Quote by Sassy-Seren
, like most illegal sexual activities, is just wrong on so many levels :shock:
well... if you think about it...how many "other" people would have brought up the subject in here.....
I rest my case......
Quote by Kaznkev
Take a small bag for condoms etc to a club,saw this on another thread and followed it last night,it was great advice!
Last night i died and went to heaven,going again next week
Quote by ninetimesanight
Couldn't disagree with anything said above. I do wonder if this site is much use at all in terms of meeting people as a single guy? I've found the number of responses to polite, genuine emails to be incredibly low. The vast majority do not reply after reading, even to say no thanks. Perhaps the numbers of time wasters are so great that people have given up. You might have more luck at good club, especially if you are picky.
Dave
Quote by Dirtygirly
:gagged:
Quote by Too Hot
Where do you get that fact from? Ignorant & backward? Not sure about that.
When a Muslim posse abuses returning UK forces on a British High Street and no one cares or listens then perfectly normal and respectable people who do themselves know right from wroong become motivated to look for an answer. The vast majority of BNP supporters are neither ignorant, nor backward - they are just angry at how white middle class england is becoming positively discriminated against.
The mainstream parties should and could do something about this but fear of a "racist" label prevents real and meaningful policy.
On a broader note about the thread generally I think it is good and healthy that his appearence got everyone talking about BNP and inevitably race. It needs to be spoken about and not hidden in the bottom drawer. This event made news in the USA as well as the UK !!
The United Kingdom has always been a multicultural society - god, how far do we go back? Are you only really British if your descendants were here after the Romans? Why not before the Romans? Wait a minute does that mean we are really half French? Or shall we limit the real Brits to those of Druid origin?
The BNP are RIGHT to demand an immigration review (about the only thing they are right about). Let's embrace that idea and talk about it - why not?
Quote by SlurpySarah
If I support the BNP - am I then a thug? How do you qualify that, or is the whole phrase just something you've copied from somewhere for dramatic effect? I've also highlighted a word above that you seem to have glossed over - did you miss that important part?
As for you being comprised of 4 ethnic origins - lucky you, you'll have the choice of 5 countries to live in.
Woo hoo for you!!! :happy:
Quote by Crewe_Bi_Man
Can anyone suggest a good brand of condom, I have always been wary of buying anything other than Durex but that are not really comfortable.
Thanks !
Quote by Max777
well said splendid---sad and true.
Fab thank you for the heads up on the disgusting foul hate filled filth in the daily scum. The old "public interest" excuse again i see.
Quote by travlinmanukok
when you go to the USA they have literally hundreds and most are pay channels with boxes ?????
as soon as the american bashing started, you know i'd be here... if we are going to bring american tv into the discussion then at least get a few things straight
so tav.....ahem...hello.... sky... virgin media... ntl... telewest... do they not all provide "pay tv" services...in fact, if you want to stretch it then all the over ARE pay tv services....
and our govt in its quest to be little america will probably follow up this garbage idea :shock:
Actually... this time it is the UK leading in the field of the digital revoulution... for example.. sky sports and sky movies
so what we watch now will possibly get worse :shock:
that may be so... but i have loads move choice... and not all of it is worse.. it is a lot more diverse and you'll find something for everyone..
but the licence will still have to go up :shock:
but thats a different arguement to the one you were orginally making.... but i'll bite... in what way is the BBC not fulfilling its public service remit.... remember the license fee doesn't just go on TV, it goes to radio as well
possibly to pay for new bentlys for the news readers and dale winton of course :shock:
swiftly getting out my old bush post war radio ... to listen to the archers :P :P
the archers... would that not be on BBC radio 4... which your license fee pays for... so you have found it covers something you like... hmmmmm
trav..
Quote by Resonance
Wellll...
Since the Forum is now happily ready to accept slagging off us fat, ugly, disabled folk as all in all jolly good fun, harmless and entertaining I don't see what's wrong with this thread either.
After all, it is what makes the Forum go round isn't it? For the good of the site and all that...
It's just a post, the same as all the others. Or are you hinting some people shouldn't be allowed their opinion?
Gosh, must stop. Being far too provocative. ;-)
For what it's worth, I don't know if Brucie is a troll or not (I said his name! Oh lordy, strike me down!). I just despise arrogant, opinionated rudeness and won't overlook it simply because I want to fuck that person or find them attractive physically or intimidating intellectually.
But by the same token, I see no point in making an issue of it either as it just adds credence to his more hurtful statements and gives him the attention (nay, adulation of some) that he seems to crave.
Certainly as a ploy to stir things up and get himself noticed (and a following) it has worked very well, so you can't argue with results. Most people seem quite chuffed the forum seems to be buzzing again, so who therefore gives a toss if it offended a lot of people in the process? (Well I do, but I'm in the minority)
I just don't agree with how he achieved that initially. But hey ho, each to their own. Different strokes for different folks and all that. I'll try and rebuild my shattered life and move on. I can't really take issue with it. When I joined, I made a lot of noise, but chose to try and be funny and amusing. I've no doubt that annoyed just as many people as what Brucie did, but I would hope that it didn't offend.
Incidentally, different opinions have nothing to do with it. Opinions are fine, it is how you state them. Brucie could easily have said what he wanted to positively, perhaps stating he had a preference for young attractive ladies of a certain dress size. He didn't do that because it would not have got anywhere near the response. It may have been his different opinion, different take on attractiveness, but it was stated in a deliberately inflammatory, hurtful and controversial way designed to provoke and annoy. It worked well on that score, but to justify it as being "different opinions" is a bit lame. It's like saying Stalin had a different opinion to Lenin, or Hitler to Churchill, Gandhi to the Raj, Jeremy Kyle to most sane, reasonable people...
I could say my opinion is that all thin girls are anorexic drug addicts. Or that all black men are pimps all Bisexual people are just stupid and indecisive. I'd be shot down in flames for that and rightly so. But it is the same. An opinion. Just a different view of the world that some people don't agree with, which is apparently their problem for rushing to take offence, rather than mine.
In the end though, the Forum is a happy place, Brucie saved the world, some people love him and want his babies. Others hate him. Conflict breeds posts. Job done and it seems most folk are happy with it. The majority holds sway. Life goes on.
I just feel sorry for those folk who have basically been told "Yeah, you took offence or disagreed with what was stated, but please shut up and stop biting back at him. He's gorgeous don't you know!" For them to be cast as the pantomime villains of the piece, or slated as being "a forum bore" is, in my opinion, wrong and unfair. People have a right to express their opinion, even if they are supposedly fat and ugly.
It's that general perception, far moreso than Brucie's posts, that has bothered me a little.
But that's perhaps my problem and I've dealt with it and did so without feeling the need to lash out at a person or group of people to state it. That may seem paradoxical given that I've stated this here, but I'd hope that this comes across as intended, a gentle rational explanation of my feelings on the whole topic as raised by Mrs B and how events of the last few days have unfolded, rather than an attention seeking blast aimed at one person or a cross section of the forum.