Bluethunder's Forum Posts | Swinging Heaven

Join the most popular community of UK swingers now

Bluethunder

Over 90 days ago

Straight Male, 43

Profile Friends Follows Forum

Groups Meets Parties Stories

Forum

8 Sep 2004

I knew someone would be out there, perhaps estate agents arent the pimps im thinking about. Pimps tend to be the assholes ive had to endure, taking great credit in finding me work in any part of the world where there is an international crisis and I can be shot at, and I would imagine earn more money than I would in there airconditioned orifices watching CNN and asking wether I still wanna be on there books. The usual checks are
" do i have to pay you for this conversation?", the usual repsonse:
"no it was included in your initial consoltation fee!"
If I was around long enough to buy a house Id certainly like it via your books, gee I bet the office boy enjoys coming to work! wink

wink

8 Sep 2004

Recruitment agencies, letting agents and agency bosses are basically pimps.
(with the exemption of anyone reading this who happens to have a position in any of the above)

8 Sep 2004

Given then, that there is a chance, shouldnt you use protection for oral aswell as intercourse regardless of the risk factor being lower with oral. A risk is a risk, especially if the standard regs is to not bother with protection when giving/ receiving oral and everyone does it. It only takes one to be carrying.
Obvioulsy I realise that the sensation for both men and women whilst experiancing oral is best without protection but surely safer with :idea: rolleyes

rolleyes

temptation I guess,uhm.

7 Sep 2004

Ill say Calista redface

redface

7 Sep 2004

That about sums it up! Although perhaps substitute the stella for guiness, or maybe the cabernet.

7 Sep 2004

My hands are held high to recieve the beating (offcourse I dont deserve it :cry: )
Judy, ill take that branch, in fact ive got it, wether you pushed it my way or not!
dunno

dunno

:giveup: :thumbup:

7 Sep 2004

Im no longer digging, and as I feel Roger identified what I said with his own experiances was probably just trying to help my case. So ill also add, that from this point Roger wont be extracting any more earth, will you Roger. lol

lol

7 Sep 2004

Ive tried it to Roge me old pal, didnt work here either, but hey my posts count is increasing, maybe ill soon get to the rank of Captain, General or in Judys case QC? lol

lol

Joke

cool

7 Sep 2004

Judy-

confused

Neil, mon amigo (cant speak mexican, spanish or even dutch, discounting four o clock in the morning fuled to the brim with whiskey), forget it, whatever it was,wasnt, huh?
Roger, praise be to roger, i have just done a tour of Rogers Rogerland,LMAO. You are a litery genius. Therefore, frequenting the folk in your site and transposing the situation here, nothings new is it. Am I now your young guided one and you the jedi master?
All rejoice to the single male :twisted:

7 Sep 2004

Judy, are we going to kiss and make up and accept this for the misunderstanding that it is? wink

wink

(he sais sincerely...honest!)
I do believe it was me you were defending in the initial post, you just didnt know it then biggrin

biggrin

7 Sep 2004

Quote by roger743
oit is not statistics it is finding what you want, and how to experience it with others who want the same things!

What I interpreted he meant by "statistics" was; the more people you encounter, the more chance there is of encountering someone intellectually or sexually compatible with yourself.
But I could be wrong.
No Roger you were right. Seems everyone has got the completey wrong spin except you

7 Sep 2004

I would formally like to stand down as the candidate spokesman for presenting the :"From a siingle males point of view". Not that what ive said I dont beleive in, more of I didnt ask for the role. As I said, stuck my head above the parapet at the wrong time. Not sure wether your post neil was directed soley at me or in general towards the subject. Perhaps I have become the subject as I am this single male.
If this had have been the start of a new and wonderful relationship with SH, then I surely have got off on the wrong foot it would seem. On the 18th im out of here (No judy, not Saudi yet), so ill be trying to keep my nose in topc until then. regards

7 Sep 2004

Right to reply: OK here goes (hoping that the bobcat digger has run out of fuel confused

confused

)
I can catergorically say, from the first post in this thread, that I was neither putting the boot into to one individual or the SH system. Merely presenting an opinion based my experiance. Which we all now believe to be void based on thirty days redface

redface

As far as the forum is concerned, as Roger and a few others say, that is the way to go. It is most definate the best way to meet new folk and gauge them for yourself. Imagine if we'd met through an add Judy? lol

lol

House on fire? :lol:
After reading Lucifers post re: single ladies on SH, indeed I can imagine how this double edge sword cuts deeper for them.

7 Sep 2004

CAA authorities? Im definately gonna leave this place. Dont tell me libra your cabin crew, or did you just happen to come across a guy who thought cockpit meant exactly that? lol

lol

7 Sep 2004

Quote by Bluethunder
The potential of this site is down to the individual and the availablity of those at the that time. That is to say, there are/ are not people who will work well with eachother for their respected objetives through this site at any one time. There is a certain amount of luck involved, that the adds are timed well!
Surely Neil, you wont deny me this? However, I suspect, if you spend all your time in here, seeking out new contacts, statistics dictate you will eventually become succesful
:

If were going to be going on about this, this is what I put, again Neil, no reference to you and your posts rolleyes

rolleyes

7 Sep 2004

Neil the reference to you ended before the question mark. No boot intended to anyone here. redface

redface

If you replied with all the quote, you will se that statemant in a different light. I feel not the need to cross examine.

7 Sep 2004

sad

JUDGE Judy
What do I say to all that, I contributed to this topic I did not want to become the subject of it.
When you say been with us for 30 days, I presume you are looking beneath the avatar, 15th July 2004 and working back, right.
This is fine, but im not talking about the open forum and neither were you. I was referring to the photo add system which I have been visiting now since the start of the year. Confess, not long compared to some im sure, but even with the punctuation of sleep, food and work still long enough to try dont you think. I fail to see the correlation of my first post to this one being evidence of how hard I have tried or not.
The reason for me not using this forum or the site in future is relocation, no home access and not something for the machines at work.
Please I hope, whilst not cross examining you, you don't think my first reply to your initial post was some low attempt at a sympathy vote to attract attention on this mad tangent.
For all your good words which im sure describe so many, they are to an extent, wasted on me. Whilst you hint at not referring directly, you clearly are. Previous posts from other users had the balls to be direct, courtesy dictates you do the same. Or is this asking too much? rolleyes

rolleyes

I would suggest, whilst you obviously spend much time here and have seen a lot, you dont judge everyone the same. Categorizing somebody on a few posts and there profiles is poor approach at making such sweeping statemants.
Perhaps this has shown the dangers that the modern world of telecommunications has brought us- confusion/misunderstanding. Whilst people spend hours on the internet and days speaking to one another via text message, its no wonder society is as it is to eachother. The lack of real contact and good old human body language and tone has a part to play in this I feel.

7 Sep 2004

JudyTV
Ironically you started it, and you've finished it. Not that I feel that ive dug a wee hole for myself but, I see your point. On those specifics it doesnt look good. I do however know, what i have done and not done in this relatively small period of time. I reserve the right to say wether, hand on heart I HAVE tried or not. I believe I did. I use the past tense because, just now, for a shortwhile atleast I wont have the luxary of a connection to this wonderful cyber world. That is not to say I wont be paying you all a visit once in a while, and maybe chucking my pennys worth in around the forum atleast.
Once again, all the best to you and the site smile

smile

7 Sep 2004

Roger, your exactly right and, this was exactly my course of action. I stopped, stopped looking and deleted my add. In fact I only replied to this thread in the onset to offer my opinion and experiance as I thought it relevant. Some may say i've given up, but there was no mission outlined from the begining, just something new I thought id try. For me, for whatever ever reason, nothing came of it. Hopefully I havent lost out, yes time-some, but it was a risk I undertook and being a virgin to this did not know what honestly to expect.
The potential of this site is down to the individual and the availablity of those at the that time. That is to say, there are/ are not people who will work well with eachother for their respected objetives through this site at any one time. There is a certain amount of luck involved, that the adds are timed well!
Surely Neil, you wont deny me this? However, I suspect, if you spend all your time in here, seeking out new contacts, statistics dictate you will eventually become succesful.
Perhaps then, the point is, this site isnt for the half hearted or peops who "think ill give it ago, maybe, probably etc etc" and those who really put effort in.
If I carry on like this I will be detracting from my initial replies and contradicting myself, thus, Ill stop rolleyes

rolleyes

7 Sep 2004

This thread is still running lol

lol

, without I soon methinks
All points taken onboard :!:
Steve, I hope that support wasn't anything to do with the fact you are unfortunate enough to reside in the west mids :lol:
Neil, indeed you are right. cool

cool

Alex, thanks wink

wink

Roger, this was my line of thinking :idea:

7 Sep 2004

Quote by Vix
especially when the same adds you tried to contact are renewed to the front of the pile.

You expect people to let their ads fall of the page, or stop looking, just because they have decided that you are not what they want?
this because after receiving replies that do not 'fit' with what they want (like yours) they decide that their ad maybe needs changing. Is that not OK?
With risk of doing myself more damage, perhaps I wasnt clear with what I meant with regards to the adds system. WIth the adds I have approached, Ive done so in the best balanced and sincere way I know how, trying to follow there criteria to the letter. If I felt I didnt meet the initial brief, I would not apply. NO cheesey one liners or garbage from me just straight genuine description or questions. Where I fall down, is I dont include a photo of myself (V stupid I know), but at that first stage see it not necessary. When applying to adds without photo's aswell surely there is no harm.
My gripe perhaps (and the initial post was not meant to be a gripe-sorry if thats how it came across folks rolleyes

rolleyes

) is; ive never had a response, not a "no thanks", "f-off", nothing, then you see the add turned around again and back on the front of the boards. Kinda makes you feel why did I bother. Sure, maybe there add was misleading and the response wasnt what they wanted, but most arent changed, just reset to the top of the pile. The only response I ever had, looked suspcsiously automated, and indeed redirected me to another site where a fee was required to contact that person. Given my lack of success I closed that line of enquiry.
I hope this isnt pissing anyone off, but the statistics are stacked in favour of the lady or indeed a couple (as long as there is a lady in there somewhere). Just look at how many Male for female adds there are then compare them to the small number of female for male.
The argument, everyone else finds it ok it must be you, if you dont like it go away! Is a little unpleasent, no one wants to feel and outcast.
This is indeed a very good, genuine, clean site and an excellent medium for most. If nothing else for me, it is a brilliant source of advice.
Thanks for the time folks, take care smile

smile

6 Sep 2004

Aye that all that makes sense and too true. Alas from the Single male point of view, it is difficult. I think maybe there are few presumptions that underpin the problem for single fella's, like why are you single, your too young, your after just getting your end away etc etc.
Its difficult to come through that and try and convince someone thats not what you are about. Unfortunately, this feeling has no doubt been derived through too many, need I say immature and blunt unemotional twerps who indeed feel thats its a free meal ticket.
It is a shame that it can ruin it for the sincere folk. I have yet to progress to a real encounter through this forum, not through lack of trying or genuine honesty. It would seem the photo adds are virtually impreginable and stacked way in the ladies favour. No matter how honest I pitch an add, ive yet to get a response. No matter how I go about an introduction, im yet to get a reply. It does rather get on ones tits after a while, especially when the same adds you tried to contact are renewed to the front of the pile.
Am I ranting here? probably, lol

lol

, ok all take care biggrin

biggrin

20 Jul 2004

Ooh, yeah sci-fi, all of em.
All the bonds, any clancy adapated film, Hunt for red october, a sum of all fears etc
Any Jerry Bruckheimer/Don Simpson produced film, eg Crimson Tide, the Rock, Days of thunder. Top Gun, Le Mans. I also love the underdog films, doesnt matter the theme. I like chick flicks, and when the guy gets screwed over (its good to feel your not the only one :cry: wink

wink

) Sleepless in seattle ( Tom Hanks plays such an adoreable looser). Apollo 13 etc etc. Rocky films ("adrian"), nam films, shawshank redemption,
Gladiator, Sparticus, Heston films, airport films (just so i can rip them apart about there inaccuracies and jackanory).
Anything with a twist at the end! cool

cool

16 Jul 2004

Yeah Div is defo a harsh term of endearment.
In the mids, its usually mate or Boss.
For the ladies, flower, petel, canderal (or is that just me-jee im such a dickhead)
Deadwood is also a up and coming term, usually implied to someone junior to yourself for example
"Oi, deadwood, did you get the sambo's?"
" Yeah!"
" i ordered on brown.......bloody deadwood"

16 Jul 2004

I understand that only too well, but in the past it hasnt seemed to stop from trying and on occasion with suprise, succeeding biggrin

biggrin

16 Jul 2004

True british army style:
"........Fancy a smash?........." :twisted:

16 Jul 2004

Quote by tallnhairy
I'm a nut into first aid and ambulance type stuff as my hobby at weekends. So those of you into motorsport may have been put back together by me, who knows...
...

Trouble is hairy, you guys love those wet sponges and asprin, but thats no good when my bloody legs hanging off mad

mad

wink

16 Jul 2004

Ok folks, im on a diet as of now. No wanking for a month :cry: . And try and shag more, yeah right, at the moment im never out much to find anyone (which is why im on here mad

mad

) all work and no play.
As for the tradesmans entrance, chance would be a fine afraid im a virgin when it comes to that redface

redface

, never pushed for it, if you pardon the pun.
Thanks again for all your advice on this matter its much valued.
Ill try sorting it myself before seeing the doc, i have a medical coming up in December though and may mention it then to the ladies of the CAA if nothing changes, most of them are russian and rather horny. cool

cool

Cheers folks smile

smile

16 Jul 2004

Ok
A new spin, bums are great, but to the ladies (andmen if thats your thing?), what about hairy bums? Mine im told is like a baboon :cry: Its rather black (im white) redface

redface

. Nobody has ever been to harsh, but then you wouldnt!
Should i get it all off back to nice n smooth? rolleyes

rolleyes

16 Jul 2004

Again, thanks all cool

cool

A few points.
First maybe i over emphasised the wanking, i included it in the original post to demonstrate that everything works fine confused

confused

In reality my wanking pattern is like the weather. At times ill have one a day (normally in the evening) and at other times can go a week. I feel that after a week, I shuold have one as a matter of course, like an oil change. Dont know wether that makes sense, something for you to think about wink

wink

Im defo gonna try a different wanking claw lol

lol

ie softer.
Interesting that a fellow baldy has the same problem, sorry had the same problem and that a condom means no chance of cumming. That also refelects true of me, ive only ever come without a condom (something there me thinks)! This makes life difficult tho, as im perhaps oversafe not that such a thing is ever a problem.
Thanks to all you lovely folk who have said hiya and velkom! CHEERS biggrin

biggrin