Easy's Forum Posts | Swinging Heaven

Join the most popular community of UK swingers now

easy

Over 90 days ago

Straight Male, 52

•

Bisexual Female, 43

0 miles · Lancashire

Profile Follows

Meets Parties Stories

Forum

21 Aug 2010

I use AVG on all my computers, but I'm started to become a little perturbed with it as it seems to be heading the way of Norton and getting into more and more stuff. I've got half the features turned off now. confused

confused

AVAST! has always had a good reputation.
I tend to have an antivirus etc running in the background, but if I have any problems I usually do a Trend Housecall along with a Spybot/Ad-aware scan as I've found in the past that AVG hasn't found problems while scanning, but has been triggered while doing a spyware scan. :? dunno

dunno

Last time I had a problem I also tried PANDA's version of housecall which seemed ok.
You pays your money, you take's ......... oh wait! :doh: redface

redface

:lol2:

21 Aug 2010

Probably not ...... :eeek: :scared:

21 Aug 2010

Sorry Browning but it was pulled because of the comments made within the thread (again).
If you wanna start the thread again and let people air their views on the topic and not on each other I can't see a reason why you shouldn't (I may even be able to dig out your start post. PM me if you want it ;) ).

20 Aug 2010

Don't know if you say them in the other thread Mr. Admin, but lorna_2009 and Doktor_Bob have also asked to join the fun. :thumbup:

14 Aug 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
.........A real Tory would never ever ever vote Labour..........

A true Tory believes in the values of capitalism, where everything is for sale ........ including, morals, scruples and political persuasions. On that basis I think you can hold your head high next time you happen to walk past the Conservative club. ;) :lol2:
Lets face it, New Labour was pretty much Conservatism with a different coloured bow, that's how they managed to win the election, by seducing Tory voters. Did you realise you'd been seduced by Tony Blair when you voted New Labour? :shock: :giggle:

12 Aug 2010

*Gets steam cleaner out and blasts dust away*
:mrgreen:

12 Aug 2010

Quote by vampanya
I think we should do that---maybe reduce it to six points for a ban.

So you would say it would be ok to ban someone for doing 44 mph twice in a 40 zone?
Correct me if im wrong but aren't cameras calibrated to the speed limit + 10%. over 44mph would trigger it but 44mph shouldnt't.
Going from memory here (so no links to back it up redface

redface

:lol2: ) it used to depend on the police force's (ie chief constable) decision. Some areas of Wales used to run a zero tolerance policy on certain roads. so 41 in a 40 would see a NIP land on your mat and they'd rely on most people not having the knowledge of how to challenge the notice, but just accept it and pay up.
It used to be areas of Wales that were by and far the worst for this, especially for bikers ..... where do you live again Ben? :giggle:
There's also approximately a 5% tolerance in your speedo and in electronic components and extremes of temperature can also affect adjustments, which is why speed detection equipment should be calibrated on a regular basis. There's also evidence that police routinely misuse handheld equipment and that some of the devices used can be very easily mislead, so your speedo may indicate that you're under the limit, but the misused/easily fooled handheld device says you're not and they'll chance a fine. sad

sad

I must admit I dislike the current speed enforcement system and the fact that now you're threatened with a fine and points if you don't incriminate yourself after receiving a NIP. There was a case a couple of years ago taken to the European courts of Human Rights because the HRA says that you cannot be threatened into incriminating yourself. The outcome was that you can't be threatened into incriminating yourself unless you own a driving licence, in which case you're human rights are suspended and you're shafted. confused

confused

I discussed this once with a mate of mine who at the time was a magistrate. He said that he'd regularly dismiss cases before they were presented because of the pressure of their workload and he felt that if a member of the public had taken the time to attend court, then they must feel they have a good argument for the attempted conviction being unsound, therefore it wasn't worth his time to hear it.
At this point I bought him a very large drink. :lol2:

6 Aug 2010

Quote by Kaznkev
.............It is a cowardly way to post opinions.

There's many reasons for 'sock' accounts, perhaps someone has something very sensitive they want to unload and feel they can't under their normal account. dunno

dunno

5 Aug 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
...............
Yes that is correct Davey but....that is something that as a moderator you would have to keep private.
I do not think the site owners would be very happy if that information was disclosed to anyone outside of the moderator team.

Interesting point this. I did look at it a couple of months ago when we had someone using another account to cause problems and whilst I agree it may be bad practice to reveal who a second account belongs to, as it's not personal data, I can't find anything in the rules to prevent us from doing so. It's completely down to the mops discretion.
I suppose you could argue 'naming & shaming', but unless you've done something to be ashamed of I don't really see the relevance in this particular scenario.
Funny ol' things rules, aren't they? ;)

4 Aug 2010

Some of the points he makes are perfectly relevant, albeit covered in PR clap-trap.
There's no such thing as a bad food, it's down to frequency and quantity that we eat. There's no problem eating a breakfast that contains 10% of GDA (GDA IIRC refers to adult consumption) for sugar as long as you adjust the rest of the days intake accordingly (and clean your teeth after the meal :lol2: ).
In my experience most people have little or no understanding of what the labels on food refer to, how to use the information or how to manage their diet, which is why I kind of agree with him about the 'traffic light' system of product information. It's pointless making foods bad as all it does is add self-denial and guilt to a natural activity ........ then again certain churches have been doing that for hundreds of years. innocent

innocent

:giggle:
We need to consider what and how much we eat in the context of an extended time period and not just at each meal.

3 Aug 2010

Quote by Shaz_and_Tony
I have 2 kinds of therapy, Cognitive behavioral psychotherapy and another with a psychiatist and find them helpful, far slower results than I had hoped though.
Tony ;-)

CBT tries to alter behaviour that has taken years to evolve, this is why it often needs an extensive number of sessions for there to be a sustained change.
Psychotherapy can be like peeling an onion layer by layer. If you're not ready to question the parts of yourself, then you need to wait until you are (if ever). Sometimes it doesn't come, sometimes you're not even aware what needs peeling. A good therapist will try several different ways of getting you to peel the areas you both identify as being problematic. ;)
To answer the op: yes and yes and still do in one guise or another.

29 Jul 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
..................
The last two threads that were taken off were a direct result of comments you made....will let others make their own minds up on that one............

Just wanted to clarify that this is Ken's assumption based on the limited facts he has available to him and should not be regarded as accurate. ;)
Awayman & Kentswingers777: If you wish to discuss the topic then please make your points without bickering. If you wish to bicker, please do it between yourselves via PM. Ty.

27 Jul 2010

Maybe it's the internet version of kiss-catch. :giggle:

27 Jul 2010

:doh:
Forgot there were other options. redface

redface

So no Uggs then? :lol2:

26 Jul 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
............Can you please show us all this blog so we can all make our own minds up about the intentions in this thread.

We're working on it as I type. ;)

26 Jul 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
.......And people tell me you have no sense of humour.

Have you been using one-dimensional reference sources again?
@Kaznkev: No probs, my PM box is always open. biggrin

biggrin

Quote by BIoke
He doesn't need a sense of humour when he's as perfect as he is silly! They should put him in a mould and sell little dolls of him.. yum yum

redface

surprised

ops: :lol2:
You weren't in my bushes on Thursday morning were you? :scared: :lol2:

25 Jul 2010

Quote by Dirtygirly
I've just started wearing leggings but I wear them with a skirt. I've never been comfortable in a short skirt but now that my legs are actually taking shape I quite like the leggings/skirt combo.

I suspect I'm probably too old for it but I'm really not caring!! :giggle:

Trainers or stilettos?

25 Jul 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
.....I am sorry if you feel that way, I can assure you I am as calm as a ducks bottom on a Sunday evening.

Don't have to be agitated to be aggressive fella and apology accepted Ken. :thumbup:

Quote by Kaznkev
Easy its on another sex site,well a fetish site,the well known American one,if it doesnr break the aup i will post a link here.
Or i could pm u it.
There are a trolls all over the net,i simply liked the kinda snarky,kinda serious take this witty woman took on it.

Can you PM me the link Kaz and I'll take a look and post it if it's cool. Thanks. biggrin

biggrin

25 Jul 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
Who the fuck is Ken

Sorry. I'd just taken Kenty to the next logical abbreviation. If it offends you I can use something else.

Quote by kentswingers777
I could not give a monkeys if anyone thinks it is " advertising " for the Mail, there is a purpose there.
Some may well say they are " inflammatory or Trolling " hence this thread. You should know by now that I do not care what anyone thinks of my posting or it's style..it sparks debate for good or bad. You may well think it is a " one dimensional reference source ", but that is just your opinion and like me you do not make the rules, just abide by them. Which they do, whether you think so or not is irrelevant to me to be honest, the same as anyone else.

Quite a reaction from someone who doesn't care. :shock: I'd have thought that most people who read comments they don't care about would not bother replying to them. confused

confused

Yes, you're quite right, I have have to abide by the rules, but I also have to interpret and apply them to different situations too.
I'd just like to add that you're coming across as quite aggressive at the moment.

Quote by kentswingers777
I write what I write for a purpose and that is to get people to post...be it in a negative or positive thought pattern.

Why do you feel this need to get people to post?

25 Jul 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
Well mrs777 is more than satisfied with my performance in bed, in fact she wishes guys half my age had the same stamina....so the thread is obviously not aimed at me, thank goodness.
To be honest I think it is all a load of old cobblers to be honest,could the same be said about people who start threads for not a lot of purpose
Just a thought for discussion perhaps.

You mean this bit Ken? I didn't realise you were looking for comments. I felt it was more of a rhetorical question or an observational style comment, but as you've asked.....
For someone to take the time to create a new thread or post there must be a purpose. We may not agree with the purpose, or it may break the AUP, but there is intent and purpose behind every topic and every thread.
For example, your Daily Mail advertising .... I mean threads :doh: :lol2: in Current Affairs. Some could argue they were posted to be inflammatory or trolling, but I'm sure your motivations were pure and you just wanted to spark debate, albeit with a very one-dimensional reference source IMHO.
Kaz, can you provide a link to this blog please? It's an interesting (if somewhat narrow) view and I'd like to take a look at it. Thanks.

20 Jul 2010

Quote by Islandcpl1
............ and stop sending threatening e-mail

Ok first point. EVERY member of the site is subject to the AUP. Mods and Ops included. If you feel that ANYONE is threatening you I strongly recommend you forward any evidence you have to either Admin, St3v3 (site owner) or raise a support ticket and refrain from making allegations on the open board, as all this does is aggravate any situation. :thumbup:
Next .... I was perplexed by this bit ....

Quote by Islandcpl1
..........FYI,,,, our parties are held in full knowledge of our mortgage provider, the local council, and authorities have full knowledge of our parties..........

Most swingers I have met tend to shy away from telling anyone, especially the people you mention above, about their lifestyle choice. I commend you on your absolute honesty and openness, but fail to see why they need to know if you're not running a commercial venture, unless you're inviting members of the local council. Now I see where my council tax money's going. :doh: (I'm being flippant. Sorry. redface

redface

).
Penultimately .... I understand if you don't wish to tell people what you charge, but I'm interested how you calculate the exact amount of losses, breakages, consumption etc prior to the event to get the entrance fee? If you're estimating, then surely there's been times when it's under and times when it's over? I'm not really up to speed on all the business terms, but isn't that sometimes referred to as loss and profit? confused

confused

dunno

Finally ...... As you have pointed out, the thread is called 'ridiculous observations' and you ask for

Quote by Islandcpl1
................. other ridiculous comments or observations people have seen or heard

(if you feel this is taken out of context I appologise)
As you've indicated that you'd like to read what is a subjective opinion (ie the ridiculous) I can't see that you can complain that the thread is going off topic when people express that opinion, be it right or wrong in your view.

12 Jul 2010

At the risk of repeating Dirtygirly ......
Chat Ops deal with problems in chat in real time. That means that they can deal with problems in chat, kick and ban people as they happen. Mods cannot do this.
If people feel happy to report problems to a mod, then this is fine, but Mods cannot deal with an issue and will only pass information to admin for them to follow up.
The only exceptions to this rule are myself and Dawnie, who have access to both chat-op and mod controls.
Kentswingers777: Strangely enough those that provide assistance to the running of the site are probably best placed to know what their roles do and do not entail. Your comments aren't helping and your attempts to pass your own opinion as fact are misleading and ill-informed.

10 Jul 2010

My advice highlighted was aimed at problems in chat in general and not about the specific problem the o/p described (or particularly about room hosts). If you look at the next paragraph I do say 'in this instance......' which is where I comment on the o/p's problem.
In this (the o/p's) case the room host was the offender and has been dealt with appropriately by admin.
Hope that clarifies the intentions behind my post and sorry for any confusion. :thumbup:

10 Jul 2010

@ Browning:
Please don't read this as having a go, because I'm not. I'm trying to challenge your interpretation of experience.
If every experience we have when meeting members of a social is negative, or we're told that they're going to be negative, then it can become a self-forefilling prophecy. Could it be that you already have an idea about how this group will behave and then look for people who support that idea? I'm guessing that the woman you described wasn't the only African woman to get on your bus that day. Her child may be teething and she might have had 4 hours sleep in the last 3 days because of it. Maybe because she was tired she made a mistake and came in the wrong doors and because she was at her wits end you copped for it. Who knows. dunno

dunno

It's a bit like the assumption that all youth are feral. confused

confused

Or all coppers are bastards ...... well.... :? (joke :lol2: bolt

bolt

) and frankly it's one of the barriers that stops our society progressing.
I have a notion that people wearing suits for work are officious-looking which forms a barrier between people, which is why I avoid wearing one whenever I can, but while I have this idea I also try to reserve judgement about someone wearing one until I know more about the individual in an attempt to challenge my own preconception.

9 Jul 2010

Quote by Lost
...........

The triggers can only come from the mind in the end Dave even if its just chemical stimulus the mind has to sanction it.

Interesting point. Are you referring to the conscious mind here? If so how do you explain your heart beating and your breathing while asleep? When you accidentally burn yourself, do you need to think before moving the part afflicted?
Muscle spasms in quadriplegics is also a well known issue. This means that there's no direct connection to the brain, but there's still a movement. There was a guy in a wheelchair on a sex TV program a few nights ago that was paralysed from the mid-chest down who was talking about having sex. If the mind has to sanction an erection, how does he manage to do that as his connection is broken?

Quote by Missy
In a more prolongued situation, I don't know cos the adrenalin thing can't be sustained for long periods - maybe once the adrenalin 'fight or flight' senses kick in, and someones stimulating a certain sense, it keeps it heightened??
I really don't know, just something my mind was pondering early on :dunno:

Adrenaline levels after a trigger begin to approach normal levels after around 90 mins. During this time agitation and the risks of a re-triggering of adrenaline are increased.

8 Jul 2010

Quote by Lizaleanrob
can anyone tell me if so many women that have been fantasize about it why do we lock rapists up

Women fantasise about forced sex role-play in a safe environment and where they give themselves over to someone but ultimately remain in control of the situation and not about being . The difference being that one is with consent and the other isn't which means that one's illegal and the other isn't.
As I said before I dislike the term ' Fantasy' as it causes confusion about the word and detracts from the realities of what is.
My experiences are that as human beings we all have differing responses to trauma and that while some survivors will exhibit a lot of the recognised issues, some will only show one or two and others will display some behaviour that may appear illogical to those observing. To the person behaving their ideas and actions seem perfectly reasonable and rational given the circumstances. Such is human nature.

Women who had been comprised 21% of the sample. Of the aversive fantasies, 36% were written by women who had been .

Around 13% of the total number of those involved in the study? (I think confused

confused

Sorry if I'm wrong).

8 Jul 2010

Quote by Dave_Notts
................
And the police also have specialised units that can deal with civil matters.
I read a book about SO19 or something like that. In there they had an army officer, special forces, who had a tour with the unit. He was amazed at the end of it that what the SAS practice, SO19 were doing on a weekly basis.
I am not saying SO19 is better than the SAS but IMO the civil authorities should deal with civil issues and the army not getting involved unless the civil authorities can not cope.
Dave_Notts

Agreed, think that is what I said, or meant to say.
The police have many units, some made up of ex SAS and the like, who police as normal in different areas and divisions and then go away on training exercises together, for things such as terrorist attacks on oil platforms and other instillation's. These are less well known.
The book is The Good Guys Wear Black by Steve Collins. IIRC the most notable point was that it was they that undertook the operation at the Millennium Dome to prevent the diamond theft, which I think the SBS were credited with by the press.
As a result of the amount of live operations the London firearms team sees, it's alleged that there's now ongoing secondments from the special forces into this police unit.

8 Jul 2010

Quote by kentswingers777
Sorry I do not believe for one second any woman would climax whilst being ....the fear, the thought of possible serious injury..............

I know I'm wasting my energy writing this as your views are fixed and anything that challenges them will be met with ridicule, disbelief, disdain and possibly even threats of violence if you didn't already know that it would get you banned, however that's my opinion of your personality type and I digress....
I come into contact with a lot of people who have been through many horrible experiences when I'm at work and I recently met a very nice gentleman who's story was that he's been sexually abused while aged 13 - 17 including . He did mention that on several occasions he had maintained an erection and even climaxed while being subject to these assaults. For years he agonised over his sexuality as a straight man shouldn't be aroused while being abused by a man. He's now a councillor (specialising in sexual dysfunction and ), he said he regularly hears similar experiences to his own.
I can see how women may climax during . It's an autonomic response, similar to achieving an erection for males (as Dawny has pointed out.).
I hope that you can maintain this naivety and lack of experience around this subject as to lose it would mean that you, or someone very close had been .
Oh and for the record, I dislike the use of the phrase ' Fantasy' as I do believe that it detracts from a wicked and despicable act, but I accept that people call it what they call it and people cannot always be shoehorned into the little boxes we'd like them to go in to.

Quote by kentswingers777
..........
I hope admin put this sick topic to bed, and move onto more enlightening subjects, not subjects such as forced and climaxes whilst being by some filthy perve, and then people want to say all sorts of rubbish on a subject they have no clue about.................

Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your perspective) you do not own the site and have no real authority or input to it's running so, at the risk of repeating Mr. Notts, unless those that enforce the rules decide that it breaks the AUP (or needs to be locked to allow people to cool off), it will remain open for discussion.
I await your undoubted response, but sometimes I just have to ask Y.......

7 Jul 2010

Frankie Knuckles ~ Your love. biggrin

biggrin

(or Jamie Principle who did the original (allegedly))

7 Jul 2010

Hi Karentvxx,
You can also use the 'Report this profile' button at the bottom of the offenders profile page too, but the most important information we need from any kind of contact are the time, date, which server and room name, plus the name of the offender(s) if any.
We keep logs for quite a while from the chat rooms, so as long as you give the information above Admin can usually find it and read what has been said.
I think in this instance the room may have closed after it was left empty as I can't see any of the ops saying they closed it. sad

sad

Given the information you've posted here I've asked for Admin to have a trawl through the records for today and see if they can locate the logs for this room.
Hope that helps. biggrin

biggrin