
Ultimately, the only way to find that out was to respond to them. I did match the general criteria, and my comments were observations rather than being a criticism. I know mine is just one of many replies. The way I see it is that I don't expect to hear anything back, if I do, great. If it goes any further than that, even better. I will still be the usual happy me!
I've only responded to four ads, i believe. The first two soon after coming on here, I wrote meticulously and thought for quite a while what to write, as per the ads. It seemed to take bloody ages! All I got back were a long spam replies about how shit this site is and to go to another one etc. I kind of gave up after that.
Recently I responded to another two and just kind of briefly introduced myself and offered to send a face pic, should they be interested. Neither replied, but I never expected them to in all honesty. The reason for not sending a face pic in the first instance would be, as already mentioned, you don't quite know who is going to be getting them.
So a question to single women would be, in general, would a brief introduction be enough to get your attention or would you want a more detailed reply in the first instance?
Recently I responded to another two and just kind of briefly introduced myself and offered to send a face pic, should they be interested. Neither replied, but I never expected them to in all honesty. The reason for not sending a face pic in the first instance would be, as already mentioned, you don't quite know who is going to be getting them.
So a question to single women would be, in general, would a brief introduction be enough to get your attention or would you want a more detailed reply in the first instance?
