Quote by Devon1
I read that as Victorian whore house
:lol:
Mind like a gutter, it's one of your best qualities Dev!
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Serendipity
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 107
Bisexual Male, 107
0 miles · Hertfordshire
Forum
Quote by Lost
"I'm going to take you outside and lick your sloppy wet minge and make you wriggle you horny fucking bitch"
Some might say thats fine I guess but for others maybe a little too fast and furious.
Urgh. That would never be fine for me, I hate the B word anyway but "sloppy wet minge"? sounds like something you'd get in a victorian workhouse :shock:
:shock:
It's certainly not how I would want some aspects of my sexual pleasures represented (esp the ones about dogging and "rough and tumble") but I guess it shouldn't be viewed as a representation of swingers and their thoughts, it's a generic sex guide being used for marketing purposes.
A bit disappointing though (the content rather than the people), as the basic idea isn't a bad one.
Dodgy set styling btw
It's certainly not how I would want some aspects of my sexual pleasures represented (esp the ones about dogging and "rough and tumble") but I guess it shouldn't be viewed as a representation of swingers and their thoughts, it's a generic sex guide being used for marketing purposes.
A bit disappointing though (the content rather than the people), as the basic idea isn't a bad one.
Dodgy set styling btw
I would never say that swinging is a lifestyle choice, I don't know what it is about that phrase but the whole idea of a "lifestyle choice" makes me want to scream
It's just part of my sex life, which I hope will be active for a few more decades yet! I like variety in sex so I'd imagine that swinging will remain part of that, not necessarily a constant but as and when I want it along with all the others things I enjoy
It's just part of my sex life, which I hope will be active for a few more decades yet! I like variety in sex so I'd imagine that swinging will remain part of that, not necessarily a constant but as and when I want it along with all the others things I enjoy
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
Anyway, in a very round about waffling way, what Im trying to get round to asking is, if you saw something on a profile or advert, which said attractive people only, would it put you off getting in touch, or do you consider yourself attractive?
It would very much depend on what else they'd written. If the profile went on to explain what the person considered "attractive" to be, then I'd be able to work out if I would be their type. If they'd not said anything other than "attractive people only" I'd probably not bother with them as it's a pretty lazy approach and would make me wonder if they'd be just as lazy about the sex too - so I wouldn't really get as far as worrying about whether I'd be attractive enough for them!
(Generally, I consider myself reasonably attractive. just not to everyone
) Overall though, I prefer to see profiles where people state what they do want rather than the types who only narrow down their criteria with negatives e.g. "no mingers", "no fat people", "no blokes with small cocks". Those types of profiles are way more off putting than people who say what they do want.
Quote by Cubes
Why do you think that is? Where's the sexual equality in it?
There isn't any, but women are owed at least a couple of hundred years worth of payback on the equality front. You lot wouldn't let us vote for so long that subsequent generations have evolved with all of that desire for emancipation pushed into other areas
It'll even out in about a hundred years time, although the postwoman will have been replaced by humourless robots with tasers, so you'll still lose out. Sorry :lol:
:lol: :lol: My vote is Ride of the Valkyries over a tannoy accompanied by a roof mounted floodlight covered with the cutout of a dogger with a stiffy (think bat signal).
Run Novaboy, Run! :twisted:
Mind you, I can recall using a CB and going on fox hunts with like minded teenage friends back in the day, hanging out in a variety of car parks with no awareness of any other..ahem....vehicular activities :lol:
If you like different sensations on your skin, get a butchers glove!
I visited a dungeon with some friends a while and came across what looked like a very fine chain mail glove. We all tried it out and it felt great against the skin but at the time I had no idea what it was. I only found out when watching "Great British Menu" a couple of weeks ago
- a metal mesh butchers glove!
I visited a dungeon with some friends a while and came across what looked like a very fine chain mail glove. We all tried it out and it felt great against the skin but at the time I had no idea what it was. I only found out when watching "Great British Menu" a couple of weeks ago
- a metal mesh butchers glove! Quote by Sassy-Seren
:giggle:
I love the idea of being watched but covertly rather than same room :twisted:
Me too, the idea of being "spied on" is a big turn on, or just knowing I'm being watched but I can't see them does it too.
As for being a voyeur, I can quite blatantly watch people but again the less obvious it is, the more fun it can be which is what I like about dogging I think.
Then there's aural voyeurism/exhibitionism - I enjoy the idea of hearing/being heard but not being able to see.
I think this might be why clubs don't interest me too much from either perspective, it's all a bit too on show and purposeful, it feels like it'd lack the "naughtiness" of catching someone and watching. I think I need the naughtiness for it to really flick my switches :twisted:
Quote by dirtydoggers
On the Monday, I received an email from them, asking if I was out of my mind? The mail went on. “How dare you send us to a dogging site full of single men? If it was some sort of a joke, I hope you are pleased with yourself! We’ll not bother coming to Norfolk again any time soon either. If that’s what you call dogging, no wonder its dead! Tell those losers to bring their wives out next time, then we can all have some funâ€
I thought “fuck me, that went down rather well didn’t it?â€
You have a real talent for finding the nicest people Unc! :giggle:
Quote by Martin_M
These are the new forum categories that will be added in the next few days. The forum will then get a makeover when the site update goes through in the next few months. At that point popular threads will also be promoted on the new home page. Once we get more people using it we an then have a survey about software and features to see if people want an upgrade etc.
Introduce yourself
Soapbox
Steam room
Current affairs
Swinging
Holidays
Just for fun
I'm confused by the three I've highlighted. Soapbox suggests to me somewhere to post something you want to rant about or passionately discuss (non swinging). Steam room would seem to be for ranting/moaning/getting it off your chest and Current Affairs would seem to be the place for non swinging discussions/debates/news. Is Soapbox just an extra place to do both or is it meant to be something else?
Judging by the names, it feels like there would be quite a content overlap by having all three forums.
Maybe you could outline the purpose of each a bit Martin?
Quote by Tan--Kinky
Do you hate knowing who is meeting who and would rather not know? or do you not mind if it is OK with all involved?
I don't really care either way, I don't see what the big deal is in swingers meeting other swingers :dunno:
Quote by Tan--Kinky
If you find out someone is ever a little bit indiscreet does it put you off meeting them or does it take more than 1 single thing?
I find it offputting if it's in private e.g. a guy once PMd me about meeting up and said (paraphrasing) - "I'm reliable and ok to meet, I shared a room with X at the social last weekend". I wasn't at the social in question and hadn't asked for anyone to vouch for him but what put me off was that I was certain that this wasn't info he was given carte blanche to share as I know X to be very private about meets.
Quote by Tan--Kinky
Is there a right place & time for indiscretion? or should it be all be kept private?
Is it sometimes just OTT flirting?
Discretion (or not) is simply what's agreed between all of the people who were there - the people who weren't there don't get to make that decision for them.
Quote by Tan--Kinky
I was in chat last night and a little bit of naming & shaming was going on :shock:, It was not nice to witness when the named were not there to stick up for themselves. Yes friends talk even compare but I don't think there is any need in an open chatroom.
I wouldn't call that indiscretion, "naming and shaming" doesn't sound like anything more than a bitchfest to me.
My take on this is that what I get up to isn't a secret but that doesn't automatically make the details everyone's business either
Quote by Dirtygirly
I'm telling ya, it's not the single bi females that are rocking horse poop/hens teeth/the holy grail!
No... we're facilitators! They're in hiding!! :giggle:
Actually, I should add that there are a few (and I do mean a FEW) who know exactly what they're about and show up and are fantastic - they more than make up for the ones who don't!
So don't give up hope, just accept that you may have a few lets downs on the way to finding a good 'un!
I don't think I have any fetishes, just an awful lot of kinks that come and go depending on my mood. I suppose I could have an reverse foot fetish, as I like people touching/kissing/playing with/sexualising my feet <waits for the chorus of ewwwwws> :twisted:
I get a kink, fixate on that for a while, then move on to something else, then come back to it. I think I like variety too much to have a fetish
I get a kink, fixate on that for a while, then move on to something else, then come back to it. I think I like variety too much to have a fetish
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
I don't worry about the performance side of things but I do worry if the person will like me, find me attractive and actually want to play
Probably the same as Mrs Wiggy really on the attraction front. I've never worried about my performance, I've practiced lots so it must be perfect by now fgs!
Quote by mortal
Like I said if it's a natural progression then OK. But I'm not sure it's what was really intended when the word was popularised.
Well, to borrow your rationale for a mo if I might, you're happy to use the word gay to describe someone whose orientation is homosexual and that's definitely not what was really intended when the word was popularised! Times do change.
For me, dogging has always meant voyeurism/exhibitionism in some form. But then as I don't fit neatly into "males out walking the dog" perhaps I'm naturally less inclined to worry about clear labels anyway
If you enjoy watching or being watched by a specific type of person e.g. a straight couple, is it really important who else might be indulging in the same thrill across the car park? You could argue that one lone straight male dogger peering through the window of a car at a couple who are putting on a show for him is not dogging at all but having a threesome if you felt the urge.
Don't you think trying to categorise who is/isn't dogging kinda takes the fun out of it though?
Quote by mortal
Am I wrong? If so why? What do you lot think.....
I think...why does it matter?
Not all voyeurs are the same, not all exhibitionsts are the same. I would rather enjoy watching two men having fun in a car park - if they spotted me and then invited me closer to watch, it wouldn't suddenly make them bi if they happened to be two gay guys, just because of my (female) presence. Dogging isn't a sexual orientation, it's often a desire to watch or be watched, some people might want an "appropriate" audience to their own sexuality, others might not give a hoot.
I also doubt your comment that male to male activity will go on because a woman is present. If there mere presence of women made all men love cock, I know plenty of women who'd be sooooooooo happy
Perhaps the ads you've seen are men looking for men to have fun in the open air, in the hope of being watched. If so, the dogging section is a reasonable place to be
I've tagged my only public pic (poor quality boobie shot warranting no more than a 5, so it'll be waaaaaay back on gallery page severalhundredandsomething now I've tagged it). However, it still has the "help us by tagging this pic" line on it.
If my own entry overrides what anyone would select anyway (thus making 9 other tags pointless), would it not be sensible for pics that I and others have self rated to change to "picture tagged by accountholder". That way, no-one else who feels the need to help with this will waste their time trying to categorise and rate our pics.
If you want the membership to do the legwork, help them by thinking through how to avoid inefficiencies before you launch it
If my own entry overrides what anyone would select anyway (thus making 9 other tags pointless), would it not be sensible for pics that I and others have self rated to change to "picture tagged by accountholder". That way, no-one else who feels the need to help with this will waste their time trying to categorise and rate our pics.
If you want the membership to do the legwork, help them by thinking through how to avoid inefficiencies before you launch it
Quote by BIoke
Oh and Dippy, DG and others... you're lovely really, but maybe rather than spoiling Dogging you should be at home baking, cooking and cleaning and doing all things lay-dee like?!x
Oi, I always wear heels when I'm in car parks, I'm very ladylike
<eyes oven with contempt>
<wonders if the item being eyed might be a dishwasher>
Quote by danne-gary
theres 2 of us here, washing machine on everyday at least once, dishwasher roughly 4/5 times a week (they use less water than washing up by hand anyway)
OMG! How can two people generate enough dirty clothes to need to use a washing machine at least once every day? That's astonishing!
