Quote by keef69
This is her again, click on squirting contest.
OK, I like to think I can admit it when I'm completely clueless.
What exactly was that, that that that, that that, that I just saw?
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
pendant
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 64
0 miles · Cambridgeshire
Forum
Quote by MQ
It is interesting but why do larger ladies have to be shoved in a 'specialist tastes' category?
Why do those men who through no fault of their own have a preference for the slimmer figure have to be shoved in a 'specialist tastes' category?
Quote by Bari
But (as happened to an attractive but large friend of mine) when you hear about guys walking up to bigger women in a pub and without any reason saying "Christ, you're a fat bitch aren't you"
That sort of rudeness is a good argument for bringing back the stocks.
Quote by AndyS-NE
if you like how you look f*ck everyone else - if you don't like your appearance and it gets you down do something about it!!
Sometimes that's not possible.
But, as you say, different strokes for different folks
Quote by givemeahug
we all have our own minds and our own tastes.....and yes if the world was full of the same boring figures and faces then it would be so very boring.....
Hey, that's what I just said
:kiss: 
Quote by JonJon
Point taken about the message of the thread getting waylaid.
When are we going to wake up and do something about this?
I'd hazard a guess at never. There's no political, economic, or, locally, social advantage to helping the starving thousands of miles away. Fortunately there are aid organisations doing something, because there's very little chance of governmental interest in an issue that will not win votes
I can think of a few "local social advantages"... quoting myself from earlier:
Perhaps if we as nations went and actually DID something to cure the world's problems instead of leaving it up to under-resourced charitable organisations, we might get those who currently don't like us very much to sit up and notice that we are actually the nice people we like to think we are?
Theoretical local social advantage 1: Less terrorism
Theoretical local social advantage 2: Less money spent/(wasted?) on things like having security officers armed with sub-machine guns patrolling public places (I saw one at Heathrow airport only yesterday)
Theoretical local social advantage 3: More time spent by politicians on sorting out other important issues
Theoretical local social advantage 4: More lurve
Sadly, I think you're right, especially about the politicians being hard to convince that this is something worth putting on the agenda - especially as the "WoT" gives them so much air time. That's that then. /me waves bye bye to another 30,000 people today
Quote by neilinleeds
to block a contact so you can appear to be offline, go online, show yourself to the entire Whole Wide World, select contact, block, suddenly appear offline without logging out! ummmmmmm not much of a give away there is it?
You've got me thinking... let's say you have two people, Adam and Betty. Adam is looking out for Betty, eagerly anticipating a chat. Betty wants to go online but has to do some stuff and doesn't want to be bothered - or whatever (aren't we all entitled to the level of privacy we want to have?). "Appear offline" seems a good solution. But Betty doesn't realise that Adam has "display alerts when contacts come online" enabled, and immediately spots Betty's arrival, only to see that she disappears immediately. Adam may misinterpret Betty's action as a personal snub.
I wonder how often something like the above happens?
More irony - a tool that purports to aid communication actually makes it more complicated!
Quote by neilinleeds
how about, instead of keeping me contacts on your server, i keep 'em on my PC, and when i log in, you just read 'em. bit like me offline address books? or is that like really really complicated? :doh:
That would be an option, although then you lose portability. The option to have the option might be a partial solution
/me wanders away wondering whether anyone but us gives a shit about such things :)
Quote by neilinleeds
mr gates and his coding chums are all too often a bit short on logic / practicality eh?
You can say that again (but if you do, 'ware rant risk
).Contemplating sending in further feedback to suggest a "wasted" status option (I currently use "Out to Lunch" to suggest that)
copy-and-paste from MSN messenger help feedback:
----------------
Spot the irony:
help system topic is about being able to appear offline. BUT it seems it's only possible to "appear to be offline" if you have first gone online in order to manually amend your status to "appear offline".
You have thereby notified all your contacts that you are online, only to go immediately offline, which only needs to happen a few times before your contacts wise up to what you're doing.
Which defeats the object, just a little, I'd say.
Bloody computers.
---------------
----------------
Spot the irony:
help system topic is about being able to appear offline. BUT it seems it's only possible to "appear to be offline" if you have first gone online in order to manually amend your status to "appear offline".
You have thereby notified all your contacts that you are online, only to go immediately offline, which only needs to happen a few times before your contacts wise up to what you're doing.
Which defeats the object, just a little, I'd say.
Bloody computers.
---------------
Quote by neilinleeds
beter
Maybe you need a speel-chucker.
Yes, I am taking the piss above just for fun :twisted: but I'm not, below.
Awesome post, well done! /me makes notes to read your reminder every night before going to bed. After several bottles of stella. Before making loads of edits to posts made that night. After getting thoroughly, utterly confuzzleplexed. Before going insane.
:lol: 
:doh: :undecided: Quote by Vix
Any one of the people here who have felt mine are welcome to say what they thought of how they felt. (If you don't mind naming and shaming yourselves, I sure as hell don't).
I thought they were a bit ropy, myself.
Just kidding!
Cripes... Am glad you mentioned the 'just kidding' bit... Nothing against your opinion, just... don't remember ever meeting you.
We haven't IRL
I couldn't resist, sorry
Quote by JonJon
On your other point, "New World Order" is a pretty generic term.
Unfortunately it's not. It is used by some people (including Gorbachev) to refer to the growing unity between East and West on political and economic issues, but if you hear a conspiracy theorist talking of it you can be reasonably certain that the 'global financiers' and 'European elite' (more euphemisms) are about to come up. There is a very widespread, and very alarming, given the lessons of history, belief in a Zionist conspiracy
OK, I'll take your word for it, I admit that I wouldn't be able to tell a Zionist conspiracy from a pork pie, and I'm afraid that as a result whatever your point is is lost on me :(
Sod conspiracies.
I apologise for providing the source for the quote, that just led us up the garden path.
Some 3000 people died (albeit tragically) over three years ago.
Meanwhile more than TEN TIMES that number of people die of starvation EVERY SINGLE DAY.
Can you say "Proportional response"?.
How about "Humanitarian crisis?".
When are we going to wake up and do something about this? At the moment, the answer seems to be "Sorry, squire, never, we're too busy locking things down to make sure that some idiot can't drive a car into a school and maybe kill one or two of our own kids." Or any number of other relatively trivial threats.
Perhaps if we as nations went and actually DID something to cure the world's problems instead of leaving it up to under-resourced charitable organisations, we might get those who currently don't like us very much to sit up and notice that we are actually the nice people we like to think we are?
Sorry if this sounds angry, but I am
Quote by JonJon
I don't, however, think that we have any right to dictate the process of mourning to the American people, or to anybody else affected, by stating that it's 'time to move on.'
You are of course quite right here. Serious foot-in-mouth problem, I apologise unreservedly to anyone of whatever nationality who lost loved ones in that disaster. I wasn't referring to them, I was talking about everyone else caught up in the hysteria.
Did you see "The Power of Nightmares" documentaries on BBC recently, JonJon? Opened my eyes to some things - at least to the extent that it proved that others have considered similar issues to some things I worry about, proved I'm not completely insane (I reckon partially insane is the normal state, me ;)).
On your other point, "New World Order" is a pretty generic term. I'm not sure that anyone "has their conspiracies right", surely the important thing is whether or not they exist... ?
Quote by xxdevil69
Just want to say that the two devils in this thread do have very nice donkeys.
devil_in_part has asked me to pass on his thanks for the compliment... and said its about time someone noticed his er.... donkey...!!!!
:eek: :scared:
/me looks again... well, his is a very nice donkey. But knowing what I know now, I have to say that I think yours is far nicer ;) Assuming you are as female as you both look from those angles. Oh dear oh dear, someone lend me a spade, I've got myself in one of those hole thingies :sticky:
Just came across this:
"On Tuesday September 11, 2001, at least 35,615 of our brothers and sisters died from the worst possible death, starvation.
Somewhere around 85% of these starvation deaths occur in children 5 years of age or younger.
Why are we letting at least 30,273 of the most beautiful children die the worst possible death every day?
Every seconds another one of our fellow brothers and sisters dies of starvation.
Starvation doesn't just happen on Tuesday September 11, 2001, it happens everyday, 365 days per year, 24 hours per day, it never stops."
(Source: . Not sure about the "illumanti" references though tbh).
Best argument I've yet come across that sums up why I've always
felt that it's wrong to react to "9/11" in the way that many people -
especially many of our American friends - do. Fortunately it seems
that people who think the same about this as me are starting to come
out of the woodwork, which is good: for the last few years it's
clearly been politically incorrect to talk about the Twin Towers
disaster in terms other than holy reverence.
Yes, it was tragic. But it's time to move on. We need to stop allowing
those who govern us use "9/11" and phantom menaces to control us,
to remove our civil liberties.
"On Tuesday September 11, 2001, at least 35,615 of our brothers and sisters died from the worst possible death, starvation.
Somewhere around 85% of these starvation deaths occur in children 5 years of age or younger.
Why are we letting at least 30,273 of the most beautiful children die the worst possible death every day?
Every seconds another one of our fellow brothers and sisters dies of starvation.
Starvation doesn't just happen on Tuesday September 11, 2001, it happens everyday, 365 days per year, 24 hours per day, it never stops."
(Source: . Not sure about the "illumanti" references though tbh).
Best argument I've yet come across that sums up why I've always
felt that it's wrong to react to "9/11" in the way that many people -
especially many of our American friends - do. Fortunately it seems
that people who think the same about this as me are starting to come
out of the woodwork, which is good: for the last few years it's
clearly been politically incorrect to talk about the Twin Towers
disaster in terms other than holy reverence.
Yes, it was tragic. But it's time to move on. We need to stop allowing
those who govern us use "9/11" and phantom menaces to control us,
to remove our civil liberties.
Quote by Albert Einstein
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.
Quote by Hierocles
We ought always to deal justly, not only with those who are just to us, but likewise to those who endeavor to injure us; and this, for fear lest by rendering them evil for evil, we should fall into the same vice.
Quote by Helen Keller
Science may have found a cure for most evils; but it has found no remedy for the worst of them all -- the apathy of human beings.
Quote by Mary Wollstonecraft
Every political good carried to the extreme must be productive of evil.
Quote by Molly Ivins
I believe that ignorance is the root of all evil. And that no one knows the truth.
Quote by Henry Brooks Adam
It is always good men who do the most harm in the world.
Quote by Robert Heinlein
But goodness alone is never enough. A hard cold wisdom is required, too, for goodness to accomplish good. Goodness without wisdom invariably accomplishes evil.
Quote by Friedrich Nietzche
Battle not with monsters
lest ye become a monster
and if you gaze into the abyss
the abyss gazes into you.
Quote by flapjackboy
And yes, I'm thoroughly enjoying HL2 .
Very, very, very :cool: game. Object physics are terrific, although having things you pick up hang in the air is a little disconcerting lol. The water looks real! Amazing.
Might actually get to kill something when I can stop looking around
Quote by Ice Pie
These silly-o-clock-in-the-morning posters really need to get a life. ;)
Sad, sad people, I agree.
Hey, where can I get one of those "life" things? And do they come in six-packs?
Quote by Basil Fawlty
Voooooooooooooooooooom!
"What was that?"
"That was your life, mate."
"Oh - do I get another one?"
"No, sorry."
